The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Apr;112:108658. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108658. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
To compare the bifomechanical advantages and disadvantages of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.
4 internal fixations were developed to treat Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture finite element models: a: the "F" shaped cannulated screw model, b: the traditional cannulated screw model, c: the "F" shaped cannulated screw coupled with medial plate model, d: the traditional cannulated screw coupled with medial plate. Under the same conditions, the 4 internal fixations and femur of von Mises stress and displacement distribution were studied.
The most significant displacement of all models occurred at the femoral head. The maximum displacement of the femoral heads included: a: 1.53 mm, b: 1.73 mm, c: 1.18 mm and d: 1.34 mm. The von Mises peak stresses of the femoral calcar area in different models were: a: 115.2 MPa, b: 143.5 MPa, c: 107.8 MPa and d: 120.5 MPa. The peak stresses of the four internal fixation models included: a: 318.0 MPa, b: 360.9 MPa, c: 468.8 MPa and d: 771.5 MPa.
The "F" shaped cannulated screw technique is capable of eliminating the torsional stress and shear stress while maintaining the axial compressive stress at the fracture end. Besides, the medial support plate can effectively resist the shearing force of the Pauwels III femoral neck fracture and create an excellent mechanical environment for fracture healing. Thus, for the Pauwels III femoral neck fracture, the use of "F" shaped cannulated screws combined with medial plate internal fixation are recommended.
比较不同内固定方法治疗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的双力学优缺点。
为治疗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折有限元模型,设计了 4 种内固定方法:a:“F”形空心钉模型,b:传统空心钉模型,c:“F”形空心钉联合内侧板模型,d:传统空心钉联合内侧板。在相同条件下,研究了 4 种内固定和股骨的 von Mises 应力和位移分布。
所有模型中最大的位移均发生在股骨头。股骨头的最大位移包括:a:1.53mm,b:1.73mm,c:1.18mm,d:1.34mm。不同模型股骨距区的 von Mises 峰值应力为:a:115.2MPa,b:143.5MPa,c:107.8MPa,d:120.5MPa。四种内固定模型的峰值应力包括:a:318.0MPa,b:360.9MPa,c:468.8MPa,d:771.5MPa。
“F”形空心钉技术能够消除扭转应力和剪力,同时保持骨折端的轴向压缩应力。此外,内侧支撑板可以有效抵抗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的剪力,并为骨折愈合创造良好的力学环境。因此,对于 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折,推荐使用“F”形空心钉联合内侧板内固定。