• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals.一分耕耘,一分收获?为对(大多数)实验动物进行基因改造以降低其能力辩护。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 9;9(4):154. doi: 10.3390/ani9040154.
2
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
3
The 3Rs and animal welfare - conflict or the way forward?3R原则与动物福利——冲突还是前进的道路?
ALTEX. 2003;20(Suppl 1):63-76.
4
Response to Erich Loewy: commentary.对埃里希·洛伊的回应:评论
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):90-1.
5
An ethics of suffering: does it solve the problems we want to solve?: commentary.一种关于苦难的伦理学:它能解决我们想要解决的问题吗?:评论
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):107.
6
The upper limits of pain and suffering in animal research.动物研究中疼痛与痛苦的上限
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Oct;24(4):431-47. doi: 10.1017/S0963180115000092.
7
Implementation and enforcement of the 3Rs principle in the field of transgenic animals used for scientific purposes. Report and recommendations of the BfR expert workshop, May 18-20, 2009, Berlin, Germany.在用于科学目的的转基因动物领域实施和执行 3R 原则。德国联邦风险评估研究所专家研讨会的报告和建议,2009 年 5 月 18 日至 20 日,德国柏林。
ALTEX. 2010;27(2):117-34.
8
Alternatives to animal experimentation in basic research.基础研究中动物实验的替代方法。
ALTEX. 2004;21 Suppl 1:3-31.
9
Genetic disenhancement and xenotransplantation: diminishing pigs' capacity to experience suffering through genetic engineering.
J Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 22;50(11):729-733. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109594.
10
[Animal experimentation, animal welfare and scientific research].[动物实验、动物福利与科学研究]
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2013 Oct;30(4):16-22, 74.

本文引用的文献

1
Concerns regarding 'off-target' activity of genome editing endonucleases.对基因组编辑内切酶“脱靶”活性的关注。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Oct;131:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.027. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
2
Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU.必要但不充分。2010/63/EU指令背景下动物研究项目评估中的效益概念。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Feb 28;8(3):34. doi: 10.3390/ani8030034.
3
cAMP: From Long-Range Second Messenger to Nanodomain Signalling.cAMP:从长距离第二信使到纳米域信号转导。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Feb;39(2):209-222. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
The Road to Hell Is Paved with Good Intentions: Why Harm-Benefit Analysis and Its Emphasis on Practical Benefit Jeopardizes the Credibility of Research.通往地狱之路铺满善意:为何利弊分析及其对实际益处的强调危及研究的可信度。
Animals (Basel). 2017 Sep 11;7(9):70. doi: 10.3390/ani7090070.
5
EU statistics on animal experiments for 2014.2014年欧盟动物实验统计数据。
ALTEX. 2016;33(4):465-468. doi: 10.14573/altex.1609291.
6
Turning apples into oranges? The harm-benefit analysis and how to take ethical considerations into account.把苹果变成橙子?利弊分析以及如何考虑伦理因素。
Altern Lab Anim. 2015 May;43(2):P22-4. doi: 10.1177/026119291504300211.
7
The multifactorial role of the 3Rs in shifting the harm-benefit analysis in animal models of disease.3Rs在改变疾病动物模型中危害-益处分析方面的多因素作用。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2015 Jul 15;759:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.基因组编辑。CRISPR-Cas9 技术引领的基因组工程新前沿。
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096.
9
Evaluating the ethical acceptability of animal research.评估动物研究的伦理可接受性。
Lab Anim (NY). 2014 Nov;43(11):411-4. doi: 10.1038/laban.572.
10
Pain in laboratory animals: the ethical and regulatory imperatives.实验动物的疼痛:伦理与监管要求
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e21578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021578. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

一分耕耘,一分收获?为对(大多数)实验动物进行基因改造以降低其能力辩护。

No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals.

作者信息

Devolder Katrien, Eggel Matthias

机构信息

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK.

Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 9;9(4):154. doi: 10.3390/ani9040154.

DOI:10.3390/ani9040154
PMID:30970545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6523187/
Abstract

Every year, around 12 million animals are used for the purpose of scientific research in the European Union alone. The procedures performed on them often cause significant pain and suffering. Despite regulations aimed at reducing this suffering, we can expect millions of research animals to continue to suffer in the near to mid-term future. Given this reality, we propose the use of gene editing to create research animals with a reduced capacity for suffering, in particular, from pain. We argue that our proposal would be in line with moral principles embedded in European regulations regarding animal research, and that it would facilitate compliance with these regulations. We also respond to the strongest argument against our proposal-the 'no pain no gain' argument.

摘要

仅在欧盟,每年就有约1200万只动物被用于科学研究目的。对它们实施的实验程序常常会导致巨大的痛苦。尽管有旨在减少这种痛苦的规定,但在近期至中期,我们仍可预期数百万只实验动物会继续遭受痛苦。鉴于这一现实,我们提议利用基因编辑来培育痛苦承受能力降低、尤其是对疼痛的承受能力降低的实验动物。我们认为,我们的提议将符合欧洲动物研究法规中所蕴含的道德原则,并且将有助于遵守这些法规。我们还回应了针对我们提议的最有力论据——“没有痛苦就没有收获”这一论点。