• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者接受复杂病变血运重建后不良结局的每日风险:RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究的亚组分析(真实现实中左主干或分叉病变患者使用 veRy 薄支架)。

Daily risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing complex lesions revascularization: A subgroup analysis from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Departement of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.

University Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;290:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.038
PMID:
30971372
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex lesions, including unprotected left main (ULM) and bifurcations, is gaining a relevant role in treating coronary artery disease with good outcomes, also thanks to new generation stents. The daily risk of adverse cardiovascular events and their temporal distribution after these procedures is not known.

METHODS

All consecutive patients presenting with a critical lesion of ULM or bifurcation treated with very thin struts stents, enrolled in the RAIN-Cardiogroup VII study, were analyzed. The daily risk of major acute cardiovascular events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis (ST) and their temporal distribution in the first year of follow-up was the primary endpoint. Differences among subgroups (ULM, patient presentation, kind of stent polymer) were the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

2745 patients were included, mean age 68 ± 11 years, 33.3% diabetics, 54.5% had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); 88.5% of treated lesions were bifurcations, 27.2% ULM. Average daily risk was 0.022% for MACE, 0.005% for TLR and 0.004% for ST, in the first year. Bimodal distribution of adverse events, especially TLR, with an early peak in the first 50 days and a late one after 150 days, was observed. Patients with ULM presented a significantly higher daily risk of events, and ACS patients presented higher MACE risk. No difference emerged according to the type of stent polymer.

CONCLUSIONS

The daily risk of adverse events in the first year after complex PCI in our study is acceptably low. PCI on ULM carries a higher risk of complications.

摘要

简介

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗复杂病变,包括无保护左主干(ULM)和分叉病变,由于新一代支架的应用,在治疗冠状动脉疾病方面发挥了重要作用,且具有良好的疗效。然而,目前尚不清楚这些操作后不良心血管事件的每日风险及其时间分布。

方法

所有连续因 ULM 或分叉病变接受极薄支架治疗的临界病变患者,均纳入 RAIN-Cardiogroup VII 研究。主要终点是分析患者在随访的第 1 年内发生主要急性心血管不良事件(MACE)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和支架血栓形成(ST)的每日风险及其时间分布。次要终点是亚组(ULM、患者表现、支架聚合物类型)之间的差异。

结果

共纳入 2745 例患者,平均年龄为 68±11 岁,33.3%的患者为糖尿病患者,54.5%为急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者;88.5%的治疗病变为分叉病变,27.2%为 ULM。在第 1 年内,MACE、TLR 和 ST 的平均每日风险分别为 0.022%、0.005%和 0.004%。观察到不良事件,特别是 TLR,呈双峰分布,早期峰在第 50 天,晚期峰在第 150 天。ULM 患者的事件发生风险显著更高,ACS 患者的 MACE 风险更高。支架聚合物的类型无差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,复杂 PCI 后第 1 年的不良事件每日风险可接受较低。ULM 的 PCI 并发症风险更高。

相似文献

1
Daily risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing complex lesions revascularization: A subgroup analysis from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life).患者接受复杂病变血运重建后不良结局的每日风险:RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究的亚组分析(真实现实中左主干或分叉病变患者使用 veRy 薄支架)。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;290:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
2
Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).无保护左主干时生物可吸收 vs 持久聚合物药物洗脱支架比较(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 15;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01420-5.
3
A Sex-Based Analysis From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study (VeRy Thin Stents for Patients With Left MAIn or BifurcatioN in Real Life) on Left Main Stenting.RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究(真实现场中左主干或分叉病变患者使用非常薄支架)的性别分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Sep;32(9):342-346. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00077. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main and bifurcation in octogenarians: Subanalysis from RAIN (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life).高龄患者非保护左主干和分叉病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:RAIN 研究(真实世界中左主干或分叉病变患者应用极细支架的亚组分析)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):755-763. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29048. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Impact of Final Kissing Balloon and of Imaging on Patients Treated on Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery With Thin-Strut Stents (From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).无保护左主干病变应用薄支架患者最终 Kissing Balloon 和影像学对患者的影响(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;123(10):1610-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
6
Impact of the metal-to-artery ratio on clinical outcomes in left main and nonleft main bifurcation: insights the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life).金属对动脉比在左主干和非左主干分叉病变患者临床结局中的影响:RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究的见解(真实生活中左主干或分叉病变患者使用 veRy 薄支架)。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Sep;21(9):669-674. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001010.
7
Provisional versus elective two-stent strategy for unprotected true left main bifurcation lesions: Insights from a FAILS-2 sub-study.非保护真左主干分叉病变中即刻 vs. 择期双支架策略:来自 FAILS-2 亚组研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;250:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.207. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
8
Self-expandable sirolimus-eluting stents compared to second-generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of the left main: A propensity score analysis from the SPARTA and the FAILS-2 registries.自膨式西罗莫司洗脱支架与第二代药物洗脱支架治疗左主干病变的比较:来自 SPARTA 和 FAILS-2 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):208-215. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27809. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
9
Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention extent, complexity and platelet reactivity on outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗程度、复杂性和血小板反应性对药物洗脱支架植入术后结局的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.103.
10
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的全因死亡率
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 17;12(6):990. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060990.
2
Randomised, non-inferiority, controlled procedural outcomes TrIal comParing reverse T And Protrusion versus double-kissing and crush stenting: protocol of the TIP TAP I randomised trial.随机、非劣效、对照程序结局试验比较反向 T 和突出与双吻合并压握式支架置入术:TIP TAP I 随机试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 16;10(6):e034264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034264.