• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无保护左主干病变应用薄支架患者最终 Kissing Balloon 和影像学对患者的影响(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。

Impact of Final Kissing Balloon and of Imaging on Patients Treated on Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery With Thin-Strut Stents (From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;123(10):1610-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.013
PMID:
30846212
Abstract

Few data are available about the impact on outcomes of procedural strategies for percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-struts stents on unprotected left main (ULM): 792 patients with an ULM stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-strut stents were enrolled in the present multicenter registry. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was the primary end point. MACE (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, TLR, and stent thrombosis) and its single components, along with target vessel revascularization were the secondary end points. Subgroup analyses were performed according to complex versus noncomplex bifurcation lesions. After 16 months, 5.5% of patients experienced a TLR. At multivariate analysis, provisional stenting (odds ratio [OR] 0.46: 0.85 to 0.23, p = 0.006), use of imaging (OR 0.45: 0.23 to 0.98, p = 0.003) and final kissing balloon (FKB) (OR 0.41: 0.83 to 0.21, p = 0.001) reduced risk of TLR. FKB reduced risk of overall TLR only for 2 stents-strategy (6.2% vs 32.4%, p <0.05), but not for provisional strategy (3.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.67). Intracoronary imaging reduced risk of overall TLR both for provisional (2.2% vs 5.4%) and for 2-stents strategy (7.3% vs 14.1% p <0.05 for both, all confidence interval 95%). In conclusion, TLR for ULM patients treated with thin-strut stents is infrequent. Provisional stenting was noninferior compared with 2-stents apart from complex lesions. Benefit from intracoronary imaging is consistent for different strategies, whereas that from FKB persists only for 2-stents.

摘要

目前,关于使用薄壁支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对无保护左主干(ULM)病变患者的结局影响的数据较少:本多中心注册研究共纳入 792 例接受薄壁支架 PCI 治疗的 ULM 狭窄患者。主要终点为靶病变血运重建(TLR)。主要终点为主要不良心脏事件(MACE,全因死亡、心肌梗死、TLR 和支架血栓形成的复合终点)及其各组成部分,以及靶血管血运重建。根据复杂分叉病变和非复杂分叉病变进行亚组分析。16 个月后,5.5%的患者发生 TLR。多变量分析显示,预扩张支架(比值比 [OR] 0.46:0.85 至 0.23,p=0.006)、使用影像学(OR 0.45:0.23 至 0.98,p=0.003)和最终的对吻球囊扩张(FKB)(OR 0.41:0.83 至 0.21,p=0.001)降低 TLR 风险。FKB 仅降低了 2 个支架策略的总体 TLR 风险(6.2%比 32.4%,p<0.05),而不是预扩张支架策略(3.8%比 3.7%,p=0.67)。冠状动脉内影像学检查降低了两种支架策略(分别为 2.2%比 5.4%和 7.3%比 14.1%,p<0.05,所有置信区间 95%)和预扩张支架策略(2.2%比 5.4%)的总体 TLR 风险。总之,接受薄壁支架治疗的 ULM 患者的 TLR 发生率较低。与 2 个支架策略相比,预扩张支架除复杂病变外并不劣于 2 个支架策略。冠状动脉内影像学检查的获益对不同策略是一致的,而 FKB 的获益仅持续于 2 个支架策略。

相似文献

1
Impact of Final Kissing Balloon and of Imaging on Patients Treated on Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery With Thin-Strut Stents (From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).无保护左主干病变应用薄支架患者最终 Kissing Balloon 和影像学对患者的影响(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;123(10):1610-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
2
Performance of Thin-Strut Stents in Non-Left Main Bifurcation Coronary Lesions: A RAIN Subanalysis.细杆支架在非左主干分叉病变中的应用:RAIN 亚组分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Nov;33(11):E890-E899. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00728.
3
Impact of Kissing Balloon in Patients Treated With Ultrathin Stents for Left Main Lesions and Bifurcations: An Analysis From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study.左主干病变和分叉病变患者应用超薄支架治疗中 Kissing Balloon 的影响:来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究的分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar;13(3):e008325. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008325. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Angiographic and clinical outcomes after implantation of drug eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with crush or kissing stent technique.药物洗脱支架在分叉病变中应用挤压或对吻支架技术后的血管造影和临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):145-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12022.x. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
Final kissing ballooning and long-term clinical outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with 1-stent technique: results from the COBIS registry.单支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的最终吻球扩张和长期临床结果:COBIS 注册研究结果。
Heart. 2012 Feb;98(3):225-31. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300322. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
6
Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).无保护左主干时生物可吸收 vs 持久聚合物药物洗脱支架比较(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 15;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01420-5.
7
A Sex-Based Analysis From the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study (VeRy Thin Stents for Patients With Left MAIn or BifurcatioN in Real Life) on Left Main Stenting.RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究(真实现场中左主干或分叉病变患者使用非常薄支架)的性别分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Sep;32(9):342-346. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00077. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
8
Daily risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing complex lesions revascularization: A subgroup analysis from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life).患者接受复杂病变血运重建后不良结局的每日风险:RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究的亚组分析(真实现实中左主干或分叉病变患者使用 veRy 薄支架)。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;290:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
9
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Final Kissing Ballooning in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With the 1-Stent Technique: Results From the COBIS II Registry (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry).1- 支架技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的最终 kissing 球囊扩张的长期临床结果:来自 COBIS II 注册研究(韩国冠状动脉分叉病变支架注册研究)的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1297-1307. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.015.
10
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.双对吻挤压术与预扩张支架术治疗左主干远端分叉病变的随机对照研究(DKCRUSH-V 研究)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with an upfront provisional stenting strategy.采用初始临时支架置入策略治疗的冠状动脉分叉病变患者的最终亲吻球囊扩张术
EuroIntervention. 2025 Mar 17;21(6):e318-e328. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00471.
2
Role of Intracoronary Imaging in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Disease (MINOCA): A Review.冠状动脉内成像在非阻塞性冠心病心肌梗死(MINOCA)中的作用:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 8;12(6):2129. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062129.
3
Ultrathin Struts Drug-Eluting Stents: A State-of-the-Art Review.
超薄支架药物洗脱支架:最新综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 25;12(9):1378. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091378.
4
Prediction of All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的全因死亡率
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 17;12(6):990. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060990.
5
Occurence of left main occlusion on Tuesday: Chronobiology of acute myocardial infarction due to left main disease.周二左主干闭塞的发生情况:左主干病变所致急性心肌梗死的时间生物学
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 17;32(1):12-16. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1003. eCollection 2020.
6
Percutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trials.经皮与手术血运重建治疗无保护左主干狭窄患者的对比:5 年随访随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Sep 16;7(5):476-485. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa041.
7
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Latest Evidence.冠状动脉分叉病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:最新证据
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Feb 8;22(2):6. doi: 10.1007/s11936-020-0806-4.
8
Sometimes neither water nor fire are more useful than friendship-a new risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing coronary angiography.有时,水和火都不如友谊有用——一种用于预测接受冠状动脉造影术患者的对比剂肾病(CIN)及长期不良结局的新风险评分。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(7):2675-2679. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.06.51.