Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;123(10):1610-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
Few data are available about the impact on outcomes of procedural strategies for percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-struts stents on unprotected left main (ULM): 792 patients with an ULM stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-strut stents were enrolled in the present multicenter registry. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was the primary end point. MACE (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, TLR, and stent thrombosis) and its single components, along with target vessel revascularization were the secondary end points. Subgroup analyses were performed according to complex versus noncomplex bifurcation lesions. After 16 months, 5.5% of patients experienced a TLR. At multivariate analysis, provisional stenting (odds ratio [OR] 0.46: 0.85 to 0.23, p = 0.006), use of imaging (OR 0.45: 0.23 to 0.98, p = 0.003) and final kissing balloon (FKB) (OR 0.41: 0.83 to 0.21, p = 0.001) reduced risk of TLR. FKB reduced risk of overall TLR only for 2 stents-strategy (6.2% vs 32.4%, p <0.05), but not for provisional strategy (3.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.67). Intracoronary imaging reduced risk of overall TLR both for provisional (2.2% vs 5.4%) and for 2-stents strategy (7.3% vs 14.1% p <0.05 for both, all confidence interval 95%). In conclusion, TLR for ULM patients treated with thin-strut stents is infrequent. Provisional stenting was noninferior compared with 2-stents apart from complex lesions. Benefit from intracoronary imaging is consistent for different strategies, whereas that from FKB persists only for 2-stents.
目前,关于使用薄壁支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对无保护左主干(ULM)病变患者的结局影响的数据较少:本多中心注册研究共纳入 792 例接受薄壁支架 PCI 治疗的 ULM 狭窄患者。主要终点为靶病变血运重建(TLR)。主要终点为主要不良心脏事件(MACE,全因死亡、心肌梗死、TLR 和支架血栓形成的复合终点)及其各组成部分,以及靶血管血运重建。根据复杂分叉病变和非复杂分叉病变进行亚组分析。16 个月后,5.5%的患者发生 TLR。多变量分析显示,预扩张支架(比值比 [OR] 0.46:0.85 至 0.23,p=0.006)、使用影像学(OR 0.45:0.23 至 0.98,p=0.003)和最终的对吻球囊扩张(FKB)(OR 0.41:0.83 至 0.21,p=0.001)降低 TLR 风险。FKB 仅降低了 2 个支架策略的总体 TLR 风险(6.2%比 32.4%,p<0.05),而不是预扩张支架策略(3.8%比 3.7%,p=0.67)。冠状动脉内影像学检查降低了两种支架策略(分别为 2.2%比 5.4%和 7.3%比 14.1%,p<0.05,所有置信区间 95%)和预扩张支架策略(2.2%比 5.4%)的总体 TLR 风险。总之,接受薄壁支架治疗的 ULM 患者的 TLR 发生率较低。与 2 个支架策略相比,预扩张支架除复杂病变外并不劣于 2 个支架策略。冠状动脉内影像学检查的获益对不同策略是一致的,而 FKB 的获益仅持续于 2 个支架策略。