Frosh Stephen
Department of Psychosocial Studies, Birkbeck, University of London, Room 502A, 30 Russell Square, London, WC1B 5DT, UK.
Am J Psychoanal. 2019 Jun;79(2):156-173. doi: 10.1057/s11231-019-09185-3.
The urgency of the problem of how to learn from the relatively recent past in order not to repeat its devastating effects, a problem that revolves around the ethics of memory and history, has combined with an awareness that later generations of victims and perpetrators-the "post" generations-may find themselves inhibited in relation to moving forwards because they are not truly "post" at all. It is as if they are haunted by the experiences of their predecessors, which is passed on in some way through stories and selective silences, as well as through the older generation's ways of handling themselves and the personal and cultural representations of their situation. This article presents a psychoanalytic reading of the postmemory literature, drawing on second generation Holocaust literature and in particular rendering the distinction between postmemory as a mode of traumatic identification and postmemorial work as a form of working through. Active memorial work that allows repetitions to be turned into processes of recovery is essential for the laying of ghosts to rest.
如何从相对较近的过去吸取教训以避免重蹈其毁灭性后果这一问题的紧迫性,这个围绕记忆与历史伦理的问题,与一种意识相结合,即后世的受害者和加害者——“后”代人——可能会发现自己在向前迈进时受到阻碍,因为他们根本就不是真正的“后”。仿佛他们被前辈的经历所萦绕,这些经历以某种方式通过故事、有选择的沉默,以及老一辈处理自身的方式和他们对自身处境的个人及文化呈现得以传承。本文对后记忆文学进行了精神分析解读,借鉴了第二代大屠杀文学,尤其阐述了作为创伤认同模式的后记忆与作为一种疏导形式的后纪念工作之间的区别。让重复转变为恢复过程的积极纪念工作对于平息幽灵至关重要。