Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Oct;139(10):2090-2097.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1152. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
Quality-of-life assessments are not standardized in atopic dermatitis (AD). We sought to determine the validity of the Short Form (SF)-12, a generic quality-of-life assessment, in AD and compare its measurement properties with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A cross-sectional, population-based study of 3,495 adults was performed, including 602 adults who met the modified United Kingdom Working Party Criteria for AD. The SF-12 mental component score and the SF-Six Dimension (SF-6D) had a strong correlation with each other and moderate inverse correlations with the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis-itch, the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis-sleep, and the Numerical Rating Scale of pain (Pearson correlations, P < 0.0001 for all). The SF-12 mental component score and the SF-6D showed good discriminant validity as judged by the analysis of variance and receiver operating curves. The SF-12 physical component score had weak correlations with AD severity assessments and poor discriminant validity. The DLQI had better convergent and discriminant validity than the SF-12. The SF-12 and the DLQI showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.89 and 0.94, respectively). Differential item functioning was found for items in the SF-12 and the DLQI. Floor effects were observed for the DLQI but not for the SF-12 mental component score, the SF-12 physical component score, and the SF-6D. Severity thresholds were selected. In conclusion, the SF-12 mental component score and the SF-6D showed good validity in AD but inferior construct validity compared with the DLQI.
特应性皮炎(AD)的生活质量评估尚未标准化。我们旨在确定通用生活质量评估简表(SF-12)在 AD 中的有效性,并比较其与皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)的测量特性。对 3495 名成年人进行了横断面、基于人群的研究,其中包括 602 名符合改良英国工作组 AD 标准的成年人。SF-12 心理成分评分与 SF-六维健康量表(SF-6D)具有很强的相关性,与患者导向湿疹量表、患者导向特应性皮炎评分、患者导向特应性皮炎瘙痒评分、患者导向特应性皮炎睡眠评分和疼痛数字评分量表(Pearson 相关性,P<0.0001)呈中度负相关。SF-12 心理成分评分和 SF-6D 显示出良好的判别有效性,方差分析和接收者操作曲线分析显示。SF-12 身体成分评分与 AD 严重程度评估的相关性较弱,判别有效性较差。DLQI 比 SF-12 具有更好的收敛和判别有效性。SF-12 和 DLQI 显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach alpha,分别为 0.89 和 0.94)。SF-12 和 DLQI 的项目存在差异功能。在 DLQI 中观察到地板效应,但在 SF-12 心理成分评分、SF-12 身体成分评分和 SF-6D 中没有观察到。选择了严重程度阈值。总之,SF-12 心理成分评分和 SF-6D 在 AD 中具有良好的有效性,但与 DLQI 相比,结构有效性较差。