Suppr超能文献

成人特应性皮炎的简化 12 项健康调查量表的验证和解读及其与皮肤病生活质量指数的比较。

Validation and Interpretation of Short Form 12 and Comparison with Dermatology Life Quality Index in Atopic Dermatitis in Adults.

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Oct;139(10):2090-2097.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1152. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

Abstract

Quality-of-life assessments are not standardized in atopic dermatitis (AD). We sought to determine the validity of the Short Form (SF)-12, a generic quality-of-life assessment, in AD and compare its measurement properties with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A cross-sectional, population-based study of 3,495 adults was performed, including 602 adults who met the modified United Kingdom Working Party Criteria for AD. The SF-12 mental component score and the SF-Six Dimension (SF-6D) had a strong correlation with each other and moderate inverse correlations with the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis-itch, the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis-sleep, and the Numerical Rating Scale of pain (Pearson correlations, P < 0.0001 for all). The SF-12 mental component score and the SF-6D showed good discriminant validity as judged by the analysis of variance and receiver operating curves. The SF-12 physical component score had weak correlations with AD severity assessments and poor discriminant validity. The DLQI had better convergent and discriminant validity than the SF-12. The SF-12 and the DLQI showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.89 and 0.94, respectively). Differential item functioning was found for items in the SF-12 and the DLQI. Floor effects were observed for the DLQI but not for the SF-12 mental component score, the SF-12 physical component score, and the SF-6D. Severity thresholds were selected. In conclusion, the SF-12 mental component score and the SF-6D showed good validity in AD but inferior construct validity compared with the DLQI.

摘要

特应性皮炎(AD)的生活质量评估尚未标准化。我们旨在确定通用生活质量评估简表(SF-12)在 AD 中的有效性,并比较其与皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)的测量特性。对 3495 名成年人进行了横断面、基于人群的研究,其中包括 602 名符合改良英国工作组 AD 标准的成年人。SF-12 心理成分评分与 SF-六维健康量表(SF-6D)具有很强的相关性,与患者导向湿疹量表、患者导向特应性皮炎评分、患者导向特应性皮炎瘙痒评分、患者导向特应性皮炎睡眠评分和疼痛数字评分量表(Pearson 相关性,P<0.0001)呈中度负相关。SF-12 心理成分评分和 SF-6D 显示出良好的判别有效性,方差分析和接收者操作曲线分析显示。SF-12 身体成分评分与 AD 严重程度评估的相关性较弱,判别有效性较差。DLQI 比 SF-12 具有更好的收敛和判别有效性。SF-12 和 DLQI 显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach alpha,分别为 0.89 和 0.94)。SF-12 和 DLQI 的项目存在差异功能。在 DLQI 中观察到地板效应,但在 SF-12 心理成分评分、SF-12 身体成分评分和 SF-6D 中没有观察到。选择了严重程度阈值。总之,SF-12 心理成分评分和 SF-6D 在 AD 中具有良好的有效性,但与 DLQI 相比,结构有效性较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验