Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Department of Public Health Sciences.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 May;128(4):352-363. doi: 10.1037/abn0000418. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
To advance what is known about how emotions affect memory in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we examined emotional false memory for negative, positive, and neutrally valenced photographs comprising scripts of everyday events in a verbal IQ-case matched sample of youth ages 8-14 with ASD ( = 38) and typical development (TYP, = 38). The groups exhibited many similarities. Their task performance during a recognition task including previously seen and unseen photographs was largely comparable. They evidenced high hit rates for previously viewed photographs, and low false alarm rates for lure photographs that were inconsistent with the scripts. Both ASD and TYP groups showed relatively higher false alarms for lure photographs depicting previously unseen causes of scenario outcomes (causal errors) compared to errors for script-consistent lure photographs that showed extra potentially related events (gap-filling errors). In both groups, task performance was associated with verbal working memory, but not attention deficit hyperactivity, anxiety, or depression symptoms. However, the ASD group made more causal and gap-filling errors on negative and positive, but not neutral, lures compared to TYP, indicating that viewing emotionally valenced stimuli made it harder to discriminate previously seen and unseen photographs. For the ASD group, task performance was associated with compulsive, ritualistic, and sameness behaviors and stereotypic and restricted interests. Findings suggest that the integration of cognition and emotion in ASD is altered and associated with the presence of repetitive behaviors. The impact of these results on the lives of individuals with ASD and implications for psychosocial interventions are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
为了深入了解情绪如何影响自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中的记忆,我们研究了负面、正面和中性情绪照片的情感错误记忆,这些照片包含了日常事件的脚本,参与者为年龄在 8 到 14 岁的 ASD (n=38)和典型发育(TYP,n=38)的青少年。这两个群体表现出许多相似之处。他们在识别任务中的表现,包括之前见过和未见过的照片,基本相似。他们对之前看过的照片有很高的正确再认率,对与脚本不一致的诱饵照片有很低的虚报率。ASD 和 TYP 组对描绘先前未见的场景结果原因的诱饵照片(因果错误)的虚报率相对较高,而对显示额外相关事件的与脚本一致的诱饵照片(填补空白错误)的虚报率相对较低。在这两个组中,任务表现与言语工作记忆有关,但与注意力缺陷多动障碍、焦虑或抑郁症状无关。然而,与 TYP 组相比,ASD 组在负面和正面情绪的诱饵上犯了更多的因果和填补空白错误,但在中性情绪的诱饵上则没有,这表明观看情绪效价刺激会更难区分之前见过和未见过的照片。对于 ASD 组来说,任务表现与强迫、刻板和一致性行为以及刻板和受限的兴趣有关。研究结果表明,ASD 中认知和情绪的整合发生了改变,并与重复行为的存在有关。讨论了这些结果对 ASD 个体生活的影响以及对心理社会干预的意义。(APA 保留所有权利,2019 年,PsycINFO 数据库记录)。