Mirandola Chiara, Toffalini Enrico, Ciriello Alfonso, Cornoldi Cesare
a Department of General Psychology , University of Padova , Padova , Italy.
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jan;31(1):33-46. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1075379. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
Whereas a link between working memory (WM) and memory distortions has been demonstrated, its influence on emotional false memories is unclear. In two experiments, a verbal WM task and a false memory paradigm for negative, positive or neutral events were employed. In Experiment 1, we investigated individual differences in verbal WM and found that the interaction between valence and WM predicted false recognition, with negative and positive material protecting high WM individuals against false remembering; the beneficial effect of negative material disappeared in low WM participants. In Experiment 2, we lowered the WM capacity of half of the participants with a double task request, which led to an overall increase in false memories; furthermore, consistent with Experiment 1, the increase in negative false memories was larger than that of neutral or positive ones. It is concluded that WM plays a critical role in determining false memory production, specifically influencing the processing of negative material.
虽然工作记忆(WM)与记忆扭曲之间的联系已得到证实,但其对情绪性错误记忆的影响尚不清楚。在两项实验中,采用了言语工作记忆任务以及针对消极、积极或中性事件的错误记忆范式。在实验1中,我们研究了言语工作记忆的个体差异,发现效价与工作记忆之间的交互作用可预测错误识别,消极和积极材料可保护高工作记忆个体不产生错误记忆;消极材料对低工作记忆参与者的有益作用消失。在实验2中,我们通过双重任务要求降低了一半参与者的工作记忆容量,这导致错误记忆总体增加;此外,与实验1一致,消极错误记忆的增加幅度大于中性或积极错误记忆。研究得出结论,工作记忆在决定错误记忆产生方面起关键作用,尤其影响对消极材料的加工。