• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种广受欢迎的在线症状检查器在眼科诊断中的准确性。

Accuracy of a Popular Online Symptom Checker for Ophthalmic Diagnoses.

机构信息

Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 1;137(6):690-692. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0571.

DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0571
PMID:30973602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6567837/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Because more patients are presenting with self-guided research of symptoms, it is important to assess the capabilities and limitations of these available health information tools.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of the most popular online symptom checker for ophthalmic diagnoses.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a cross-sectional study, 42 validated clinical vignettes of ophthalmic symptoms were generated and distilled to their core presenting symptoms. Cases were entered into WebMD symptom checker by both medically trained and nonmedically trained personnel blinded to the diagnosis. Output from the symptom checker, including the number of symptoms, ranking and list of diagnoses, and triage urgency were recorded. The study was conducted on October 13, 2017. Analysis was performed between October 15, 2017, and April 30, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Accuracy of the top 3 diagnoses generated by the online symptom checker.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) number of symptoms entered was 3.6 (1.6) (range, 1-8). The median (SD) number of diagnoses generated by the symptom checker was 26.8 (21.8) (range, 1-99). The primary diagnosis by the symptom checker was correct in 11 of 42 (26%; 95% CI, 12%-40%) cases. The correct diagnosis was included in the online symptom checker's top 3 diagnoses in 16 of 42 (38%; 95% CI, 25%-56%) cases. The correct diagnosis was not included in the symptom checker's list in 18 of 42 (43%; 95% CI, 32%-63%) cases. Triage urgency based on the top diagnosis was appropriate in 7 of 18 (39%; 95% CI, 14%-64%) emergent cases and 21 of 24 (88%; 95% CI, 73%-100%) nonemergent cases. Interuser variability for the correct diagnosis being in the top 3 listed was at least moderate (Cohen κ = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The most popular online symptom checker may arrive at the correct clinical diagnosis for ophthalmic conditions, but a substantial proportion of diagnoses may not be captured. These findings suggest that further research to reflect the real-life application of internet diagnostic resources is required.

摘要

重要性

由于越来越多的患者自行研究症状,因此评估这些可用健康信息工具的能力和局限性非常重要。

目的

确定最受欢迎的在线症状检查器在眼科诊断中的准确性。

设计、地点和参与者:在一项横断面研究中,生成了 42 个经过验证的眼科症状临床病例,并将其简化为其核心表现症状。由接受过医学培训和未接受过医学培训的人员将这些病例输入 WebMD 症状检查器,这些人员对诊断结果均不知情。记录症状检查器的输出结果,包括症状数量、排名和诊断列表以及分诊紧急程度。研究于 2017 年 10 月 13 日进行。分析于 2017 年 10 月 15 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日之间进行。

主要结果和措施

在线症状检查器生成的前 3 个诊断的准确性。

结果

输入的平均(SD)症状数为 3.6(1.6)(范围,1-8)。症状检查器生成的中位数(SD)诊断数为 26.8(21.8)(范围,1-99)。症状检查器的主要诊断在 42 例(26%;95%CI,12%-40%)中是正确的。在 42 例中,正确的诊断包含在在线症状检查器的前 3 个诊断中(38%;95%CI,25%-56%)。在 42 例中,正确的诊断未包含在症状检查器的列表中(43%;95%CI,32%-63%)。基于顶级诊断的分诊紧急程度在 18 例(39%;95%CI,14%-64%)紧急病例中是适当的,在 24 例(88%;95%CI,73%-100%)非紧急病例中也是适当的。正确诊断在列出的前 3 名中的一致性至少为中等(Cohen κ=0.74;95%CI,0.54-0.95)。

结论和相关性

最受欢迎的在线症状检查器可能会得出眼科疾病的正确临床诊断,但很大一部分诊断可能无法捕捉到。这些发现表明,需要进一步研究以反映互联网诊断资源的实际应用。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of a Popular Online Symptom Checker for Ophthalmic Diagnoses.一种广受欢迎的在线症状检查器在眼科诊断中的准确性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 1;137(6):690-692. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0571.
2
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study.用于自我诊断和分诊的症状检查器评估:审计研究
BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3480.
3
Evaluation of Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy and Usability of a Symptom Checker in an Emergency Department: Observational Study.在急诊科评估诊断和分诊准确性及症状检查器的可用性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 19;10(9):e38364. doi: 10.2196/38364.
4
Online symptom checker diagnostic and triage accuracy for HIV and hepatitis C.在线症状检查器对 HIV 和丙型肝炎的诊断和分诊准确性。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e104. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000268.
5
Longitudinal Changes in Diagnostic Accuracy of a Differential Diagnosis List Developed by an AI-Based Symptom Checker: Retrospective Observational Study.基于人工智能的症状检查器生成的鉴别诊断列表诊断准确性的纵向变化:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 17;8:e53985. doi: 10.2196/53985.
6
Artificial intelligence chatbot performance in triage of ophthalmic conditions.人工智能聊天机器人在眼科疾病分诊中的表现。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;59(4):e301-e308. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.07.016. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
7
Comparison of Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy of Ada Health and WebMD Symptom Checkers, ChatGPT, and Physicians for Patients in an Emergency Department: Clinical Data Analysis Study.Ada 健康和 WebMD 症状检查器、ChatGPT 和医生对急诊科患者的诊断和分诊准确性比较:临床数据分析研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Oct 3;11:e49995. doi: 10.2196/49995.
8
Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对人工智能辅助症状检查器有用性的看法:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 30;22(1):e14679. doi: 10.2196/14679.
9
How Accurate Are Patients at Diagnosing the Cause of Their Knee Pain With the Help of a Web-based Symptom Checker?患者借助基于网络的症状检查器诊断膝关节疼痛病因的准确率如何?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Feb 19;4(2):2325967116630286. doi: 10.1177/2325967116630286. eCollection 2016 Feb.
10
A Symptom-Checker for Adult Patients Visiting an Interdisciplinary Emergency Care Center and the Safety of Patient Self-Triage: Real-Life Prospective Evaluation.成人患者就诊于多学科急诊中心的症状自查工具和患者自我分诊的安全性:真实世界前瞻性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 27;26:e58157. doi: 10.2196/58157.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Safety, Efficiency, Cost, and Satisfaction Across a Musculoskeletal Pathway Using the Digital Assessment Routing Tool for Triage: Quality Improvement Study.使用数字评估分流工具改善肌肉骨骼疾病诊疗路径中的安全性、效率、成本和满意度:质量改进研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67269. doi: 10.2196/67269.
2
Enhancing diagnostic accuracy in symptom-based health checkers: a comprehensive machine learning approach with clinical vignettes and benchmarking.提高基于症状的健康检查中的诊断准确性:一种结合临床病例和基准测试的综合机器学习方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Oct 1;7:1397388. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1397388. eCollection 2024.
3
Triage Accuracy and the Safety of User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker in a Real-Life Setting: Instrument Validation Study.在真实环境中,使用电子症状检查器进行用户发起的症状评估的分诊准确性和安全性:仪器验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 26;11:e55099. doi: 10.2196/55099.
4
Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Symptom Checkers: Clinical Vignette Study.评估症状检查器的诊断性能:临床病例研究。
JMIR AI. 2024 Apr 29;3:e46875. doi: 10.2196/46875.
5
Controlling Inputter Variability in Vignette Studies Assessing Web-Based Symptom Checkers: Evaluation of Current Practice and Recommendations for Isolated Accuracy Metrics.评估基于网络的症状检查器的病例研究中控制输入者变异性:当前实践评估及孤立准确性指标建议
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 31;8:e49907. doi: 10.2196/49907.
6
Enhancing Ophthalmic Triage: identification of new clinical features to support healthcare professionals in triage.增强眼科分诊能力:识别新的临床特征,以支持医护人员进行分诊。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Sep;38(13):2536-2544. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03070-9. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study.评估数字症状检查工具在提示生殖健康状况方面的准确性:临床病例研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Dec 5;11:e46718. doi: 10.2196/46718.
8
User-Initiated Symptom Assessment With an Electronic Symptom Checker: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Validation Study.使用电子症状检查器进行用户发起的症状评估:一项混合方法验证研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 19;12:e41423. doi: 10.2196/41423.
9
Utilization of Online Resources by Patients in an Ophthalmic Emergency Department.眼科急诊科患者对在线资源的利用情况。
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021 Dec 11;13(2):e247-e255. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722310. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
Self-Triage Use, Subsequent Healthcare Utilization, and Diagnoses: A Retrospective Study of Process and Clinical Outcomes Following Self-Triage and Self-Scheduling for Ear or Hearing Symptoms.自我分诊的使用、后续医疗保健利用及诊断:一项关于耳或听力症状自我分诊和自我预约后过程及临床结果的回顾性研究
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 18;10:23333928231168121. doi: 10.1177/23333928231168121. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits.眼部相关急诊就诊的流行病学。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;134(3):312-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5778.
2
Internet self-diagnosis in hand surgery.手外科的网络自我诊断
Hand (N Y). 2015 Sep;10(3):565-9. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9707-x.
3
Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study.用于自我诊断和分诊的症状检查器评估:审计研究
BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3480.
4
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
5
Accuracy of a computer-based diagnostic program for ambulatory patients with knee pain.针对膝关节疼痛门诊患者的计算机辅助诊断程序的准确性
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2371-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541654. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
6
How good is Internet self-diagnosis of ENT symptoms using Boots WebMD symptom checker?使用博姿WebMD症状检查器对耳鼻喉科症状进行互联网自我诊断的效果如何?
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;36(5):517-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02375.x.
7
Internet use by ophthalmology patients.眼科患者使用互联网的情况。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;94(3):378-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.170324.
8
Referrals to ophthalmology: optometric and general practice comparison.眼科转诊:验光师与全科医生的比较
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Jan;29(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00614.x.
9
Patterns of ophthalmological complaints presenting to a dedicated ophthalmic Accident & Emergency department: inappropriate use and patients' perspective.就诊于眼科急症专科部门的眼科疾病主诉模式:不恰当的使用情况及患者观点。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Nov;25(11):740-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.057604.
10
Pattern of ophthalmological accidents and emergencies presenting to hospitals.医院眼科急症与突发事件的模式。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Oct;47(5):382-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.5.382.