North Frederick, Jensen Teresa B, Stroebel Robert J, Nelson Elissa M, Johnson Brenda J, Thompson Matthew C, Pecina Jennifer L, Crum Brian A
Department of Medicine, Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 18;10:23333928231168121. doi: 10.1177/23333928231168121. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Self-triage is becoming more widespread, but little is known about the people who are using online self-triage tools and their outcomes. For self-triage researchers, there are significant barriers to capturing subsequent healthcare outcomes. Our integrated healthcare system was able to capture subsequent healthcare utilization of individuals who used self-triage integrated with self-scheduling of provider visits.
We retrospectively examined healthcare utilization and diagnoses after patients had used self-triage and self-scheduling for ear or hearing symptoms. Outcomes and counts of office visits, telemedicine interactions, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were captured. Diagnosis codes associated with subsequent provider visits were dichotomously categorized as being associated with ear or hearing concerns or not. Nonvisit care encounters of patient-initiated messages, nurse triage calls, and clinical communications were also captured.
For 2168 self-triage uses, we were able to capture subsequent healthcare encounters within 7 days of the self-triage for 80.5% (1745/2168). In subsequent 1092 office visits with diagnoses, 83.1% (891/1092) of the uses were associated with relevant ear, nose and throat diagnoses. Only 0.24% (4/1662) of patients with captured outcomes were associated with a hospitalization within 7 days. Self-triage resulted in a self-scheduled office visit in 7.2% (126/1745). Office visits resulting from a self-scheduled visit had significantly fewer combined non-visit care encounters per office visit (fewer combined nurse triage calls, patient messages, and clinical communication messages) than office visits that were not self-scheduled (-0.51; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.29; < .0001).
In an appropriate healthcare setting, self-triage outcomes can be captured in a high percentage of uses to examine for safety, patient adherence to recommendations, and efficiency of self-triage. With the ear or hearing self-triage, most uses had subsequent visit diagnoses relevant to ear or hearing, so most patients appeared to be selecting the appropriate self-triage pathway for their symptoms.
自我分诊正变得越来越普遍,但对于使用在线自我分诊工具的人群及其结果却知之甚少。对于自我分诊研究人员而言,获取后续医疗保健结果存在重大障碍。我们的综合医疗系统能够获取使用自我分诊并自行安排就诊预约的个人的后续医疗保健利用情况。
我们回顾性研究了患者使用自我分诊和自行安排就诊预约来处理耳部或听力症状后的医疗保健利用情况和诊断结果。记录了门诊就诊、远程医疗互动、急诊科就诊和住院治疗的结果及次数。与后续就诊相关的诊断代码被二分法分类为与耳部或听力问题相关或无关。还记录了患者发起的信息、护士分诊电话和临床沟通等非就诊护理接触情况。
对于2168次自我分诊使用情况,我们能够在自我分诊后的7天内获取80.5%(1745/2168)的后续医疗保健接触情况。在随后的1092次有诊断结果的门诊就诊中,83.1%(891/1092)的使用情况与相关的耳鼻喉科诊断有关。在有记录结果的患者中,只有0.24%(4/1662)在7天内住院。自我分诊导致7.2%(126/1745)的患者自行安排了门诊就诊。自行安排就诊的门诊就诊每次就诊的非就诊护理接触综合次数(护士分诊电话、患者信息和临床沟通信息的综合次数)明显少于非自行安排的门诊就诊(-0.51;95%可信区间,-0.72至-0.29;P<0.0001)。
在适当的医疗环境中,可以在高比例的使用情况中获取自我分诊结果,以检查安全性、患者对建议的依从性以及自我分诊的效率。对于耳部或听力自我分诊,大多数使用情况随后的就诊诊断与耳部或听力相关,因此大多数患者似乎为其症状选择了合适的自我分诊途径。