Colson Eve R, Schaeffer Paula, Hauck Fern R, Provini Lauren, McClain Mary, Corwin Michael J, Drake Emily E, Kellams Ann L, Geller Nicole L, Tanabe Kawai, Moon Rachel Y
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 May;48(3):332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
To identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of safe sleep recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics from the perspective of hospital staff as part of a needs assessment that was used to design a successful quality improvement intervention to change clinical practice.
Qualitative design.
Multiple sites of three hospitals in the northeastern and southern United States.
We used purposeful sampling to identify 46 participants who cared for infants on inpatient hospital units (nurses and other staff members).
A qualitative researcher used grounded theory to moderate the focus groups. We constructed the initial interview guide and then changed it as needed to capture more information about new ideas as they arose. Researchers from diverse backgrounds participated in the analysis and used the constant comparative method to select important concepts and to develop codes and subsequent themes. We continued to collect data until saturation was reached.
We identified themes and subthemes, and the taxonomy fit into the Grol and Wensing framework for change in clinical practice. The six primary themes included The Innovation Itself, The Individual Health Care Professional, The Patient, The Social Context, The Organizational Context, and The Economic and Political Context.
Participants described facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for safe infant sleep. Identification of these themes informed our quality improvement intervention to promote safe infant sleep. Findings can be used by others when faced with the need for similar change.
从医院工作人员的角度确定美国儿科学会安全睡眠建议实施过程中的促进因素和障碍,作为需求评估的一部分,该评估用于设计一项成功的质量改进干预措施以改变临床实践。
定性设计。
美国东北部和南部三家医院的多个地点。
我们采用目的抽样法确定了46名在医院住院部照顾婴儿的参与者(护士和其他工作人员)。
一名定性研究人员运用扎根理论主持焦点小组讨论。我们构建了初始访谈指南,然后根据需要进行修改,以获取有关新出现的想法的更多信息。来自不同背景的研究人员参与了分析,并使用持续比较法选择重要概念并制定编码及后续主题。我们持续收集数据直至达到饱和状态。
我们确定了主题和子主题,并且该分类法符合Grol和Wensing的临床实践变革框架。六个主要主题包括创新本身、个体医疗保健专业人员、患者、社会背景、组织背景以及经济和政治背景。
参与者描述了美国儿科学会安全婴儿睡眠建议实施过程中的促进因素和障碍。确定这些主题为我们促进安全婴儿睡眠的质量改进干预措施提供了依据。当其他人面临类似变革需求时,这些研究结果可供他们使用。