• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持就地养老的技术:老年人的观点。

Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults' Perspectives.

作者信息

Wang Shengzhi, Bolling Khalisa, Mao Wenlin, Reichstadt Jennifer, Jeste Dilip, Kim Ho-Cheol, Nebeker Camille

机构信息

The Design Lab, Computer Science and Engineering, Jacobs School of Engineering, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Apr 10;7(2):60. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7020060.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare7020060
PMID:30974780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6627975/
Abstract

The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design process creates mismatches between technologies and older adults' needs. A user-centered design approach was used to identify older adults' perspectives regarding AAL and AI technologies and gauge interest in participating in a co-design process. A survey was used to obtain demographic characteristics and assess privacy perspectives. A convenience sample of 31 retirement community residents participated in one of two 90-min focus group sessions. The semi-structured group interview solicited barriers and facilitators to technology adoption, privacy attitudes, and interest in project co-design participation to inform technology development. Focus group sessions were audiotaped and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify themes and patterns. Descriptive statistics were applied to the quantitative data. Identified barriers to technology use included low technology literacy, including lack of familiarity with terminology, and physical challenges, which can make adoption difficult. Facilitators included an eagerness to learn, interest in co-design, and a desire to understand and control their data. Most participants identified as privacy pragmatics and fundamentalists, indicating that privacy is important to older adults. At the same time, they also reported a willingness to contribute to the design of technologies that would facilitate aging independently. There is a need to increase technology literacy of older adults along with aging literacy of technologists.

摘要

美国65岁以上的人口正在增加。大多数老年人更喜欢居家养老,而包括物联网(IoT)、环境/主动辅助生活(AAL)机器人和其他人工智能(AI)在内的技术可以支持独立生活。然而,自上而下的设计过程导致技术与老年人需求之间存在不匹配。采用以用户为中心的设计方法来确定老年人对AAL和AI技术的看法,并评估他们参与协同设计过程的兴趣。通过一项调查来获取人口统计学特征并评估隐私观念。一个由31名退休社区居民组成的便利样本参加了两个90分钟焦点小组会议中的一个。半结构化小组访谈征求了技术采用的障碍和促进因素、隐私态度以及对项目协同设计参与的兴趣,以为技术开发提供信息。焦点小组会议进行了录音并由专业人员转录。对转录本进行了审查和编码,以确定主题和模式。对定量数据应用了描述性统计。确定的技术使用障碍包括技术素养低,包括对术语不熟悉,以及身体上的挑战,这可能使采用变得困难。促进因素包括学习的热情、对协同设计的兴趣以及理解和控制自己数据的愿望。大多数参与者被认定为隐私实用主义者和原教旨主义者,这表明隐私对老年人很重要。与此同时,他们还表示愿意为有助于独立养老的技术设计做出贡献。有必要提高老年人的技术素养以及技术人员的老龄素养。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/ebce8b50a823/healthcare-07-00060-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/08e23f8e571f/healthcare-07-00060-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/9b1c8e2c0267/healthcare-07-00060-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/55f543db1666/healthcare-07-00060-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/d5ac58fafa10/healthcare-07-00060-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/ebce8b50a823/healthcare-07-00060-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/08e23f8e571f/healthcare-07-00060-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/9b1c8e2c0267/healthcare-07-00060-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/55f543db1666/healthcare-07-00060-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/d5ac58fafa10/healthcare-07-00060-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/6627975/ebce8b50a823/healthcare-07-00060-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults' Perspectives.支持就地养老的技术:老年人的观点。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Apr 10;7(2):60. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7020060.
2
Understanding Technology Preferences and Requirements for Health Information Technologies Designed to Improve and Maintain the Mental Health and Well-Being of Older Adults: Participatory Design Study.了解旨在改善和维持老年人心理健康与幸福感的健康信息技术的技术偏好和需求:参与式设计研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Jan 6;4(1):e21461. doi: 10.2196/21461.
3
Ambient Assisted Living: Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Models, Domains, Technology, and Concerns.环境辅助生活:人工智能模型、领域、技术和关注点的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 4;24(11):e36553. doi: 10.2196/36553.
4
Internet-of-Things Smart Home Technology to Support Aging-in-Place: Older Adults' Perceptions and Attitudes.物联网智能家居技术支持居家养老:老年人的看法和态度。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Apr;47(4):15-21. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20210310-03. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
Effectiveness of an Ambient Assisted Living (HomeAssist) Platform for Supporting Aging in Place of Older Adults With Frailty: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study.一个用于支持体弱老年人就地养老的环境辅助生活(家庭助手)平台的有效性:一项准实验研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 26;11(10):e33351. doi: 10.2196/33351.
6
Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities.对智能家居技术的需求:持续照料退休社区中老年人的观点
Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(3):195-201. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v16i3.694.
7
Attitudes and perspectives of older adults on technologies for assessing frailty in home settings: a focus group study.老年人对家庭环境中评估虚弱程度的技术的态度和看法:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 8;21(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02252-4.
8
Factors influencing community-dwelling older adults' readiness to adopt smart home technology: A qualitative exploratory study.影响社区居住的老年人采用智能家居技术准备度的因素:一项定性探索性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4847-4861. doi: 10.1111/jan.14996. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
Ambient Assisted Living: Identifying New Challenges and Needs for Digital Technologies and Service Innovation.环境辅助生活:识别数字技术和服务创新的新挑战和需求。
Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):141-149. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726492. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Acceptance and Privacy Perceptions Toward Video-based Active and Assisted Living Technologies: Scoping Review.接受度和隐私感知视角下的基于视频的主动和辅助生活技术:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 1;25:e45297. doi: 10.2196/45297.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for a co-design study for the development of a chronotherapeutic mobile health behaviour change intervention targeting light exposure among older adults.一项针对老年人光暴露的时辰治疗移动健康行为改变干预措施开发的联合设计研究方案。
F1000Res. 2025 Jul 25;13:1356. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157814.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Age-specific associations between intergenerational support from children and depression in middle-aged and elderly Chinese: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.中国中老年人中子女代际支持与抑郁之间的年龄特异性关联:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的结果
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 17;16:1621444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1621444. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model.理解影响老年人采用移动健康技术的因素:技术接受与使用统一理论模型的扩展
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
2
Age-Friendly Communities Initiative: Public Health Approach to Promoting Successful Aging.老年友好社区倡议:促进健康老龄化的公共卫生方法。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;24(12):1158-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Mobile and Wearable Technology Needs for Aging in Place: Perspectives from Older Adults and Their Caregivers and Providers.
Developing and evaluating an intelligent integration system for older adult care and health based on the sport-medicine-tourism model.
基于运动医学-旅游模式开发并评估一个针对老年人护理与健康的智能整合系统。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 11;13:1523893. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1523893. eCollection 2025.
4
Perspectives of older adults on the ethics of active assisted living technologies: A Scoping review and conceptual framework.老年人对主动辅助生活技术伦理的看法:一项范围综述和概念框架
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 10;11:20552076251336004. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336004. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Examining older adults' vulnerability to online health scams: insights from routine activity theory.审视老年人易受在线健康骗局影响的情况:基于日常活动理论的见解。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;13:1585851. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585851. eCollection 2025.
6
Comprehensive analysis of Australia's aged care system to inform policies for a sustainable future.对澳大利亚老年护理系统进行全面分析,以为可持续未来制定政策提供参考。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;13:1525988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1525988. eCollection 2025.
7
Impact of Bottom-Up Cocreation of Nursing Technological Innovations: Explorative Interview Study Among Hospital Nurses and Managers.护理技术创新自下而上共创的影响:对医院护士和管理人员的探索性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 31;12:e60543. doi: 10.2196/60543.
8
Understanding the Policy Space for AgeTech: Implications for AI and Digital Health.了解老年科技的政策空间:对人工智能和数字健康的影响。
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2024;34(4):144-149. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prae023. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
9
Learning Barriers, Engagement, and Interests Among Low-Income Latino Older Adults: Highlighting the Privilege of Learning and Retirement.低收入拉丁裔老年人的学习障碍、参与度和兴趣:凸显学习与退休的特权
J Aging Health. 2025 Mar;37(3-4_suppl):53S-65S. doi: 10.1177/08982643241309135. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
10
Nurses' perspectives on the adoption of new smart technologies for patient care: focus group interviews.护士对采用新型智能技术进行患者护理的看法:焦点小组访谈
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12578-z.
就地养老对移动和可穿戴技术的需求:老年人及其照顾者与服务提供者的观点
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:486-90.
4
What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders.成功实施就地养老技术所需的条件:与利益相关者的焦点小组讨论
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 3;18(5):e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5253.
5
Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: A systematic literature review.调查应用于帮助老年人的技术的有效性:一项系统的文献综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jan;85(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Who prefers to age in place? Cross-sectional survey of middle-aged people in Japan.谁更倾向于居家养老?日本中年人的横断面调查。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 May;16(5):631-7. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12503. Epub 2015 May 15.
7
Participatory Design With Seniors: Design of Future Services and Iterative Refinements of Interactive eHealth Services for Old Citizens.与老年人的参与式设计:面向老年人的未来服务设计及交互式电子健康服务的迭代优化
Med 2 0. 2013 Oct 8;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/med20.2729. eCollection 2013 Jul-Dec.
8
Cognitive decline after entering a nursing home: a 22-year follow-up study of institutionalized and noninstitutionalized elderly people.养老院入住后认知能力下降:对机构化和非机构化老年人的 22 年随访研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):504-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Decline in health for older adults: five-year change in 13 key measures of standardized health.老年人健康状况下降:13 项标准化健康关键指标的五年变化。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Sep;68(9):1059-67. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt038. Epub 2013 May 10.
10
Mobile health in emerging countries: a survey of research initiatives in Brazil.新兴国家的移动医疗:巴西研究计划调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):283-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 12.