Berger Kavita M, Wood James L N, Jenkins Bonnie, Olsen Jennifer, Morse Stephen S, Gresham Louise, Root J Jeffrey, Rush Margaret, Pigott David, Winkleman Taylor, Moore Melinda, Gillespie Thomas R, Nuzzo Jennifer B, Han Barbara A, Olinger Patricia, Karesh William B, Mills James N, Annelli Joseph F, Barnabei Jamie, Lucey Daniel, Hayman David T S
Gryphon Scientific, LLC, 6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 810, Takoma Park, MD 20912, USA.
Disease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 10;4(2):60. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed4020060.
The global burden of infectious diseases and the increased attention to natural, accidental, and deliberate biological threats has resulted in significant investment in infectious disease research. Translating the results of these studies to inform prevention, detection, and response efforts often can be challenging, especially if prior relationships and communications have not been established with decision-makers. Whatever scientific information is shared with decision-makers before, during, and after public health emergencies is highly dependent on the individuals or organizations who are communicating with policy-makers. This article briefly describes the landscape of stakeholders involved in information-sharing before and during emergencies. We identify critical gaps in translation of scientific expertise and results, and biosafety and biosecurity measures to public health policy and practice with a focus on One Health and zoonotic diseases. Finally, we conclude by exploring ways of improving communication and funding, both of which help to address the identified gaps. By leveraging existing scientific information (from both the natural and social sciences) in the public health decision-making process, large-scale outbreaks may be averted even in low-income countries.
传染病的全球负担以及对自然、意外和蓄意生物威胁的日益关注,已促使对传染病研究进行了大量投资。将这些研究结果转化为预防、检测和应对措施的依据往往具有挑战性,尤其是在之前未与决策者建立关系和沟通的情况下。在突发公共卫生事件之前、期间和之后与决策者分享的任何科学信息,高度依赖于与政策制定者进行沟通的个人或组织。本文简要描述了在紧急情况之前和期间参与信息共享的利益相关者情况。我们确定了科学专业知识和研究结果以及生物安全和生物安保措施向公共卫生政策和实践转化方面的关键差距,重点关注“同一健康”和人畜共患病。最后,我们通过探索改善沟通和资金投入的方法来得出结论,这两者都有助于弥补已确定的差距。通过在公共卫生决策过程中利用现有的(来自自然科学和社会科学的)科学信息,即使在低收入国家也可能避免大规模疫情爆发。