• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼唇修复中使用的缝合锚钉的细胞毒性和生物力学

Cytotoxicity and biomechanics of suture anchors used in labral repairs.

作者信息

Khoo John K, Lee Jae H T, Lam Patrick H, Wei Ai-Qun, Ronquillo Jonathan, Murrell George A C

机构信息

Orthopaedic Research Institute, St. George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

JSES Open Access. 2019 Mar 11;3(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.003. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.003
PMID:30976733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6443838/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biodegradable suture anchors are associated with higher redislocation rates. This study examined whether the biocompatibility and/or biomechanical properties of suture anchors contribute to the increase in complications.

METHODS

Human glenohumeral capsule cells were cultured with 4 types of suture anchors, Opus LabraFix (titanium alloy; ArthroCare, Austin, TX, USA), PushLock (poly-ether-ether-ketone; Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA), BioKnotless (poly-l-lactic acid; DePuy Mitek, Warsaw, IN, USA), and Suretac II (polyglycolic acid; Smith & Nephew, London, UK), to measure cell viability and pH. Four groups of 6 ovine shoulders were used to repair the labrum, which was completely detached from the glenoid rim anteroinferiorly and reattached with 2 suture anchors and subject to failure load testing.

RESULTS

In cell culture, BioKnotless at 48 and 72 hours (85.2% ± 2.1% and 84.5% ± 3.6%) and Suretac II groups (33.9% ± 3.1% and 42.8% ± 6.4%) had fewer viable cells compared with control ( = .048). The pH of Suretac II was lower than control (7.51 to 7.65) at 24 hours (7.31 ± 0.08,  = .049), 48 hours (7.25 ± 0.02,  = .046), and 72 hours (7.29 ± 0.04,  = .04). During mechanical testing, 83% of repairs failed by the capsule tearing. Among the anchors, the BioKnotless repair group had a significantly lower failure load (37 ± 5 N) compared with the PushLock (61 ± 7 N), Opus (60 ± 6 N), and Suretac II (57 ± 7 N) groups ( = .038).

CONCLUSION

BioKnotless and Suretac II anchors are cytotoxic. The BioKnotless biodegradable anchor has significantly lower failure load. Absorbable suture anchors may cause higher redislocation of arthroscopic Bankart repair.

摘要

背景

可生物降解的缝合锚钉与较高的再脱位率相关。本研究旨在探讨缝合锚钉的生物相容性和/或生物力学性能是否会导致并发症增加。

方法

将人肩盂关节囊细胞与4种类型的缝合锚钉一起培养,分别是Opus LabraFix(钛合金;美国德克萨斯州奥斯汀市的ArthroCare公司)、PushLock(聚醚醚酮;美国佛罗里达州那不勒斯市的Arthrex公司)、BioKnotless(聚-L-乳酸;美国印第安纳州华沙市的DePuy Mitek公司)和Suretac II(聚乙醇酸;英国伦敦的施乐辉公司),以测量细胞活力和pH值。使用四组,每组6个羊肩来修复盂唇,将盂唇从肩胛盂边缘前下方完全分离,并用2个缝合锚钉重新固定,然后进行失效载荷测试。

结果

在细胞培养中,与对照组相比,BioKnotless在48小时和72小时时(85.2%±2.1%和84.5%±3.6%)以及Suretac II组(33.9%±3.1%和42.8%±6.4%)的活细胞较少(P =.048)。Suretac II在24小时(7.31±0.08,P =.049)、48小时(7.25±0.02,P =.046)和72小时(7.29±0.04,P =.04)时的pH值低于对照组(7.51至7.65)。在力学测试中,83%的修复因关节囊撕裂而失败。在这些锚钉中,BioKnotless修复组的失效载荷(37±5 N)明显低于PushLock组(61±7 N)、Opus组(60±6 N)和Suretac II组(57±7 N)(P =.038)。

结论

BioKnotless和Suretac II锚钉具有细胞毒性。BioKnotless可生物降解锚钉的失效载荷明显较低。可吸收缝合锚钉可能会导致关节镜下Bankart修复术后更高的再脱位率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/e81496336e7c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/fccb1c35ef08/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/aa89fd7aec7b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/44ee351985fe/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/e81496336e7c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/fccb1c35ef08/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/aa89fd7aec7b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/44ee351985fe/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57df/6443838/e81496336e7c/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Cytotoxicity and biomechanics of suture anchors used in labral repairs.髋臼唇修复中使用的缝合锚钉的细胞毒性和生物力学
JSES Open Access. 2019 Mar 11;3(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.003. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors.可生物降解的关节盂锚钉的循环载荷测试与极限破坏强度
Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions.
Arthroscopy. 2005 May;21(5):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.012.
4
Biomechanical stability of knotless suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair in healthy and osteopenic bone.用于肩袖修复的无结缝线锚钉在健康骨和骨质疏松骨中的生物力学稳定性。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug;26(8):1035-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 May 13.
5
Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.无结缝线锚钉与标准缝线锚钉在Ⅱ型SLAP损伤修复中的生物力学比较
Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.019. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
6
Arthroscopic Bankart repair using Knotless or BioKnotless suture anchors: 2- to 7-year results.使用无结或生物无结缝线锚钉进行关节镜下Bankart修复术:2至7年的结果
Arthroscopy. 2007 Apr;23(4):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.024.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair.经典实心和新型全软缝线锚钉修复肩盂唇的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.024. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Poly-L/D-lactic acid anchors are associated with reoperation and failure of SLAP repairs.聚-L/D-乳酸锚与再手术和 SLAP 修复失败相关。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Oct;27(10):1335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.021. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
9
Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.肩袖和关节盂锚定物拔出强度的生物力学分析:2011 年更新。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jul;27(7):895-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.016.
10
Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.II型SLAP损伤的无结锚钉修复与单纯缝线修复的生物力学比较
Arthroscopy. 2009 Oct;25(10):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Degradation behavior of ZE21C magnesium alloy suture anchors and their effect on ligament-bone junction repair.ZE21C镁合金缝合锚钉的降解行为及其对韧带-骨结合部修复的影响。
Bioact Mater. 2023 Feb 27;26:128-141. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.021. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
The Application of Biomechanics Combined with Human Body Structure in Volleyball Technical Analysis.生物力学与人体结构在排球技术分析中的应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 18;2022:5287538. doi: 10.1155/2022/5287538. eCollection 2022.
3
Knotless PEEK and double-loaded biodegradable suture anchors ensure comparable clinical outcomes in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective randomized study.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of the Bankart and Latarjet repairs: a systematic review.Bankart修复术和Latarjet修复术的长期疗效:一项系统评价
Open Access J Sports Med. 2017 Apr 15;8:97-105. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S106983. eCollection 2017.
2
Long-Term Restoration of Anterior Shoulder Stability: A Retrospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet Procedure.长期恢复肩关节前向稳定性:关节镜下 Bankart 修复与开放式 Latarjet 手术的回顾性分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 7;98(23):1954-1961. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01398.
3
Coracoid bone block versus arthroscopic Bankart repair: a comparative paired study with 5-year follow-up.
无结聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和双加载可生物降解缝线锚钉在关节镜治疗创伤性前肩不稳定中的临床结果相当:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3835-3841. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06969-6. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Comparison between all-suture and biocomposite anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A retrospective cohort study.关节镜下治疗创伤性前肩不稳时全缝线锚钉与生物复合材料锚钉的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Orthop. 2021 Mar 27;24:264-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.03.011. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
喙突骨块与关节镜下 Bankart 修复术比较:5 年随访的配对对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Apr;99(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
4
Adverse reactions to an absorbable shoulder fixation device.可吸收性肩部固定装置的不良反应。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Jul;3(4):230-3. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80040-2. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
5
Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up.关节镜下使用缝合锚钉进行肩关节稳定术的长期疗效:8 至 10 年随访结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2396-403. doi: 10.1177/0363546511415657. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
6
Evaluation of cell cycle arrest in estrogen responsive MCF-7 breast cancer cells: pitfalls of the MTS assay.评价雌激素反应性 MCF-7 乳腺癌细胞的细胞周期停滞:MTS 检测法的缺陷。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020623. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
7
Comparison between metal and biodegradable suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective randomized study.金属和可生物降解缝线锚在创伤性前肩不稳定关节镜治疗中的比较:前瞻性随机研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Dec;18(12):1785-91. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1212-3. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
8
Limitations of MTT and MTS-based assays for measurement of antiproliferative activity of green tea polyphenols.MTT 和 MTS 法测定绿茶多酚抗增殖活性的局限性。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 16;5(4):e10202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010202.
9
Glenoid rim fracture in contact athletes with absorbable suture anchor reconstruction.接触性运动员肩盂边缘骨折的可吸收缝线锚钉重建
Arthroscopy. 2009 May;25(5):560-2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.027. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
10
Use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors and associated accelerated shoulder arthropathy: report of 3 cases.生物可吸收无结缝合锚钉的使用及相关的加速性肩关节病:3例报告
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):1429-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546509332248. Epub 2009 Mar 27.