Barbet Jacques, Huclier-Markai Sandrine
GIP Arronax, Saint-Herblain Cedex, France.
Laboratoire Subatech, UMR 6457, Ecole des Mines de Nantes/CNRS/IN2P3/Université de Nantes, Nantes Cedex 3, France.
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):513-525. doi: 10.1002/pst.1943. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
The interaction between ligands and receptors is often described in terms of 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50). However, IC50 values do not accurately reflect the dissociation constants (Kd), and the domain of application and precision of proposed approximations for Kd estimation are unclear. The effect of affinity and of experimental conditions on the differences between IC50 and Kd has been assessed from exact mass action law calculations and from computer simulations. Competitions between [ In]DTPA-indium and a few metal-DTPA complexes for binding to a specific antibody are discussed as a practical example. Exact calculations of competition assays have been implemented in Microsoft Excel and performed for a variety of concentrations of receptor, tracer, and competitor. The results are identical to those of software packages. IC50 is found larger than Kd by less than 20% only when tracer concentration is small compared with Kd and to the receptor concentration and when this receptor concentration is small compared with Kd. Otherwise, Kd and IC50 may be very different and approximations proposed in the literature to obtain Kd values from graphically derived IC50 are not acceptable as soon as the concentrations of tracer or of receptor approach Kd. Under most experimental conditions, IC50 values do not reflect Kd values. Using available software packages to determine and report Kd values would allow for more meaningful comparisons of results obtained under different experimental conditions.
配体与受体之间的相互作用通常用50%抑制浓度(IC50)来描述。然而,IC50值并不能准确反映解离常数(Kd),而且用于估算Kd的近似方法的应用范围和精度尚不清楚。通过精确的质量作用定律计算和计算机模拟,评估了亲和力和实验条件对IC50与Kd差异的影响。作为一个实际例子,讨论了[In]DTPA-铟与几种金属-DTPA络合物在结合特异性抗体方面的竞争。竞争分析的精确计算已在Microsoft Excel中实现,并针对各种浓度的受体、示踪剂和竞争者进行了计算。结果与软件包的结果相同。只有当示踪剂浓度与Kd相比以及与受体浓度相比都很小时,且该受体浓度与Kd相比也很小时,才会发现IC50比Kd大不到20%。否则,Kd和IC50可能会有很大差异,一旦示踪剂或受体的浓度接近Kd,文献中提出的从图形得出的IC50来获取Kd值的近似方法就不可接受。在大多数实验条件下,IC50值不能反映Kd值。使用现有的软件包来确定和报告Kd值将有助于更有意义地比较在不同实验条件下获得的结果。