• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性髋关节假体二期翻修失败的危险因素:文献回顾与单中心队列分析。

Risk factors for failure of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip prosthesis: review of the literature and single centre cohort analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Apr;23(2 Suppl):65-75. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17476.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_201904_17476
PMID:30977873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are one of the most dangerous complications in hip surgery. "Two-stage" revision surgery is the treatment of choice. Nevertheless, 5-10% of failures are reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate which factors determine the failure of the two-stage revision in patients affected by hip PJI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 21 patients treated for hip PJI who had undergone two-stage revision surgery. The diagnosis had been made using criteria established by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) and readapted by the Philadelphia Consensus Conference group. The patients underwent periodic clinical and laboratory controls after the surgical procedure. The two-stage revision treatment was considered unsuccessful in the event of re-infection or in case of severe complications occurring within one year from the treatment.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 23.8 months 57% healed with no complications. The reinfection rate was 19% and, after the 3rd stage, the final failure rate was 9.5%. The study has shown, with statistical significance, that a greater number of previous surgical procedures (p<0.05, OR=22) and BMI>25 (p<0.05, OR=4) represent increased risk factors in predicting the failure of two-stage revision surgery. Age, CRP, ESR and a shorter lapse (<60 days) between 1st and 2nd stage were recorded in the failure cases, and have to be considered, even if not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowing the factors responsible for the increased failure of two-stage revision could lead to closer monitoring and more aggressive management in those patients expected to be at greater risk of reinfection. Obesity and multiple surgeries are risk factors for failure.

摘要

目的

人工关节周围感染(PJI)是髋关节手术中最危险的并发症之一。“二期”翻修手术是首选治疗方法。然而,仍有 5-10%的病例报告失败。本研究旨在评估哪些因素决定了髋关节 PJI 患者二期翻修的失败。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了 21 例接受髋关节 PJI 二期翻修手术的患者。该诊断采用了由肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS)制定并经费城共识会议组改编的标准。术后患者定期进行临床和实验室检查。如果在治疗后一年内发生再感染或出现严重并发症,则认为二期翻修治疗失败。

结果

在平均 23.8 个月的随访中,57%的患者治愈且无并发症。再感染率为 19%,在第 3 期后,最终失败率为 9.5%。研究表明,手术次数较多(p<0.05,OR=22)和 BMI>25(p<0.05,OR=4)具有统计学意义,是预测二期翻修手术失败的危险因素。在失败病例中记录到年龄、CRP、ESR 和第 1 期和第 2 期之间的较短间隔(<60 天),尽管这些因素没有统计学意义,但也需要考虑。

结论

了解导致二期翻修失败风险增加的因素,可以使那些预期有更高再感染风险的患者得到更密切的监测和更积极的管理。肥胖和多次手术是失败的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for failure of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip prosthesis: review of the literature and single centre cohort analysis.感染性髋关节假体二期翻修失败的危险因素:文献回顾与单中心队列分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Apr;23(2 Suppl):65-75. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17476.
2
What are the Factors Associated with Re-revision After One-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A Case-control Study.哪些因素与髋关节假体周围感染一期翻修术后再次翻修有关?一项病例对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2258-2263. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000780.
3
Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?在两阶段翻修关节成形术再次植入时,冰冻切片和微卫星不稳定性(MSIS)标准是否可靠?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1619-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4673-3.
4
Positive Alpha-defensin at Reimplantation of a Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty Is Not Associated with Infection at 1 Year.二期翻修关节成形术中再植入时的阳性α-防御素与 1 年内的感染无关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1615-1621. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000620.
5
Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic hip re-infection.重复双阶段髋关节置换术治疗人工髋关节假体感染。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Sep;100-B(9):1157-1161. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0470.R1.
6
Does Change in ESR and CRP Guide the Timing of Two-stage Arthroplasty Reimplantation?血沉和 C 反应蛋白的变化是否指导两阶段关节置换翻修的时机?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):364-371. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533618.31937.45.
7
Long-term clinical outcome of two-stage revision surgery for infected hip arthroplasty using cement spacer: Culture negative versus culture positive.使用骨水泥间隔物的感染性髋关节置换二期翻修手术的长期临床结果:培养阴性与培养阳性对比。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017754095. doi: 10.1177/2309499017754095.
8
Microbiological profile and outcomes of two-stage revision hip arthroplasty.两阶段翻修髋关节置换术的微生物学特征及结果
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):67-71. doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_19_25.
9
Results at 10-24 years after single-stage revision arthroplasty of infected total hip arthroplasty in patients under 45 years of age.45 岁以下患者接受一期翻修术治疗感染性全髋关节置换术后 10-24 年的结果。
Hip Int. 2021 Mar;31(2):237-241. doi: 10.1177/1120700019888877. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
[Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection of the Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Two Methods].[全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染的两阶段翻修术:两种方法的比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(3):179-185.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted hip and knee revision arthroplasty: A scoping review.机器人辅助髋关节和膝关节翻修置换术:一项范围综述。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 26;12(2):e70285. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70285. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Predictive Factors for Risk of Reinfection in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.全髋关节和膝关节置换术感染性二期翻修中再次感染风险的预测因素
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;14(2):167. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14020167.
3
Material-based treatment strategies against intraosseous implant biofilm infection.
针对骨内种植体生物膜感染的基于材料的治疗策略。
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024 Jun 30;39:101764. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101764. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Clinical and radiological outcomes and analysis of failures of modular revisions stems at long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.模块化翻修柄长期随访的临床和影像学结果及失败分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Jt. 2023 Nov 25;9:1. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-32. eCollection 2024.
5
Changes in serum inflammatory factors after hip arthroplasty and analysis of risk factors for prosthesis loosening.髋关节置换术后血清炎症因子变化及假体松动危险因素分析
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):557-566. doi: 10.62347/NXYD3115. eCollection 2024.
6
Phage therapy in prosthetic joint infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus - A literature review.金黄色葡萄球菌引起的人工关节感染中的噬菌体疗法——文献综述
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2024 Mar 4;14(2):75-85. doi: 10.1556/1886.2024.00010. Print 2024 May 14.
7
Effectiveness of two-stage revision with commercial polymethylmethacrylate articulated hip spacer: similar outcomes against monomicrobial and polymicrobial hip periprosthetic joint infections.使用商用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯人工髋关节间隔物进行两阶段翻修术的有效性:针对单一微生物和多微生物髋关节假体周围感染的相似结果。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2023 Feb 6;8(1):51-57. doi: 10.5194/jbji-8-51-2023. eCollection 2023.
8
Influence of the Type of Bone Cement Used in Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periarticular Joint Infection on the Spacer Replacement and Reinfection Rate.用于慢性关节周围感染二期翻修关节成形术的骨水泥类型对间隔器置换及再感染率的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 11;12(2):600. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020600.
9
Long Term Results of Two-Stage Revision for Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Multicenter Study.慢性人工髋关节感染两阶段翻修的长期结果:一项多中心研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061657.
10
Successful Use of Salvage Bacteriophage Therapy for a Recalcitrant MRSA Knee and Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection.挽救性噬菌体疗法成功用于治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的顽固性膝关节和髋关节假体关节感染。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Jan 31;15(2):177. doi: 10.3390/ph15020177.