• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性人工髋关节感染两阶段翻修的长期结果:一项多中心研究

Long Term Results of Two-Stage Revision for Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Multicenter Study.

作者信息

Kildow Beau J, Springer Bryan D, Brown Timothy S, Lyden Elizabeth, Fehring Thomas K, Garvin Kevin L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, NC 27707, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061657.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11061657
PMID:35329983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8952569/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard in the United States for treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Long-term reinfection rates and clinical outcomes with sufficient subject numbers remain limited. The purpose was to evaluate the long-term outcomes following two-stage exchange following hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 221 patients who underwent two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for chronic PJI at three large tertiary referral institutions from 1990-2015. Outcomes including reinfection, mortality, and all-cause revision were calculated. Cumulative incidence of reinfection with death as competing factor was also calculated. Risk factors for reinfection were determined using Cox multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Rate of infection eradication and all-cause revision was 88.24% and 22.6%, respectively. Overall mortality rate was 40.72%. Patients with minimum five-year follow-up ( = 129) had a success rate of 91.47% with mortality rate of 41.1%. Major risk factors for reinfection included polymicrobial infection (HR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.08-5.14) and antibiotic resistant organism (HR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.10-5.04).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series with greater than 5-year follow-up evaluating outcomes of two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty. This technique resulted in a relatively high infection eradication, however, the mortality rate is alarmingly high. Antibiotic resistant organisms appear to be highest risk factor for failure.

摘要

背景

在美国,两阶段翻修关节成形术仍是治疗慢性假体周围关节感染(PJI)的金标准。关于足够样本量的长期再感染率和临床结果的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在评估髋关节置换术后两阶段翻修的长期结果。

方法

回顾性分析了1990年至2015年期间在三家大型三级转诊机构接受两阶段翻修髋关节置换术治疗慢性PJI的221例患者。计算了包括再感染、死亡率和全因翻修在内的结果。还计算了以死亡为竞争因素的再感染累积发生率。使用Cox多变量回归分析确定再感染的危险因素。

结果

感染根除率和全因翻修率分别为88.24%和22.6%。总死亡率为40.72%。随访至少五年的患者(n = 129)成功率为91.47%,死亡率为41.1%。再感染的主要危险因素包括混合感染(HR = 2.36,95% CI:1.08 - 5.14)和抗生素耐药菌(HR = 2.36,95% CI:1.10 - 5.04)。

结论

这是最大的一组随访超过5年的评估两阶段翻修髋关节置换术结果的系列研究。该技术导致相对较高的感染根除率,然而,死亡率高得惊人。抗生素耐药菌似乎是失败的最高风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/a285ae7abd91/jcm-11-01657-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/2ca6c6a24301/jcm-11-01657-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/b2cd99825a6e/jcm-11-01657-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/53fd1b2a54f6/jcm-11-01657-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/a285ae7abd91/jcm-11-01657-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/2ca6c6a24301/jcm-11-01657-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/b2cd99825a6e/jcm-11-01657-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/53fd1b2a54f6/jcm-11-01657-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efa0/8952569/a285ae7abd91/jcm-11-01657-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Long Term Results of Two-Stage Revision for Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Multicenter Study.慢性人工髋关节感染两阶段翻修的长期结果:一项多中心研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061657.
2
Long Term Results of Two-Stage Revision for Chronic Periprosthetic Knee Infection: A Multicenter Study.慢性人工膝关节感染两阶段翻修术的长期结果:一项多中心研究
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6S):S327-S332. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.029. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
3
Long-Term Results of a 2-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in 164 Hips.164 髋人工全髋关节置换术后二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的长期疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 2;101(1):74-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01103.
4
Two-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in 245 Knees without Prior Treatment for Infection.245 例初次全膝关节置换术后无感染前期治疗的假体周围关节感染的两阶段置换协议。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):239-249. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356.
5
Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?水泥型全髋关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的两阶段翻修:失败风险增加?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4481-4490. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
A Low Percentage of Patients Satisfy Typical Indications for Single-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection.仅有低比例的患者满足慢性假体周围关节感染一期翻修术的典型适应证。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Aug;478(8):1780-1786. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001243.
7
One-stage exchange should be avoided in periprosthetic joint infection cases with massive femoral bone loss or with history of any failed revision to treat periprosthetic joint infection.对于存在大量股骨骨缺损或既往任何翻修治疗假体周围关节感染失败的假体周围关节感染病例,应避免一期翻修。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7):1247-1253. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2155.R1.
8
Irrigation, Débridement, and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.一期翻修治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修术后复发的冲洗、清创和假体保留:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
9
One-stage revision is as effective as two-stage revision for chronic culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.一期翻修与二期翻修治疗全髋关节和膝关节置换术后慢性非培养性假体周围关节感染同样有效。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Mar;103-B(3):515-521. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-1480.R2. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
10
What are the Factors Associated with Re-revision After One-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A Case-control Study.哪些因素与髋关节假体周围感染一期翻修术后再次翻修有关?一项病例对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2258-2263. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000780.

引用本文的文献

1
-species-associated periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections - a 15-year cohort analysis.与物种相关的人工髋关节和膝关节感染——一项15年队列分析
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Aug 11;10(4):265-275. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-265-2025. eCollection 2025.
2
Mid-term to long-term outcome and risk factors for failure of 158 hips with two-stage revision for periprosthetic hip joint infection.158例髋关节假体周围感染二期翻修术后中期至长期结局及失败危险因素
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Feb 11;10(1):15-24. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-15-2025. eCollection 2025.
3
Bacteriophage Dosing and Its Effect on Bacterial Growth Suppression in a Model: An Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection.人工关节感染治疗中的并发症。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6_Supple_A):145-150. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1582.R1.
2
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With High Attrition Rate and Mortality.初次全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染行二期翻修术与高损耗率和高死亡率相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1384-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.005. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
3
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Rate and Reason for the Attrition After the First Stage.
噬菌体给药及其在模型中对细菌生长抑制的影响:一项研究。
Phage (New Rochelle). 2024 Dec 18;5(4):223-229. doi: 10.1089/phage.2024.0001. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Long-Term Outcome of Treating Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection with Local Antibiotics Delivered Through Antibiotic-Impregnated Calcium Hydroxyapatite.通过抗生素浸渍的羟基磷灰石输送局部抗生素治疗人工髋关节周围感染的长期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 8;13(23):7469. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237469.
5
Assessment of Bacteriophage Pharmacokinetic Parameters After Intra-Articular Delivery in a Rat Prosthetic Joint Infection Model.关节内给药后噬菌体药代动力学参数在大鼠人工关节感染模型中的评估。
Viruses. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):1800. doi: 10.3390/v16111800.
6
The presence of a sinus tract is associated with reinfection after two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection: a case-control study.窦道的存在与髋关节假体感染二期翻修术后再感染相关:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 7;25(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07840-0.
7
Local Antibiotic Infusion in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的局部抗生素灌注
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4848. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164848.
8
Comparison of Five-Day vs. Fourteen-Day Incubation of Cultures for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术中用于诊断假体周围关节感染的培养物五日培养与十四日培养的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 30;13(15):4467. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154467.
9
Utility of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.清创术、抗生素和植入物保留在翻修全膝关节置换术治疗急性假体周围关节感染中的应用。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):79-84.
10
How Effective Is Phage Therapy for Prosthetic Joint Infections? A Preliminary Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis of Early Outcomes.噬菌体疗法治疗人工关节感染的效果如何?早期结局的初步系统评价和比例荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 9;60(5):790. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050790.
两阶段关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染:一期手术后的磨损率及原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2749-2756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
4
How Does Mortality Risk Change Over Time After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?髋关节和膝关节置换术后,死亡率风险随时间如何变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1414-1421. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000673.
5
Risk factors for failure of two-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip prosthesis: review of the literature and single centre cohort analysis.感染性髋关节假体二期翻修失败的危险因素:文献回顾与单中心队列分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Apr;23(2 Suppl):65-75. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17476.
6
Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Infection Is Associated with a High Rate of Dislocation.髋关节置换术后感染的两期翻修与高脱位率相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 20;101(4):322-329. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00124.
7
Two-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in 245 Knees without Prior Treatment for Infection.245 例初次全膝关节置换术后无感染前期治疗的假体周围关节感染的两阶段置换协议。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):239-249. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356.
8
Long-Term Results of a 2-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in 164 Hips.164 髋人工全髋关节置换术后二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的长期疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 2;101(1):74-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01103.
9
Risk Factors and Treatment Options for Failure of a Two-Stage Exchange.两阶段翻修失败的危险因素及治疗选择
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):420-427. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9504-1.
10
Two-stage revision for the culture-negative infected total hip arthroplasty : A comparative study.两阶段翻修术治疗培养阴性感染性全髋关节置换术:一项比较研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):3-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0626.R1.