• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯有限样本极大值法预测野火规模极值的时空动态。

Spatiotemporal prediction of wildfire size extremes with Bayesian finite sample maxima.

机构信息

Earth Lab, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Suite S348 611 UCB, Boulder, Colorado, 80303, USA.

Department of Geography, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 3021, Moscow, Idaho, 83844-3021, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2019 Sep;29(6):e01898. doi: 10.1002/eap.1898. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1002/eap.1898
PMID:30980779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6851762/
Abstract

Wildfires are becoming more frequent in parts of the globe, but predicting where and when wildfires occur remains difficult. To predict wildfire extremes across the contiguous United States, we integrate a 30-yr wildfire record with meteorological and housing data in spatiotemporal Bayesian statistical models with spatially varying nonlinear effects. We compared different distributions for the number and sizes of large fires to generate a posterior predictive distribution based on finite sample maxima for extreme events (the largest fires over bounded spatiotemporal domains). A zero-inflated negative binomial model for fire counts and a lognormal model for burned areas provided the best performance. This model attains 99% interval coverage for the number of fires and 93% coverage for fire sizes over a six year withheld data set. Dryness and air temperature strongly predict extreme wildfire probabilities. Housing density has a hump-shaped relationship with fire occurrence, with more fires occurring at intermediate housing densities. Statistically, these drivers affect the chance of an extreme wildfire in two ways: by altering fire size distributions, and by altering fire frequency, which influences sampling from the tails of fire size distributions. We conclude that recent extremes should not be surprising, and that the contiguous United States may be on the verge of even larger wildfire extremes.

摘要

野火在全球部分地区变得越来越频繁,但预测野火发生的地点和时间仍然很困难。为了预测美国大陆的野火极端事件,我们将 30 年的野火记录与气象和住房数据整合到时空贝叶斯统计模型中,其中包含空间变化的非线性效应。我们比较了不同的分布,用于确定大火数量和规模,以基于有限样本最大值生成极端事件(有限时空域内最大的火灾)的后验预测分布。零膨胀负二项式模型用于火灾数量,对数正态模型用于燃烧面积,可提供最佳性能。该模型在六年保留数据集中,对火灾数量的 99%区间和火灾规模的 93%区间具有覆盖率。干燥度和空气温度强烈预测极端野火的概率。住房密度与火灾发生呈驼峰形关系,在中等住房密度下发生的火灾更多。从统计学上讲,这些驱动因素通过改变火灾规模分布和影响火灾频率(影响火灾规模分布尾部的抽样),以两种方式影响极端野火的发生概率。我们的结论是,最近的极端事件不应令人惊讶,而且美国大陆可能即将迎来更大规模的野火极端事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/cec050fe73e6/EAP-29-na-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/eef7b4d47f59/EAP-29-na-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/db631afc2f61/EAP-29-na-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/68e0230db77e/EAP-29-na-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/29f833d8f72c/EAP-29-na-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/7c6c10976273/EAP-29-na-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/9937a059ff8a/EAP-29-na-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/c4040e1bdf36/EAP-29-na-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/44c234a44b9f/EAP-29-na-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/ae203d20abe4/EAP-29-na-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/2f007f6049c4/EAP-29-na-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/3ea874610699/EAP-29-na-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/cec050fe73e6/EAP-29-na-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/eef7b4d47f59/EAP-29-na-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/db631afc2f61/EAP-29-na-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/68e0230db77e/EAP-29-na-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/29f833d8f72c/EAP-29-na-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/7c6c10976273/EAP-29-na-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/9937a059ff8a/EAP-29-na-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/c4040e1bdf36/EAP-29-na-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/44c234a44b9f/EAP-29-na-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/ae203d20abe4/EAP-29-na-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/2f007f6049c4/EAP-29-na-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/3ea874610699/EAP-29-na-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/6851762/cec050fe73e6/EAP-29-na-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatiotemporal prediction of wildfire size extremes with Bayesian finite sample maxima.贝叶斯有限样本极大值法预测野火规模极值的时空动态。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Sep;29(6):e01898. doi: 10.1002/eap.1898. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
2
Prediction of regional wildfire activity in the probabilistic Bayesian framework of Firelihood.在 Firelihood 的概率贝叶斯框架中预测区域野火活动。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jul;31(5):e02316. doi: 10.1002/eap.2316. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
3
Burn me twice, shame on who? Interactions between successive forest fires across a temperate mountain region.两度被烧伤,羞煞谁?温带山区连续森林火灾间的相互作用。
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2272-2282. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1439.
4
Fuel reduction burning reduces wildfire severity during extreme fire events in south-eastern Australia.林火燃烧减少措施降低了澳大利亚东南部极端火灾事件中的野火严重程度。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 1;343:118171. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118171. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Dynamic prediction of global monthly burned area with hybrid deep neural networks.利用混合深度神经网络对全球每月火烧面积进行动态预测。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jul;32(5):e2610. doi: 10.1002/eap.2610. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Drivers and implications of the extreme 2022 wildfire season in Southwest Europe.2022 年西南欧极端野火季节的驱动因素及其影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 10;859(Pt 2):160320. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160320. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
7
Fuel treatment effectiveness in the context of landform, vegetation, and large, wind-driven wildfires.在地形、植被和大型、风力驱动的野火背景下的燃料处理效果。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jul;30(5):e02104. doi: 10.1002/eap.2104. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
8
The impact of wildfires on air pollution and health across land use categories in Brazil over a 16-year period.16年间巴西野火对不同土地利用类型地区空气污染和健康的影响。
Environ Res. 2023 May 1;224:115522. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115522. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
9
Wildfire prediction using zero-inflated negative binomial mixed models: Application to Spain.利用零膨胀负二项混合模型进行野火预测:在西班牙的应用。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 15;328:116788. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116788. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
Evidence of increasing wildfire damage with decreasing property price in Southern California fires.在南加州火灾中,随着房产价格下降野火破坏加剧的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 24;19(4):e0300346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300346. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Gradient boosting with extreme-value theory for wildfire prediction.基于极值理论的梯度提升用于野火预测。
Extremes (Boston). 2023;26(2):273-299. doi: 10.1007/s10687-022-00454-6. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
2
Assessing dependence between frequency and severity through shared random effects.通过共享随机效应评估频率和严重程度之间的依赖性。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 19;17(8):e0271904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271904. eCollection 2022.
3
U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s.在21世纪,美国火灾的规模变得更大、频率更高、分布更广。

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk.美国城乡交错带的快速发展增加了野火风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 27;115(13):3314-3319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718850115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Human presence diminishes the importance of climate in driving fire activity across the United States.人类活动的存在降低了气候在美国各地驱动火灾活动的重要性。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 18;8(11):eabc0020. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0020. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Machine Learning Methods and Synthetic Data Generation to Predict Large Wildfires.机器学习方法和合成数据生成技术预测大型野火。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 26;21(11):3694. doi: 10.3390/s21113694.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 26;114(52):13750-13755. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713885114. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
4
Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States.人为引发的野火在美国扩大了火灾生态位。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 14;114(11):2946-2951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617394114. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
High resolution global gridded data for use in population studies.高分辨率全球网格化数据,用于人口研究。
Sci Data. 2017 Jan 31;4:170001. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.1.
6
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.人为气候变化对美国西部森林野火的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11770-11775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607171113. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring.美国西部森林野火活动增加:对春季时间变化的敏感性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 5;371(1696). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0178.
8
Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure.野火烟雾暴露对健康影响的批判性综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Sep;124(9):1334-43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409277. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework.美国本土的生态区:一个层次化空间框架的演变
Environ Manage. 2014 Dec;54(6):1249-66. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Relationships between human population density and burned area at continental and global scales.大陆和全球尺度上人类人口密度与火烧面积之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e81188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081188. eCollection 2013.