Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, France.
University of Lorraine, Metz, France.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Dec;45(12):1681-1701. doi: 10.1177/0146167219841621. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
Induced hypocrisy is a sequential, two-step, cognitive dissonance procedure that prompts individuals to adopt a proattitudinal behavior. The present meta-analysis of 29 published and nine unpublished induced-hypocrisy studies enabled us to test three key dissonance-related issues. First, is hypocrisy effective in promoting change in behavioral intention and behavior? Our analyses supported the idea that hypocrisy (vs. control) increased both behavioral intention and behavior. Second, does hypocrisy generate psychological discomfort? Results pertaining to this issue were inconclusive due to the small number of studies measuring psychological discomfort. Third, are both steps necessary to generate change? Effect sizes conform to the idea that the transgressions-only condition can increase both behavior and intention. Our meta-analysis raises a number of theoretical issues concerning the psychological processes underlying induced hypocrisy and highlights implications for practitioners.
诱导虚伪是一种顺序的、两步的、认知失调的程序,它促使个体采取亲态度的行为。本研究对 29 项已发表和 9 项未发表的诱导虚伪研究进行了荟萃分析,使我们能够检验三个与失调相关的关键问题。第一,虚伪在促进行为意向和行为的改变方面是否有效?我们的分析支持这样一种观点,即虚伪(与控制相比)增加了行为意向和行为。第二,虚伪是否会产生心理不适?由于测量心理不适的研究数量较少,因此关于这个问题的结果尚无定论。第三,两个步骤都有必要产生变化吗?效应大小符合这样一种观点,即仅违规条件就能增加行为和意图。我们的荟萃分析提出了一些关于诱导虚伪背后的心理过程的理论问题,并强调了对实践者的意义。