Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université du Québec, 531 Boul. des Prairies, Laval, Québec H7V 1B7, Canada.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, 2375, Chemin de la Côte Ste-Catherine, Montréal, Québec H3T 1A8, Canada.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Jul 24;63(6):701-705. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz026.
BACKGROUND: Work histories generally cover all jobs held for ≥1 year. However, it may be time and cost prohibitive to conduct a detailed exposure assessment for each such job. While disregarding short-term jobs can reduce the assessment burden, this can be problematic if those jobs contribute important exposure information towards understanding disease aetiology. OBJECTIVE: To characterize short-term jobs, defined as lasting more than 1 year, but less than 2 years, in a population-based study conducted in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: In 2005-2012, we collected work histories for some 4000 participants in a case-control study of prostate cancer. Overall, subjects had held 19 462 paid jobs lasting ≥1 year, including 3655 short-term jobs. Using information from interviews and from the Canadian Classification and Dictionary of Occupations, we characterized short-term jobs and compared them to jobs held ≥2 years. RESULTS: Short-term jobs represented <4% of subjects' work years on average. Forty-five per cent of subjects had at least one short-term job; of these, 49% had one, 24% had two, and 27% had at least three. Half of all short-term jobs had been held before the age of 24. Short-term jobs entailed more often exposure to fumes, odours, dust, and/or poor ventilation than longer jobs (17 versus 13%), as well as outdoor work (10 versus 5%) and heavy physical activity (16 versus 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term jobs occurred often in early careers and more frequently entailed potentially hazardous exposures than longer-held jobs. However, as they represented a small proportion of work years, excluding them should have a marginal impact on lifetime exposure assessment.
背景:工作经历通常涵盖所有持续时间≥1 年的工作。然而,对每一份工作进行详细的暴露评估可能既耗时又昂贵。虽然忽略短期工作可以减轻评估负担,但如果这些工作提供了重要的暴露信息,从而有助于理解疾病的病因,那么这种做法可能会有问题。
目的:描述在加拿大蒙特利尔进行的一项基于人群的研究中的短期工作,即持续时间超过 1 年但少于 2 年的工作。
方法:在 2005-2012 年,我们对一些 4000 名前列腺癌病例对照研究的参与者收集了工作经历。总体而言,受试者共从事过 19462 份持续时间≥1 年的有偿工作,其中包括 3655 份短期工作。我们利用访谈和加拿大职业分类和词典中的信息,对短期工作进行了描述,并将其与持续时间≥2 年的工作进行了比较。
结果:短期工作平均占受试者工作年限的<4%。45%的受试者至少有一份短期工作;其中,49%的人有一份,24%的人有两份,27%的人至少有三份。所有短期工作中有一半是在 24 岁之前从事的。短期工作往往比长期工作更多地接触到烟雾、气味、灰尘和/或通风不良(17%对 13%)、户外工作(10%对 5%)和重体力活动(16%对 12%)。
结论:短期工作在职业生涯早期经常发生,并且比长期工作更频繁地涉及潜在的危险暴露。然而,由于它们仅占工作年限的一小部分,因此排除它们对终生暴露评估的影响应该很小。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019-7-24
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017-4-1
Environ Health. 2025-7-25
Environ Health. 2021-6-21
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019-7-24
Environ Health. 2016-10-21
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016-8
Occup Environ Med. 2012-10-2
Am J Epidemiol. 1999-2-15