Biggins Dean E, Eads David A
United States Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 28;6:75. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00075. eCollection 2019.
Plague (caused by the bacterium ) is a deadly flea-borne disease that remains a threat to public health nearly worldwide and is particularly disruptive ecologically where it has been introduced. We review hypotheses regarding maintenance and transmission of , emphasizing recent data from North America supporting maintenance by persistent transmission that results in sustained non-epizootic (but variable) rates of mortality in hosts. This maintenance mechanism may facilitate periodic epizootic eruptions "in place" because the need for repeated reinvasion from disjunct sources is eliminated. Resulting explosive outbreaks that spread rapidly in time and space are likely enhanced by synergistic positive feedback (PFB) cycles involving flea vectors, hosts, and the plague bacterium itself. Although PFB has been implied in plague literature for at least 50 years, we propose this mechanism, particularly with regard to flea responses, as central to epizootic plague rather than a phenomenon worthy of just peripheral mention. We also present new data on increases in flea:host ratios resulting from recreational shooting and poisoning as possible triggers for the transition from enzootic maintenance to PFB cycles and epizootic explosions. Although plague outbreaks have received much historic attention, PFB cycles that result in decimation of host populations lead to speculation that epizootic eruptions might not be part of the adaptive evolutionary strategy of but might instead be a tolerated intermittent cost of its . We also speculate that there may be mammal communities where epizootics, as we define them, are rare or absent. Absence of plague epizootics might translate into reduced public health risk but does not necessarily equate to inconsequential ecologic impact.
鼠疫(由细菌引起)是一种致命的跳蚤传播疾病,几乎在全球范围内仍然对公共卫生构成威胁,并且在其被引入的地区对生态具有特别大的破坏性。我们回顾了关于鼠疫维持和传播的假说,重点强调了来自北美的最新数据,这些数据支持通过持续传播来维持鼠疫,持续传播会导致宿主出现持续的非流行(但可变)死亡率。这种维持机制可能会促进“就地”周期性的流行爆发,因为消除了从分离源反复再次入侵的需求。涉及跳蚤媒介、宿主和鼠疫杆菌本身的协同正反馈(PFB)循环可能会增强时空上迅速传播的爆发。尽管PFB在鼠疫文献中至少已经被提及了50年,但我们提出这种机制,特别是关于跳蚤反应的机制,是流行鼠疫的核心,而不仅仅是一个值得顺带提及的现象。我们还展示了关于娱乐性射击和中毒导致跳蚤与宿主比例增加的新数据,这可能是从地方病维持向PFB循环和流行爆发转变的触发因素。尽管鼠疫爆发在历史上受到了很多关注,但导致宿主种群大量死亡的PFB循环引发了这样的猜测:流行爆发可能不是鼠疫适应性进化策略的一部分,而可能是其生存所容忍的间歇性代价。我们还推测,可能存在一些哺乳动物群落,在这些群落中,按照我们所定义的流行情况很少见或不存在。鼠疫流行的缺失可能意味着公共卫生风险降低,但不一定等同于生态影响微不足道。