Department of Psychology.
Jane and Terry Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 May;128(4):273-283. doi: 10.1037/abn0000416. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
The idea that psychopathology is associated with exceptional creativity has persisted despite a paucity of corroborating or disconfirming evidence. The authors measured psychopathology, including schizotypal personality traits, social responsiveness/autism spectrum traits, and lifetime incidence of mental disorders, along with lab-based tests of creativity in a unique sample of (exceptionally creative) individuals. The authors examined Big-C visual artists (VIS; = 35), Big-C scientists (SCI; = 41), and a smart comparison group (SCG; n = 31) matched on age, sex, race/ethnicity, parental education, and estimated IQ. Neither lifetime nor current prevalence of mental disorders was higher in Big-C groups relative to either the SCG or epidemiologic estimates, but individuals without a lifetime history of psychiatric disorder scored higher on a test of creative cognition relative to those who had at least one lifetime diagnosis. The groups differed in self-reported symptoms: VIS reported more schizotypal features than both SCI and SCG, and higher levels of socially divergent traits than SCI. Self-reported symptoms were below diagnostic thresholds in all 3 groups. The findings indicate that neither exceptional creativity nor performance on tests that putatively assess creativity are associated with mental illness but suggest that certain schizotypal features and socially divergent traits-at subclinical levels-are associated with Big-C achievement, at least in visual artists. The findings further raise questions about the sensitivity of laboratory tests for Big-C cognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管缺乏确凿的证据支持或否定,但是心理病理学与非凡创造力相关的观点仍然存在。作者在一个独特的样本中测量了心理病理学,包括精神分裂型人格特质、社会反应/自闭症谱系特质以及精神障碍的终身发病率,以及基于实验室的创造力测试。作者研究了非凡创造力的视觉艺术家(VIS;n = 35)、科学家(SCI;n = 41)和聪明的对照组(SCG;n = 31),这些组在年龄、性别、种族/民族、父母教育程度和估计智商方面相匹配。相对于 SCG 或流行病学估计,大 C 组的终身或当前精神障碍患病率均不高,但与至少有一个终身诊断的人相比,没有精神病史的人在创造性认知测试中得分更高。这 3 组在自我报告的症状上存在差异:VIS 报告的精神分裂症特征比 SCI 和 SCG 都多,并且比 SCI 报告的社交差异特征更多。所有 3 组的自我报告症状均低于诊断阈值。研究结果表明,非凡的创造力或据称评估创造力的测试表现都与精神疾病无关,但表明某些精神分裂症特征和社交差异特征(处于亚临床水平)与大 C 成就相关,至少在视觉艺术家方面是如此。这些发现进一步引发了关于大 C 认知的实验室测试敏感性的问题。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。