• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订版患者对整合护理感知调查的编制与心理计量学分析。

Development and Psychometric Analysis of the Revised Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care Survey.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/1077558719842951. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/1077558719842951
PMID:30985244
Abstract

This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care (PPIC 2.1) survey, which we administered to 12,364 Medicare beneficiaries who received treatment from 150 randomly selected physician organizations, receiving 3,067 responses (26%). Psychometric analyses, performed using two methods to adjust for respondent inherent optimism (as a measure of response tendency), supported a 6-factor, 22-item model with excellent fit. These factors were (1) Staff Knowledge about the Patient's Medical History, (2) Provider Support for the Patient's Self-Directed Care, (3) Test Result Communication, (4) Provider Knowledge of the Patient, (5) Provider Support for Medication Adherence and Home Health Management, and (6) Specialist Knowledge about the Patient's Medical History. Per Spearman-Brown prophesy calculations, reliability would exceed 0.7 for all factors at 33 or more responses per organization. The PPIC 2.1 survey can distinguish six dimensions of integrated patient care with high physician organization-level reliability at reasonable sample sizes.

摘要

本文描述了患者对综合护理认知(PPIC 2.1)调查的开发和心理计量学测试,我们向 150 个随机选择的医生组织中的 12364 名医疗保险受益人发放了该调查,收到了 3067 份回复(26%)。使用两种方法对回复者固有的乐观主义(作为反应倾向的衡量标准)进行了心理计量学分析,支持了具有良好拟合度的 6 因素 22 项模型。这些因素是:(1)员工对患者病史的了解,(2)提供者对患者自我护理的支持,(3)测试结果沟通,(4)提供者对患者的了解,(5)提供者对药物依从性和家庭健康管理的支持,以及(6)专家对患者病史的了解。根据斯皮尔曼-布朗预言计算,如果每个组织的回复数达到 33 个或更多,则所有因素的可靠性都将超过 0.7。PPIC 2.1 调查可以区分综合患者护理的六个维度,在合理的样本量下具有高医生组织水平的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Development and Psychometric Analysis of the Revised Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care Survey.修订版患者对整合护理感知调查的编制与心理计量学分析。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/1077558719842951. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
2
Medical Group Structural Integration May Not Ensure That Care Is Integrated, From The Patient's Perspective.从患者角度来看,医疗集团结构整合不一定能确保医疗服务的整合性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):885-892. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0909.
3
Cross-Cultural Validation of the Patient Perception of Integrated Care Survey.患者对整合照护感知量表的跨文化验证。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1745-1776. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12741. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Development and Testing of the Provider and Staff Perceptions of Integrated Care (PSPIC) Survey.提供方和员工对整合照护的认知调查(PSPIC)的编制与测试。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Dec;76(6):807-829. doi: 10.1177/1077558717745936. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Development of a survey instrument to measure patient experience of integrated care.开发一种用于测量患者综合护理体验的调查工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 1;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1437-z.
6
Development and preliminary validation of the Patient Perceptions of Integrated Care survey.患者对整合照护感知调查的编制与初步验证。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Apr;70(2):143-64. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465654. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
7
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
8
Validation of a Parent-Reported Experience Measure of Integrated Care.一项关于综合护理的家长报告体验测量方法的验证
Pediatrics. 2016 Dec;138(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0676.
9
Patients' Perceptions of Integrated Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries by Level of Need for Health Services.医疗保险受益人群中患者对综合医疗服务的需求程度认知
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):640-649. doi: 10.1177/10775587211067897. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
Measuring beneficiary knowledge of the Medicare program: a psychometric analysis.衡量医疗保险计划受益人的知识水平:一项心理测量分析。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Summer;24(4):111-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-centered evaluation of integrated care and health equity: evidence from county medical alliances in Henan province.以患者为中心的综合医疗与健康公平性评估:来自河南省县域医共体的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 12;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02468-5.
2
Geriatrics-Focused vs Traditional Primary Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中以老年医学为重点的初级保健与传统初级保健的对比
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454865. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54865.
3
Development and validation of the Chinese patient-centered integrated care scale.
中文版以患者为中心的综合照护量表的研制与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):1668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12156-9.
4
Organizational and patient factors associated with positive primary care experiences for veterans with current or recent homelessness.与当前或近期无家可归退伍军人积极的初级保健体验相关的组织因素和患者因素。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14359. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14359. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
5
Patient experiences and perspectives of health service access for carpal tunnel syndrome in Aotearoa New Zealand: a normalisation process theory-informed qualitative study.新西兰奥塔哥地区腕管综合征患者获取医疗服务的体验和看法:基于常态过程理论的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10871-x.
6
Understanding care coordination for Veterans with complex care needs: protocol of a multiple-methods study to build evidence for an effectiveness and implementation study.了解有复杂护理需求的退伍军人的护理协调:一项为有效性和实施研究建立证据的多方法研究方案
Front Health Serv. 2023 Aug 15;3:1211577. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1211577. eCollection 2023.
7
VA-Community Dual Care: Veteran and Clinician Perspectives.VA-社区双重护理:退伍军人和临床医生的观点。
J Community Health. 2020 Aug;45(4):795-802. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00795-y.
8
Can Organisational Culture of Teams Be a Lever for Integrating Care? An Exploratory Study.团队的组织文化能否成为整合医疗服务的杠杆?一项探索性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Dec 20;19(4):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4681.