• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACSM 参与前健康筛查指南:英国大学队列观点。

ACSM Preparticipation Health Screening Guidelines: A UK University Cohort Perspective.

机构信息

Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 May;51(5):1047-1054. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001868.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001868
PMID:30985585
Abstract

PURPOSE

Preparticipation health screening is recommended to detect individuals susceptible to serious adverse cardiovascular complications during exercise. Although expert opinion and best available scientific evidence have informed recent modifications, there remain limited experimental data to support or refute current practice. We therefore aimed to quantify the impact of change to the preparticipation health screening guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) on risk classification and referral for medical clearance in a large cohort of undergraduate university students.

METHODS

Participants attended the laboratory on a single occasion to undergo preparticipation health screening. Information concerning health status was obtained via self-report questionnaire and objective physiological assessment with all data recorded electronically and evaluated against the ACSM screening guidelines (9th and 10th editions).

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-three students completed the study. The 9th edition screening guidance resulted in 82 subjects (15%) classified as high risk, almost one-quarter (24%) classified as moderate risk, and almost two-thirds (61%) classified as low risk. In comparison, the updated 10th edition screening guidance resulted in a significant reduction in those previously classified as either high risk (5%) or moderate risk (2%), respectively. The majority of subjects (93%) were therefore cleared to begin a structured exercise program. Taken together, approximately one-third (32%) fewer medical referrals were required when applying the updated 10th edition guidance (χ4 = 247.7, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The updated ACSM 10th edition preparticipation screening guidance reduces medical referrals by approximately one-third. These findings are in keeping with previous reports and thus serve to consolidate and justify recent modification-particularly when applied to young adult or adolescent populations. The findings and arguments presented should be used to refine and inform future guidance.

摘要

目的

建议进行参赛前健康筛查,以发现易在运动中发生严重心血管并发症的个体。尽管专家意见和最佳现有科学证据为最近的修改提供了依据,但仍缺乏支持或反驳当前实践的有限实验数据。因此,我们旨在量化美国运动医学学院(ACSM)参赛前健康筛查指南的改变对大量大学生队列的风险分类和医疗许可转诊的影响。

方法

参与者在一次实验室就诊时接受参赛前健康筛查。通过自我报告问卷和客观生理评估获取健康状况信息,所有数据均以电子方式记录,并根据 ACSM 筛查指南(第 9 版和第 10 版)进行评估。

结果

553 名学生完成了研究。第 9 版筛查指南导致 82 名受试者(15%)被归类为高风险,近四分之一(24%)被归类为中风险,近三分之二(61%)被归类为低风险。相比之下,更新后的第 10 版筛查指南显著降低了之前被归类为高风险(5%)或中风险(2%)的人数。因此,大多数受试者(93%)被批准开始结构化运动计划。总的来说,当应用更新的第 10 版指南时,需要转诊的医学建议减少了约三分之一(χ4=247.7,P<0.001)。

结论

更新的 ACSM 第 10 版参赛前筛查指南使医学转诊减少了约三分之一。这些发现与之前的报告一致,因此支持并证明了最近的修改,特别是当应用于年轻成年人或青少年人群时。提出的发现和论点应被用于完善和指导未来的指南。

相似文献

1
ACSM Preparticipation Health Screening Guidelines: A UK University Cohort Perspective.ACSM 参与前健康筛查指南:英国大学队列观点。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 May;51(5):1047-1054. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001868.
2
Updating ACSM's Recommendations for Exercise Preparticipation Health Screening.更新美国运动医学会的运动前健康筛查建议。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Nov;47(11):2473-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000664.
3
Applying the ACSM Preparticipation Screening Algorithm to U.S. Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004.将美国运动医学学会(ACSM)运动前筛查算法应用于美国成年人:2001 - 2004年国家健康与营养检查调查
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Oct;49(10):2056-2063. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001331.
4
Comparison of cardiovascular screening guidelines for middle-aged/older adults.中老年人心血管筛查指南比较。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Sep;29(9):1375-1382. doi: 10.1111/sms.13457. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Preparticipation Physical Exams: The Rhode Island Perspective, A Call for Standardization.参与前体格检查:罗德岛的视角,呼吁标准化。
R I Med J (2013). 2016 Oct 4;99(10):18-22.
6
Profile of preparticipation cardiovascular screening for high school athletes.高中运动员赛前心血管筛查概况
JAMA. 1998 Jun 10;279(22):1817-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.22.1817.
7
AMSSM Position Statement on Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening in Athletes: Current Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, Recommendations and Future Directions.美国运动医学学会关于运动员心血管赛前筛查的立场声明:当前证据、知识空白、建议及未来方向
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2016 Sep-Oct;15(5):359-75. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000296.
8
ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition.美国运动医学学会《运动测试与处方指南》第九版中关于运动前健康筛查的新建议。
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf.
9
Preparticipation cardiovascular screening for US collegiate student-athletes.美国大学生运动员的赛前心血管筛查。
JAMA. 2000;283(12):1597-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1597.
10
AMSSM Position Statement on Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening in Athletes: Current evidence, knowledge gaps, recommendations and future directions.美国运动医学学会关于运动员心血管预参赛筛查的立场声明:现有证据、知识空白、建议和未来方向。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;51(3):153-167. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096781. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Singapore Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire 2021 (SPARQ 2021)-Results of Public Feedback.《2021年新加坡身体活动准备情况调查问卷》(SPARQ 2021)——公众反馈结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;13(15):1837. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151837.
2
Sports Preparticipation Evaluation for Healthy Adults: A Consensus-Based German Guideline.健康成年人运动参与前评估:基于共识的德国指南
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02230-5.
3
Exercise Recommendations and Practical Considerations for Asthma Management-An EAACI Position Paper.
哮喘管理的运动建议与实际考量——一份欧洲变态反应和临床免疫学会立场文件
Allergy. 2025 Jun;80(6):1572-1591. doi: 10.1111/all.16573. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
Biomarkers of aging: from molecules and surrogates to physiology and function.衰老的生物标志物:从分子与替代指标到生理学与功能
Physiol Rev. 2025 Jul 1;105(3):1609-1694. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2024. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of the KangaTech (KT360) Fixed Frame Dynamometry System During Maximal Isometric Strength Measurements of the Knee Flexors.在膝关节屈肌最大等长力量测量过程中,KangaTech(KT360)固定框架测力计系统的评分者内信度和评分者间信度。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Nov 2;19(11):1397-1406. doi: 10.26603/001c.124121. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of blood flow restriction training on health promotion in middle-aged and elderly women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流限制训练对中老年女性健康促进的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 2;15:1392483. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1392483. eCollection 2024.
7
The nature of inappropriate referrals to wellness services in primary care setting in Qatar: Outcome of multifaced interventions on rate and quality of referrals.卡塔尔初级保健机构中不适当转诊至健康服务的性质:多方面干预对转诊率和质量的影响结果。
Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(10):e31356. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31356. eCollection 2024 May 30.
8
Pre-Participation Screenings Frequently Miss Occult Cardiovascular Conditions in Apparently Healthy Male Middle-Aged First-Time Marathon Runners.赛前筛查常漏诊貌似健康的中年男性初次参加马拉松长跑者的隐匿性心血管病。
Cardiology. 2024;149(3):255-263. doi: 10.1159/000536553. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
9
High prevalence of exercise-induced stridor during Parkrun: a cross-sectional field-based evaluation.高强度有氧运动诱发喘鸣的高患病率:一项基于横断面的现场评估。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000618.
10
Typical aspects in the rehabilitation of cancer patients suffering from metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma.癌症骨转移或多发性骨髓瘤患者康复的典型方面。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 Nov;131(21-22):567-575. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-1524-3. Epub 2019 Jul 2.