Teo Tess Lin, Hong Ian Zhirui, Ho Lisa Cuiying, Ang Stefanie Hwee Chee, Venkataraman Anantharaman
Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;13(15):1837. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151837.
. Singapore had previously embraced at least two types of pre-participation questionnaires for those intending to take up or enhance their level of physical activity (PA). Concern over the usefulness of and difficulty in understanding these questions led to the design of a Singapore Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (SPARQ). The primary objective of this study was to review the level of difficulty in understanding the seven SPARQ questions. Secondary objectives included the rate of identifying individuals as unfit for PA and to seek public feedback on this tool. . A public, cross-sectional survey on the SPARQ was carried out, obtaining participants' bio-characteristics, having them completing the SPARQ and then providing feedback on the individual questions. . Of the 1136 who completed the survey, 35.7% would have required referral to a medical practitioner for further evaluation before the intended PA. Significant difficulty was experienced with one question, moderate difficulty with four and only slight difficulty with the remaining two. The length of the questions and use of technical terms were matters of concern. Suggestions were provided by the participants on possible amendments to the questions. . The very high acceptance rate of the SPARQ will need to be tempered with modifications to the questions to enhance ease of understanding and use by members of the public.
新加坡此前针对那些打算开始或提高其身体活动(PA)水平的人采用了至少两种类型的参与前问卷。由于担心这些问题的实用性以及理解上的困难,从而设计了新加坡身体活动准备情况问卷(SPARQ)。本研究的主要目的是评估理解SPARQ七个问题的难度水平。次要目的包括识别不适合进行身体活动的个体的比例,并征求公众对该工具的反馈。 开展了一项关于SPARQ的公开横断面调查,获取参与者的生物特征,让他们完成SPARQ,然后就各个问题提供反馈。 在完成调查的1136人中,35.7%的人在进行预期的身体活动之前需要转诊给医生进行进一步评估。有一个问题存在显著困难,四个问题有中等难度,其余两个问题只有轻微困难。问题的长度和专业术语的使用令人担忧。参与者就问题的可能修改提出了建议。 SPARQ非常高的接受率需要通过对问题进行修改来加以调整,以提高公众的理解和使用便利性。