Division of Digestive Diseases & Nutrition, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug;90(2):233-241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.1173. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
ERCP is considered the first-line therapy for biliary duct leaks (BDLs). However, the optimal ERCP timing and endotherapy methods remain controversial. Our aim was to evaluate these factors as predictors of poor clinical outcomes after BDLs.
Adults who underwent ERCP for BDLs after cholecystectomy were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2014. ERCP was classified as emergent, urgent, and expectant if it was done within 1 day, after 2 to 3 days, or >3 days after BDLs, respectively. Endotherapy was classified into sphincterotomy, stent, or combination. Post-ERCP adverse events (AEs) were defined as requiring pressor infusion, endotracheal intubation, invasive monitoring, or hemodialysis. Early endotherapy failure was defined as the need for salvage surgical or radiology-percutaneous biliary intervention after ERCP.
A total of 1028 patients with a median age of 56 years were included. ERCP was done emergently (19%), urgently (30%), and expectantly (51%). Endotherapy procedures were sphincterotomy (24%), biliary stent (24%), and combination (52%). Post-ERCP AEs were 11%, 10%, and 9% for emergent, urgent, and expectant ERCP, respectively (P = .577). In-hospital mortality showed a U-shape trend of 5%, 0%, and 2% for emergent, urgent, and expectant ERCP, respectively (P < .001). Combination and stent monotherapy had lower failure rates of 3% and 4%, respectively as compared with sphincterotomy monotherapy with failure rate of 11% (P < .001). When multivariate analysis was used, both combination (odds ratio, .2; 95% confidence interval, .1-.5) and stent monotherapy (odds ratio, .4; 95% confidence interval, .2-.9) were less likely to fail as compared with sphincterotomy monotherapy. There were no statistically significant differences between combination therapy and stent monotherapy in the univariate and the multivariate analyses.
Although limited by retrospective design and the possibility of selection bias, this analysis suggests that the timing of ERCP is not a significant predictor of post-ERCP AEs after BDLs. Furthermore, combination or stent monotherapy had lower failure rates as compared with sphincterotomy monotherapy.
ERCP 被认为是治疗胆管漏(BDL)的一线治疗方法。然而,ERCP 的最佳时机和内镜治疗方法仍存在争议。我们的目的是评估这些因素作为 BDL 后临床结局不良的预测因素。
从 2000 年至 2014 年,从全国住院患者样本中确定了因 BDL 而行 ERCP 的成年人。如果 ERCP 在 BDL 后 1 天内、2-3 天后或>3 天后进行,则分别将 ERCP 分类为紧急、紧急和期待。内镜治疗分为括约肌切开术、支架或联合治疗。ERCP 后不良事件(AE)定义为需要升压输液、气管插管、侵入性监测或血液透析。早期内镜治疗失败定义为 ERCP 后需要挽救性手术或放射介入胆道干预。
共纳入 1028 例中位年龄为 56 岁的患者。ERCP 紧急进行(19%)、紧急进行(30%)和期待进行(51%)。内镜治疗程序为括约肌切开术(24%)、胆道支架(24%)和联合治疗(52%)。ERCP 后 AE 的发生率分别为紧急、紧急和期待 ERCP 的 11%、10%和 9%(P=0.577)。住院死亡率呈 U 形趋势,分别为紧急、紧急和期待 ERCP 的 5%、0%和 2%(P<0.001)。联合和支架单独治疗的失败率分别为 3%和 4%,而括约肌切开术单独治疗的失败率为 11%(P<0.001)。多变量分析时,与括约肌切开术单独治疗相比,联合治疗(比值比,0.2;95%置信区间,0.1-0.5)和支架单独治疗(比值比,0.4;95%置信区间,0.2-0.9)不太可能失败。在单变量和多变量分析中,联合治疗和支架单独治疗之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
尽管受到回顾性设计和选择偏倚的可能性的限制,但该分析表明,ERCP 的时机并不是 BDL 后 ERCP 后 AE 的显著预测因素。此外,与括约肌切开术单独治疗相比,联合或支架单独治疗的失败率较低。