• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎儿脑部超声检查正常而进行宫内 MRI 研究时的脑部异常率及诊断性能指标的计算。

The rate of brain abnormalities on in utero MRI studies in fetuses with normal ultrasound examinations of the brain and calculation of indicators of diagnostic performance.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2019 Jul;74(7):527-533. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.010
PMID:30987757
Abstract

AIM

To estimate the rate of unexpected brain abnormalities detected by in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) in fetuses without abnormalities at ultrasonography (USS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study of pregnant women whose fetus had no structural brain (or body) abnormalities recognised on antenatal ultrasonography. Women were recruited from 12 centres across the UK and underwent iuMRI at 18 gestational weeks or more in the [blinded for review]. The imaging studies were reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist. The positive and negative predictive values of both USS and iuMRI have been calculated by combining the results of this study with the results from the main [blinded for review] study.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-eight pregnant women were recruited and underwent iuMRI of 205 fetuses. Brain abnormalities were shown on iuMRI in two fetuses that were not recognised on USS (one case of a focal cortical abnormality and one case of mild ventriculomegaly). The negative predictive value for USS was 99.5% and 100% for iuMRI.

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study comparing USS and iuMRI in low-risk pregnancies. USS has a comparatively high rule-out for fetal brain abnormalities and should remain the screening tool of choice.

摘要

目的

评估在超声检查(USS)未见异常的胎儿中,通过宫内磁共振成像(iuMRI)检测到意外脑异常的发生率。

材料与方法

这是一项对孕妇的前瞻性队列研究,其胎儿在产前超声检查中未发现有结构脑(或身体)异常。这些女性来自英国 12 个中心,在[审查中为盲法]进行了 18 孕周或以上的 iuMRI。由一位有经验的神经放射科医生对成像研究进行了评估。通过将这项研究的结果与主要[审查中为盲法]研究的结果相结合,计算了 USS 和 iuMRI 的阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

共招募了 198 名孕妇,并对 205 名胎儿进行了 iuMRI。在 2 名在 USS 上未识别出脑异常的胎儿中(1 例为局灶性皮质异常,1 例为轻度脑室扩大)显示出 iuMRI 脑异常。USS 的阴性预测值为 99.5%,iuMRI 的阴性预测值为 100%。

结论

据作者所知,这是第一项比较低风险妊娠中 USS 和 iuMRI 的研究。USS 对胎儿脑异常的排除率较高,应继续作为首选筛查工具。

相似文献

1
The rate of brain abnormalities on in utero MRI studies in fetuses with normal ultrasound examinations of the brain and calculation of indicators of diagnostic performance.胎儿脑部超声检查正常而进行宫内 MRI 研究时的脑部异常率及诊断性能指标的计算。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Jul;74(7):527-533. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study.磁共振成像在胎儿发育性脑异常诊断中的应用:MERIDIAN 诊断准确性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(49):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta23490.
3
Detecting Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound.磁共振成像与超声联合检测胎儿中枢神经系统异常
Med Arch. 2021 Feb;75(1):45-49. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.45-49.
4
Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.MRI 在宫内胎儿脑异常诊断中的应用(MERIDIAN):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):538-546. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
5
Fetal brain imaging: A comparison between fetal ultrasonography and intra uterine magnetic resonance imaging (a systematic review and meta-analysis).胎儿脑成像:胎儿超声与子宫内磁共振成像的比较(系统评价和荟萃分析)。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2022 May;50(4):491-499. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23158. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
6
Intrauterine fetal MR versus postmortem MR imaging after therapeutic termination of pregnancy: evaluation of the concordance in the detection of brain abnormalities at early gestational stage.宫内胎儿磁共振成像与治疗性终止妊娠后尸检磁共振成像的比较:在早期妊娠阶段检测脑异常的一致性评估。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun;29(6):2740-2750. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5878-0. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Post-mortem confirmation of fetal brain abnormalities: challenges highlighted by the MERIDIAN cohort study.胎儿脑异常的尸检确认:MERIDIAN队列研究凸显的挑战
BJOG. 2021 Jun;128(7):1174-1182. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16609. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort.宫内 MRI 检测胎儿脑异常及预测发育结局的准确性:MERIDIAN 队列的产后随访。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;4(2):131-140. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30349-9. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
9
Change in diagnostic confidence brought about by using in utero MRI for fetal structural brain pathology: analysis of the MERIDIAN cohort.使用子宫内磁共振成像(MRI)诊断胎儿脑部结构病变所带来的诊断信心变化:对MERIDIAN队列的分析
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jun;72(6):451-457. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定磁共振成像对产前胎儿脑异常诊断的贡献。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2367-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Diagnostic, Counseling, and Treatment Options in Non-Severe and Severe Apparently Isolated Fetal Ventriculomegaly.非重度和重度明显孤立性胎儿脑室扩大的当前诊断、咨询及治疗选择
Biomedicines. 2024 Dec 23;12(12):2929. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122929.
2
Isolated Fetal Ventriculomegaly: Diagnosis and Treatment in the Prenatal Period.孤立性胎儿脑室扩大:产前诊断与治疗
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;11(8):957. doi: 10.3390/children11080957.
3
Sex differences in fetal intracranial volumes assessed by in utero MR imaging.宫内磁共振成像评估胎儿颅内体积的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2023 Mar 15;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00497-9.
4
Normal appearances and dimensions of the foetal cavum septi pellucidi and vergae on in utero MR imaging.胎儿透明隔腔和Vergae 腔在宫内 MRI 中的正常外观和大小。
Neuroradiology. 2020 May;62(5):617-627. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02364-5.