• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Environmental and familial factors in drug use among commercial drivers in suburban public transport.城郊公共交通商业司机吸毒的环境和家庭因素
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):25-28. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_38_18.
2
Drug use and pattern of injuries sustained by drivers involved in road traffic crashes.道路交通事故中驾驶员的药物使用情况及受伤模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(3):195-200. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1889528. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Levels of lead in urban soils from selected cities in a central region of the Philippines.菲律宾中部地区部分城市城市土壤中的铅含量。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 May;13(3):177-83. doi: 10.1065/espr2005.08.275.
4
Work-related road traffic collisions in the UK.英国与工作相关的道路交通碰撞事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Mar;41(2):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.013. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
5
Farm tractors on Swedish public roads--age-related perspectives on police reported incidents and injuries.瑞典公共道路上的农用拖拉机——警方报告的事故和伤害的年龄相关视角
Work. 2014;49(1):39-49. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131767.
6
Comparison of the effects of two legal blood alcohol limits: the presence of alcohol in traffic accidents according to category of driver in Izmir, Turkey.两种法定血液酒精限量的效果比较:土耳其伊兹密尔交通事故中按驾驶员类别划分的酒精存在情况
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(5):440-2. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.968777. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Factors affecting substance use relapse among Iranian addicts.影响伊朗成瘾者药物使用复发的因素。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 May 20;10:129. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_984_20. eCollection 2021.
8
Annoyance evaluation and the effect of noise on the health of bus drivers.公交司机的烦恼评估及噪音对其健康的影响。
Noise Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;15(66):301-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.116561.
9
Toxicological investigations of drivers killed in road traffic accidents in Norway during 2006-2008.2006-2008 年期间在挪威死于道路交通碰撞事故的驾驶员的毒理学调查。
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Oct 10;212(1-3):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
10
Prevalence of Addiction and Smoking and Their Relationship With Blood Parameters Among Drivers in Zahedan.扎黑丹市驾驶员成瘾与吸烟的患病率及其与血液参数的关系
Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016 Jul 5;5(3):e27554. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.27554. eCollection 2016 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of environmental factors on traffic accidents in Iran.环境因素对伊朗交通事故的影响。
J Inj Violence Res. 2014 Jul;6(2):64-71. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v6i2.318. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
2
[Use of seat belts and mobile phone while driving in Florence: trend from 2005 to 2009].[佛罗伦萨驾车时安全带使用情况及驾驶时使用手机情况:2005年至2009年趋势]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Jan;36(1):34-40.
3
Road traffic injuries in Kenya: the health burden and risk factors in two districts.肯尼亚道路交通伤害:两个地区的健康负担和风险因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13 Suppl 1:24-30. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.633136.
4
Estimating person--environment transactions on intention to change drug-using behaviors.估计人与环境的相互作用对改变药物使用行为的意图。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2009 Jun;15(3):182-90. doi: 10.1177/1078390309337626.
5
The effect of cannabis compared with alcohol on driving.大麻与酒精对驾驶影响的比较。
Am J Addict. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):185-93. doi: 10.1080/10550490902786934.
6
Risk factors for urban road traffic injuries in Hangzhou, China.中国杭州城市道路交通伤害的风险因素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Apr;129(4):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0827-7. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
7
Guidelines for research on drugged driving.药物驾驶研究指南。
Addiction. 2008 Aug;103(8):1258-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02277.x.
8
Pedestrian road traffic injuries in urban Peruvian children and adolescents: case control analyses of personal and environmental risk factors.秘鲁城市儿童和青少年的行人道路交通伤害:个人和环境风险因素的病例对照分析
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 10;3(9):e3166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003166.
9
Aggressive crime, alcohol and drug use, and concentrated poverty in 24 U.S. urban areas.美国24个城市地区的暴力犯罪、酗酒和吸毒以及集中贫困问题。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(4):595-603. doi: 10.1080/00952990701407637.
10
Examining the relative importance of social context referents in predicting intention to change substance abuse behavior using the EASE.使用EASE研究社会环境参照在预测改变药物滥用行为意图方面的相对重要性。
Addict Behav. 2007 Sep;32(9):1826-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.12.015. Epub 2006 Dec 19.

城郊公共交通商业司机吸毒的环境和家庭因素

Environmental and familial factors in drug use among commercial drivers in suburban public transport.

作者信息

Ainy Elaheh, Soori Hamid

机构信息

Department of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):25-28. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_38_18.

DOI:10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_38_18
PMID:30989065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6423924/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A study was conducted in 2013 on the lack of accurate statistics on the environmental and family factors behind the use of drugs by drivers of public transport.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 1176 drivers of buses, mini-buses, vans, all kinds of trucks, and cars were randomly selected proportionately according to the type of vehicles. The capture-recapture sampling method was used to determine the prevalence rate of drug use among commercial drivers. Trained experts collected data regarding the environmental and family factors behind the use of addictive drugs. Urinalysis was performed by the Rapid Test method (ACON, San Diego, USA). To providing descriptive and analytical statistics the Kruskal-Wallis and Mantel-Haenszel methods, logistic regression, and Chi-square tests were used.

RESULTS

The mean age of the drivers was 39.9 ± 9.7 years. The results of the experiment were positive in 14.1% of the drivers. A significant difference observed between addicted and nonaddicted drivers related to cold and heat ( < 0.001) and lack of facilities ( = 0.006) as the most influencing factors. The most important environmental factor was family poverty ( < 0.001), followed by marital status and its problems ( = 0.002), a large number of children ( = 0.006), and family disputes ( = 0.012). A family history of addiction was 2.5 times more among addicted drivers.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of addiction was 14.1%. Among the environmental factors, cold and heat, lack of facilities, family factors, and a family history of addiction greatly influenced addiction.

摘要

背景

2013年开展了一项关于公共交通司机吸毒背后环境和家庭因素缺乏准确统计数据的研究。

材料与方法

总体而言,根据车辆类型按比例随机抽取了1176名公交车、小型巴士、货车、各类卡车和汽车的司机。采用捕获-再捕获抽样方法来确定商业司机中的吸毒患病率。训练有素的专家收集了关于成瘾药物使用背后的环境和家庭因素的数据。采用快速检测法(美国圣地亚哥的ACON公司)进行尿液分析。为提供描述性和分析性统计数据,使用了Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mantel-Haenszel检验、逻辑回归和卡方检验。

结果

司机的平均年龄为39.9±9.7岁。14.1%的司机实验结果呈阳性。在成瘾和未成瘾司机之间观察到与寒冷和炎热(<0.001)以及缺乏设施(=0.006)等最具影响因素存在显著差异。最重要的环境因素是家庭贫困(<0.001),其次是婚姻状况及其问题(=0.002)、子女众多(=0.006)和家庭纠纷(=0.012)。成瘾司机中有成瘾家族史的比例是未成瘾司机的2.5倍。

结论

成瘾患病率为14.1%。在环境因素中,寒冷和炎热、缺乏设施、家庭因素以及成瘾家族史对成瘾有很大影响。