Samaranayake L P, MacFarlane T W, Lamey P J, Ferguson M M
J Oral Pathol. 1986 Aug;15(7):386-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1986.tb00646.x.
The sensitivity of the impression culture, the neat rinse culture (NRC) and the concentrated rinse culture (CRC) methods in detecting the oral carriage of yeasts, coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus was estimated in 75 individuals. The recovery of organisms from the imprint cultures of the tongue and the CRC was similar and there was highly significant positive correlation between the two techniques. The CRC was simple to perform, equally sensitive and superior in quantifying yeast, coliform and S. aureus carriage than the imprint culture technique. Hence, it is suggested that the CRC technique be preferentially employed in future investigations to obtain comparable data from different centres.
在75名个体中评估了印模培养、纯洗培养(NRC)和浓洗培养(CRC)方法检测酵母菌、大肠菌群和金黄色葡萄球菌口腔携带情况的敏感性。从舌印模培养物和CRC中回收的微生物相似,并且这两种技术之间存在高度显著的正相关。CRC操作简单,在定量酵母菌、大肠菌群和金黄色葡萄球菌携带情况方面与印模培养技术同样敏感且更具优势。因此,建议在未来的研究中优先采用CRC技术,以便从不同中心获得可比数据。