Suppr超能文献

口腔冲洗和印记取样技术在检测口腔中酵母菌、大肠菌群和金黄色葡萄球菌携带情况方面的比较。

A comparison of oral rinse and imprint sampling techniques for the detection of yeast, coliform and Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the oral cavity.

作者信息

Samaranayake L P, MacFarlane T W, Lamey P J, Ferguson M M

出版信息

J Oral Pathol. 1986 Aug;15(7):386-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1986.tb00646.x.

Abstract

The sensitivity of the impression culture, the neat rinse culture (NRC) and the concentrated rinse culture (CRC) methods in detecting the oral carriage of yeasts, coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus was estimated in 75 individuals. The recovery of organisms from the imprint cultures of the tongue and the CRC was similar and there was highly significant positive correlation between the two techniques. The CRC was simple to perform, equally sensitive and superior in quantifying yeast, coliform and S. aureus carriage than the imprint culture technique. Hence, it is suggested that the CRC technique be preferentially employed in future investigations to obtain comparable data from different centres.

摘要

在75名个体中评估了印模培养、纯洗培养(NRC)和浓洗培养(CRC)方法检测酵母菌、大肠菌群和金黄色葡萄球菌口腔携带情况的敏感性。从舌印模培养物和CRC中回收的微生物相似,并且这两种技术之间存在高度显著的正相关。CRC操作简单,在定量酵母菌、大肠菌群和金黄色葡萄球菌携带情况方面与印模培养技术同样敏感且更具优势。因此,建议在未来的研究中优先采用CRC技术,以便从不同中心获得可比数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验