• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A randomized trial of the effectiveness of an ultrasonic denture hygiene intervention program among community dwelling elders.一项针对社区居住老年人的超声波义齿卫生干预项目有效性的随机试验。
Eur Oral Res. 2023 May 4;57(2):83-89. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231025114.
2
Efficacy of ultrasonic home-care denture cleaning versus conventional denture cleaning: A randomised crossover clinical trial.超声家庭护理义齿清洁与传统义齿清洁的疗效比较:一项随机交叉临床试验。
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105215. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105215. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Impact of Denture Cleaning Method and Overnight Storage Condition on Denture Biofilm Mass and Composition: A Cross-Over Randomized Clinical Trial.义齿清洁方法和过夜储存条件对义齿生物膜质量和组成的影响:一项交叉随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0145837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145837. eCollection 2016.
4
Effectiveness of a combination denture-cleaning method versus a mechanical method: comparison of denture cleanliness, patient satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life.组合义齿清洁方法与机械方法的效果比较:义齿清洁度、患者满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量的比较。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jul;62(3):353-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Effect of water temperature during ultrasonic denture cleaning.超声波义齿清洁过程中水温的影响。
J Oral Sci. 2019;61(1):140-145. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0387.
6
Efficacy of removing Candida albicans from orthodontic acrylic bases: an in vitro study.正畸丙烯酸基托中白色念珠菌清除效果的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 2;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0765-x.
7
The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures.化学义齿清洁剂和超声装置去除全口义齿生物膜的效果。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):668-73. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600021.
8
Effectiveness of professional oral health care intervention on the oral health of residents with dementia in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review protocol.专业口腔保健干预对老年护理机构中痴呆症居民口腔健康的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):110-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2330.
9
Oral candidosis, denture cleanliness and hygiene habits in an elderly population.老年人口中的口腔念珠菌病、假牙清洁与卫生习惯
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Dec;17(6):502-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03327418.
10
Survival of microorganisms on complete dentures following ultrasonic cleaning combined with immersion in peroxide-based cleanser solution.全口义齿在超声清洗并浸泡于过氧化物基清洁液后微生物的存活情况。
Gerodontology. 2014 Sep;31(3):202-9. doi: 10.1111/ger.12027. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Correlation Between Prosthodontic Interventions and Chest Infections: A Comprehensive Research Analysis.评估口腔修复干预与胸部感染之间的相关性:一项综合研究分析。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66208. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Characterization of pathogenic microbiome on removable prostheses with different levels of cleanliness using 2bRAD-M metagenomic sequencing.使用2bRAD-M宏基因组测序对不同清洁程度的可摘义齿上的致病微生物群进行表征。
J Oral Microbiol. 2024 Feb 22;16(1):2317059. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2024.2317059. eCollection 2024.
3
Different Polymers for the Base of Removable Dentures? Part II: A Narrative Review of the Dynamics of Microbial Plaque Formation on Dentures.可摘义齿基托的不同聚合物?第二部分:义齿微生物菌斑形成动力学的叙述性综述
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Dec 21;16(1):40. doi: 10.3390/polym16010040.

本文引用的文献

1
Hygiene practices in removable prosthodontics: A systematic review.可摘局部义齿修复中的卫生习惯:一项系统评价。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 May;16(2):179-201. doi: 10.1111/idh.12323. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
2
Midline Fractures in Single Maxillary Complete Acrylic vs Flexible Dentures.单颌全口丙烯酸树脂假牙与柔性假牙的中线骨折
Med J Armed Forces India. 2009 Apr;65(2):141-5. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80128-7. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
3
Impact of Denture Cleaning Method and Overnight Storage Condition on Denture Biofilm Mass and Composition: A Cross-Over Randomized Clinical Trial.义齿清洁方法和过夜储存条件对义齿生物膜质量和组成的影响:一项交叉随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0145837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145837. eCollection 2016.
4
A clinical audit of denture cleanliness in general dental practice undertaken in the West Midlands.对西米德兰兹郡普通牙科诊所假牙清洁情况进行的临床审计。
Br Dent J. 2014 Sep;217(5):231-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.757.
5
Survival of microorganisms on complete dentures following ultrasonic cleaning combined with immersion in peroxide-based cleanser solution.全口义齿在超声清洗并浸泡于过氧化物基清洁液后微生物的存活情况。
Gerodontology. 2014 Sep;31(3):202-9. doi: 10.1111/ger.12027. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
6
Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study.比较机构化老年人中使用的氟胺和洗必泰:一项初步研究。
Gerodontology. 2013 Jun;30(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00650.x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
7
The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures.化学义齿清洁剂和超声装置去除全口义齿生物膜的效果。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):668-73. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600021.
8
Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture.不同清洁剂对可摘局部义齿表面的影响。
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(5):392-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000500008.
9
Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists.循证指南:全口义齿的护理与维护,美国修复牙科学会发布。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Feb;20 Suppl 1:S1-S12. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00683.x.
10
Effervescent tablets and ultrasonic devices against Candida and mutans streptococci in denture biofilm.泡腾片和超声装置对抗义齿生物膜中的白色念珠菌和变异链球菌。
Gerodontology. 2011 Dec;28(4):264-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00378.x. Epub 2010 May 26.

一项针对社区居住老年人的超声波义齿卫生干预项目有效性的随机试验。

A randomized trial of the effectiveness of an ultrasonic denture hygiene intervention program among community dwelling elders.

作者信息

Chan Ronald, Zhang Jiaguan, McGrath Colman, Tsang Paul, Lam Otto

机构信息

Prosthodontics, The University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong SAR,China.

The Eighth Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen UniversityChina.

出版信息

Eur Oral Res. 2023 May 4;57(2):83-89. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231025114.

DOI:10.26650/eor.20231025114
PMID:37525857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387143/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonic denture hygiene interventions in improving denture cleanliness among elderly individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six participants who had received upper metal framework removable partial dentures within the past 5 years were randomly allocated into three denture hygiene intervention groups: group 1 (mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush and ultrasonic cleaning with cetylpyridinium chloride), group 2 (mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush and ultrasonic cleaning with distilled water), and control (mechanical cleaning with a toothbrush only). Denture cleanliness was assessed at baseline and 1-month using: i) Denture Cleanliness Index (DCI) scores; ii) plaque coverage percentage; and (iii) microbiological samples for bacterial and yeast detection. Differences between groups were assessed with one-way analysis of variance and Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

Mean DCI scores and mean percentages of plaque coverage area were significantly reduced in group 1 and group 2, compared to the control group for both cobalt chromium (CoCr) and acrylic fitting surfaces (p<0.001). No significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2 with regard to the prevalence and viable counts of yeasts or total microbial viable counts. No significant differences in the investigated clinical and microbiological parameters were observed between CoCr and acrylic surfaces following the intervention period.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasonic cleaner was significantly more effective than mechanical cleaning in the reduction of biofilm coverage on metal framework removable partial dentures over a 1-month intervention period. Nevertheless, the adjunctive use of cetylpyridinium chloride with ultrasonic cleaning did not yield additional benefits.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估超声义齿清洁干预措施对改善老年人义齿清洁度的效果。

材料与方法

66名在过去5年内接受过上颌金属支架可摘局部义齿修复的参与者被随机分为三组义齿清洁干预组:第1组(用牙刷进行机械清洁并用氯化十六烷基吡啶进行超声清洁),第2组(用牙刷进行机械清洁并用蒸馏水进行超声清洁),以及对照组(仅用牙刷进行机械清洁)。在基线和1个月时通过以下方式评估义齿清洁度:i)义齿清洁指数(DCI)评分;ii)菌斑覆盖百分比;以及(iii)用于细菌和酵母菌检测的微生物样本。采用单因素方差分析和卡方检验评估组间差异。

结果

对于钴铬(CoCr)和丙烯酸树脂贴合面,与对照组相比,第1组和第2组的平均DCI评分和菌斑覆盖面积的平均百分比均显著降低(p<0.001)。在酵母菌的患病率和活菌计数或总微生物活菌计数方面,第1组和第2组之间未发现显著差异。在干预期后,CoCr表面和丙烯酸树脂表面在研究的临床和微生物学参数方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

在为期1个月的干预期内,超声清洁器在减少金属支架可摘局部义齿上的生物膜覆盖方面明显比机械清洁更有效。然而,氯化十六烷基吡啶与超声清洁联合使用并未产生额外益处。