Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Dr., Memphis, TN 38152, United States.
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Jun;70:79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
A robust body of theoretical and experimental work highlights the influence of alternative, substance-free rewards on decisions to use alcohol and other drugs. However, translational applications have been limited in part by the lack of consensus on how to measure substance-free reinforcement in applied and clinical settings. The current study summarizes extant research utilizing self-report reinforcement or reward methodologies, and critically reviews the psychometric properties of the available measures. These studies (N = 50) fell into three categories: measures of recent substance-related and substance-free activity participation and enjoyment (n = 32), measures of time or monetary resource allocation (n = 15), and rating scale measures of reward availability and experience (n = 8). The available research suggests that, consistent with experimental laboratory research and with behavioral economic predictions, there is an inverse relation between substance-free reinforcement and substance use. These studies also support the clinical utility of these measures in predicting substance use severity and course. Reinforcement measures could be improved by enhancing content validity, multimethod convergent validity, and generalizability.
大量的理论和实验工作强调了替代物质奖励对使用酒精和其他药物的决策的影响。然而,由于缺乏关于如何在应用和临床环境中衡量无物质强化的共识,转化应用受到了限制。本研究总结了利用自我报告强化或奖励方法的现有研究,并批判性地审查了现有测量方法的心理计量学特性。这些研究(N=50)分为三类:最近与物质相关和无物质活动参与和享受的测量(n=32)、时间或金钱资源分配的测量(n=15)以及奖励可用性和体验的评分量表测量(n=8)。现有研究表明,与实验实验室研究和行为经济学预测一致,无物质强化与物质使用之间存在反比关系。这些研究还支持这些措施在预测物质使用严重程度和过程中的临床效用。通过提高内容效度、多方法会聚效度和普遍性,可以改进强化措施。