Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Division, 1825 Eastchester Road, DOM 2-76, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):692-698. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04891-1.
For at least the past two decades, medical educators have worked to improve patient communication and health care delivery to diverse patient populations; despite efforts, patients continue to report prejudice and bias during their clinical encounters. Targeted instruction in implicit bias recognition and management may promote the delivery of equitable care, but students at times resist this instruction. Little guidance exists to overcome this resistance and to engage students in implicit bias instruction; instruction over time could lead to eventual skill development that is necessary to mitigate the influence of implicit bias on clinical practice behaviors.
To explore student perceptions of challenges and opportunities when participating in implicit bias instruction.
We conducted a qualitative study that involved 11 focus groups with medical students across each of the four class years to explore their perceptions of challenges and opportunities related to participating in such instruction. We analyzed transcripts for themes.
Our analysis suggests a range of attitudes toward implicit bias instruction and identifies contextual factors that may influence these attitudes. The themes were (1) resistance; (2) shame; (3) the negative role of the hidden curriculum; and (4) structural barriers to student engagement. Students expressed resistance to implicit bias instruction; some of these attitudes are fueled from concerns of anticipated shame within the learning environment. Participants also indicated that student engagement in implicit bias instruction was influenced by the hidden curriculum and structural barriers.
These insights can inform future curriculum development efforts. Considerations related to instructional design and programmatic decision-making are highlighted. These considerations for implicit bias instruction may provide useful frameworks for educators looking for opportunities to minimize student resistance and maximize engagement in multi-session instruction in implicit bias recognition and management.
至少在过去二十年中,医学教育工作者一直致力于改善对不同患者群体的医患沟通和医疗服务;尽管付出了努力,但患者在就诊时仍报告存在偏见和歧视。针对性地指导学生识别和管理隐性偏见可能有助于提供公平的护理,但学生有时会抵制这种指导。几乎没有指导可以克服这种抵制并让学生参与隐性偏见教学;随着时间的推移进行教学可能会最终培养出必要的技能,以减轻隐性偏见对临床实践行为的影响。
探讨学生在参与隐性偏见教学时对挑战和机遇的看法。
我们进行了一项定性研究,涉及四个年级的 11 个焦点小组,以探讨他们对参与此类教学的挑战和机遇的看法。我们对转录本进行了主题分析。
我们的分析表明,学生对隐性偏见教学的态度存在差异,并确定了可能影响这些态度的背景因素。这些主题包括(1)抵制;(2)羞耻感;(3)隐性课程的负面影响;(4)学生参与的结构性障碍。学生对隐性偏见教学表示抵制;其中一些态度源于对学习环境中预期羞耻感的担忧。参与者还表示,学生对隐性偏见教学的参与受到隐性课程和结构性障碍的影响。
这些见解可以为未来的课程开发工作提供信息。强调了与教学设计和计划决策相关的考虑因素。这些关于隐性偏见教学的考虑因素可能为教育工作者提供有用的框架,帮助他们减少学生的抵制,最大限度地提高对隐性偏见识别和管理的多轮教学的参与度。