Lennon Olive, Phelan Deirdre, Wallace Deborah, King Justin, Barrett Terry
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Physiother Res Int. 2019 Jul;24(3):e1774. doi: 10.1002/pri.1774. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Evidence-based practice (EBP), which integrates clinical reasoning skills, research evidence, and patient preference, has become standard in curricula for health care professional programs. Students however perceive EBP as difficult and often irrelevant to clinical practice.
A problem-based learning (PBL) approach is trialled in an early stage module where EBP knowledge and skills are stated learning outcomes. Prior to this, the content-based approach to EBP teaching and learning received negative student feedback. The impact of delivering EBP through PBL is evaluated by comparing 5 standard Likert feedback scales and open-ended question responses relating to the EBP instruction in the module before and after a PBL approach was implemented. The impact of a PBL approach on EBP profiles is further examined under domains (relevance, sympathy, terminology, practice, and confidence) of the validated Evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire.
All mean Likert scores relating to subject understanding, relevance of assessments, achievement of learning outcomes, teaching, and overall module satisfaction improved when the PBL approach was compared with the lecture-based format (p < 0.05). Student comment post-PBL continued to identify EBP as a difficult concept, but now comments on the teaching and assessment approach were mainly positive, addressing the collaborative nature of PBL, identifying EBP, communication and team-working skills acquired, praising the real life, practical application of EBP taken, and commenting on improvement in EBP self-efficacy. Within group change in the Evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire following a PBL approach identified significant improvement in EBP domains of terminology (mean change 3.38; p < 0.001); practice (mean change 16.5; p < 0.001), and confidence (mean change 10.1; p = 0.008). Conceptual links, based on constructivist underpinnings of PBL and EBP, are developed in the paper.
Using mixed methods evaluation, PBL is effective at promoting early EBP. Students identified with the interactive, collaborative, and experiential nature of PBL to EBP instruction.
循证实践(EBP)将临床推理技能、研究证据和患者偏好整合在一起,已成为医疗保健专业课程的标准。然而,学生们认为循证实践很难,而且往往与临床实践无关。
在一个早期模块中试用基于问题的学习(PBL)方法,该模块将循证实践知识和技能作为既定的学习成果。在此之前,基于内容的循证实践教学方法收到了学生的负面反馈。通过比较5个标准的李克特反馈量表以及与该模块中循证实践教学相关的开放式问题回答,来评估通过基于问题的学习(PBL)进行循证实践教学的效果,评估在实施基于问题的学习(PBL)方法前后进行。在经过验证的循证实践概况问卷的各个领域(相关性、共鸣、术语、实践和信心)下,进一步研究基于问题的学习(PBL)方法对循证实践概况的影响。
与基于讲座的形式相比,采用基于问题的学习(PBL)方法时,所有与学科理解、评估相关性、学习成果达成、教学以及整体模块满意度相关的平均李克特分数均有所提高(p < 0.05)。基于问题的学习(PBL)之后的学生评论继续将循证实践视为一个困难的概念,但现在对教学和评估方法的评论主要是积极的,涉及基于问题的学习(PBL)的协作性质、对循证实践的识别、获得的沟通和团队合作技能、对循证实践在现实生活中的实际应用的赞扬,以及对循证实践自我效能感提高的评论。基于问题的学习(PBL)方法之后,循证实践概况问卷中的组内变化表明,在术语(平均变化3.38;p < 0.001)、实践(平均变化16.5;p < 0.001)和信心(平均变化10.1;p = 0.008)等循证实践领域有显著改善。本文基于基于问题的学习(PBL)和循证实践的建构主义基础,建立了概念联系。
通过混合方法评估,基于问题的学习(PBL)在促进早期循证实践方面是有效的。学生认同基于问题的学习(PBL)在循证实践教学中的互动性、协作性和体验性。