• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Fragility Index-P Values Reimagined, Flaws and All.

作者信息

Acuna Sergio A, Sue-Chue-Lam Colin, Dossa Fahima

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):674. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0567.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0567
PMID:30994897
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The Fragility Index-P Values Reimagined, Flaws and All.重新审视的脆弱性指数-P值，包括所有缺陷。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):674. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0567.
2
The Fragility Index-P Values Reimagined, Flaws and All-Reply.重新构想的脆弱性指数-P值，包括所有缺陷及回应
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):674-675. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0568.
3
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Spin in Randomized Controlled Trials.随机对照试验中自旋的横断面分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Mar;33(3):247-248. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4252-2.
4
Walking on thin ice: considering the fragility index in randomized control trials.如履薄冰：在随机对照试验中考虑脆弱性指数
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;32(2):139. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001632.
5
Reporting statistics in abstracts in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ®.《临床骨科与相关研究》® 中摘要里的统计数据报告。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1739-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2984-9. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
6
CONSORT recommendations in abstracts of randomised, controlled trials on migraine and headache.CONSORT 建议在偏头痛和头痛的随机对照试验摘要中使用。
J Headache Pain. 2011 Oct;12(5):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s10194-011-0361-1. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
7
Comments on "Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals".关于“七大学报中麻醉学期刊随机对照试验摘要报告质量的评论”。
Trials. 2019 Nov 19;20(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3857-7.
8
Pharmacy journal abstracts published in PubMed that abide by the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.发表于PubMed且遵循《试验报告统一标准》（CONSORT）指南的药学杂志摘要。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):110-4. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.010.
9
CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE are the most comprehensive databases indexing randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions.CENTRAL、PEDro、PubMed 和 EMBASE 是索引物理治疗干预措施的随机对照试验的最全面数据库。
Phys Ther. 2011 Feb;91(2):190-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100116. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
10
Medical journalism throughout the world.世界各地的医学新闻业。
Med J Aust. 1961 May 20;48(1):721-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1961.tb69106.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fragility of Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials in the Plastic Surgery Literature.整形外科学术文献中标志性随机对照试验的脆弱性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):e5352. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005352. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Robustness of Longitudinal Safety and Efficacy After Paclitaxel-Based Endovascular Therapy for Treatment of Femoro-Popliteal Artery Occlusive Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于紫杉醇的腔内治疗治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的纵向安全性和疗效的稳健性：随机对照试验的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:164-178. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.
评估 COVID-19 疫苗疗效试验的稳健性：系统评价和荟萃分析，2023 年 1 月。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Jun;28(22). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.22.2200706.
4
Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library.基于 Cochrane 图书馆中大量临床研究数据库的脆性指数的实证评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;29(2):359-370. doi: 10.1111/jep.13787. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.评估临床试验和荟萃分析结果的稳健性：脆弱指数方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package.使用 fragility 包在 R 中评估和可视化二项结果临床结果的脆弱性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268754. eCollection 2022.
7
Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results.儿科外科试验、脆弱指数及其为何应避免用于评估结果
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jul;38(7):1057-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05133-y. Epub 2022 May 7.
8
How fragile are Mediterranean diet interventions? A research-on-research study of randomised controlled trials.地中海饮食干预措施有多脆弱？一项对随机对照试验的研究之研究。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021 Mar 9;4(1):115-131. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000188. eCollection 2021.
9
Meta-analyses in paediatric surgery are often fragile: implications and consequences.儿科外科学中的荟萃分析往往很脆弱：影响和后果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Mar;37(3):363-367. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04827-5. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
10
The weakness of fragility index exposed in an analysis of the traumatic brain injury management guidelines: A meta-epidemiological and simulation study.脆弱指数的弱点在创伤性脑损伤管理指南分析中暴露无遗：一项荟萃流行病学和模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0237879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237879. eCollection 2020.