• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察澳大利亚酗酒人群。

Examining Australia's heaviest drinkers.

机构信息

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Victoria.

Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Oct;43(5):451-456. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12901. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.12901
PMID:30994968
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the distribution of alcohol consumption in Australia, identifying the heaviest drinking 10% of the population and examining their sociodemographic characteristics and their alcohol consumption and purchasing practices.

METHODS

Data came from the 2016 National Drug Strategy Household Survey and the 2013 International Alcohol Control Study. The heaviest drinking 10% of the population identified based on estimates of annual alcohol consumption. Logistic regression was then used to assess the factors that distinguished these heaviest drinkers from the rest of the drinking population.

RESULTS

The heaviest drinking 10% of the population consumed 54.4% of all alcohol consumed. These heavy drinkers were more likely to be men and to live in regional and remote areas. They were more likely to drink cask wine and full-strength beer and to purchase cheaper alcohol than other drinkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Australian alcohol consumption is heavily skewed. Alcohol consumption practices appear to differentiate the heaviest drinkers from others more clearly than sociodemographic factors. Implications for public health: Public health interventions that reduce drinking among the heaviest 10% of drinkers in Australia have the potential to markedly reduce per-capita consumption and reduce alcohol-related harm. Interventions focused on cheap alcohol may be effective with these drinkers.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了澳大利亚的饮酒分布情况,确定了饮酒量最高的 10%人群,并分析了他们的社会人口学特征以及饮酒和购买习惯。

方法

数据来自 2016 年全国毒品策略家庭调查和 2013 年国际酒精控制研究。根据年饮酒量估计,确定饮酒量最高的 10%人群。然后使用逻辑回归评估将这些重度饮酒者与其他饮酒者区分开来的因素。

结果

饮酒量最高的 10%人群消费了所有酒类的 54.4%。这些重度饮酒者更可能是男性,居住在地区和偏远地区。他们更可能饮用桶装葡萄酒和全强度啤酒,并购买比其他饮酒者更便宜的酒精。

结论

澳大利亚的饮酒量严重偏向。饮酒习惯似乎比社会人口学因素更能清楚地区分重度饮酒者和其他人。对公共卫生的影响:减少澳大利亚饮酒量最高的 10%人群饮酒的公共卫生干预措施有可能显著降低人均消费量并减少与酒精相关的危害。针对廉价酒精的干预措施可能对这些饮酒者有效。

相似文献

1
Examining Australia's heaviest drinkers.考察澳大利亚酗酒人群。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Oct;43(5):451-456. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12901. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
What do binge drinkers drink? Implications for alcohol control policy.酗酒者喝什么?对酒精控制政策的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Sep;33(3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.026.
3
Alcohol purchasing by ill heavy drinkers; cheap alcohol is no single commodity.酗酒者购买酒精饮料;廉价酒精并非单一商品。
Public Health. 2015 Dec;129(12):1571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
4
Cask wine: Describing drinking patterns associated with Australia's cheapest alcohol.桶装葡萄酒:描述与澳大利亚最便宜酒精饮品相关的饮酒模式。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Sep;42(6):1322-1331. doi: 10.1111/dar.13684. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Purchases by heavier drinking young people concentrated in lower priced beverages: Implications for policy.饮酒量较大的年轻人购买的饮料集中在低价饮品:对政策的启示。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 May;36(3):352-358. doi: 10.1111/dar.12495. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
Price elasticity of on- and off-premises demand for alcoholic drinks: A Tobit analysis.酒精饮料店内和店外需求的价格弹性:一项托比特分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
Drinking and driving: explaining beverage-specific risks.酒后驾车:解读特定饮料的风险。
J Stud Alcohol. 2000 Jul;61(4):515-23. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.515.
8
Who drinks most of the alcohol in the US? The policy implications.在美国,谁喝掉了大部分的酒?政策启示。
J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Jan;60(1):78-89. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.78.
9
Predictors of awareness of standard drink labelling and drinking guidelines to reduce negative health effects among Australian drinkers.澳大利亚饮酒者中对标准饮酒标签及饮酒指南的认知预测因素,以减少负面健康影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Mar;36(2):200-209. doi: 10.1111/dar.12383. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
White cider consumption and heavy drinkers: a low-cost option but an unknown price.饮用白苹果酒与酗酒者:一种低成本选择但代价未知。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Nov;49(6):675-80. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu068. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Harms to children from men's heavy drinking: A scoping review.男性酗酒对儿童的危害:一项范围综述。
Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2024 Dec 12;12(2):85-100. doi: 10.7895/ijadr.523.
2
Alcoholic beverage types consumed by population subgroups in the United States: Implications for alcohol policy to address health disparities.美国人群亚组消费的酒精饮料类型:解决健康差异的酒精政策的启示。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 May;43(4):946-955. doi: 10.1111/dar.13819. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
'A recipe for cultural disaster!'- a case study of Woolworths Group's proposal to build an alcohol megastore in Darwin, Northern Territory.
“文化灾难的处方!”- 以伍尔沃思集团(Woolworths Group)在北领地达尔文市(Darwin, Northern Territory)提议建造一个酒类专卖店为例。
Global Health. 2023 Jun 10;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00938-5.
4
Analysis of illicit stimulant use triangulating wastewater, general population survey and web survey data.利用污水、普通人群调查和网络调查数据对非法兴奋剂使用情况进行三角测量分析。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Apr;40(2):160-175. doi: 10.1177/14550725221122150. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
Assessing the health impacts of transnational corporations: a case study of Carlton and United Breweries in Australia.评估跨国公司对健康的影响:以澳大利亚卡登和联合啤酒厂为例。
Global Health. 2022 Sep 9;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00870-0.
6
How does social class shape women's alcohol stockpiling during COVID-19?: A qualitative study in South Australia during the 2020 lockdown.社会阶层如何影响新冠疫情期间女性的酒精囤积行为?:2020年封锁期间在南澳大利亚进行的一项定性研究
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100080. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Revisiting Candidacy: What Might It Offer Cancer Prevention?重新审视癌症候选人:它能为癌症预防带来什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;18(19):10157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910157.