• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the health impacts of transnational corporations: a case study of Carlton and United Breweries in Australia.评估跨国公司对健康的影响:以澳大利亚卡登和联合啤酒厂为例。
Global Health. 2022 Sep 9;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00870-0.
2
Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: a case study on McDonald's Australia.评估跨国公司对健康的影响:以澳大利亚麦当劳为例。
Global Health. 2017 Feb 6;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0230-4.
3
The health impacts of extractive industry transnational corporations: a study of Rio Tinto in Australia and Southern Africa.采矿业跨国公司对健康的影响:以力拓在澳大利亚和南部非洲为例的研究。
Global Health. 2019 Feb 19;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0453-2.
4
Civil society action against transnational corporations: implications for health promotion.民间社会对跨国公司的行动:对健康促进的影响。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):877-887. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz088.
5
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
6
Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: its importance and a framework.评估跨国公司对健康的影响:其重要性及一个框架。
Global Health. 2016 Jun 15;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0164-x.
7
Transnational corporations and oral health inequalities; an introduction.跨国公司与口腔健康不平等;引言
Community Dent Health. 2019 May 30;36(2):151. doi: 10.1922/CDH_SpecialIssueJamieson01.
8
Globalization, first-foods systems transformations and corporate power: a synthesis of literature and data on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry.全球化、第一食品体系转型和企业权力:跨国婴儿食品行业市场和政治实践的文献和数据综述。
Global Health. 2021 May 21;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00708-1.
9
A citizens' jury on regulation of McDonald's products and operations in Australia in response to a corporate health impact assessment.澳大利亚针对麦当劳产品和运营的监管开展公民陪审团活动,以回应企业对健康影响的评估。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Apr;42(2):133-139. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12769. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
A World Beyond Transnational Corporations: Meeting Human Rather Than Corporate Need Comment on "'Part of the Solution': Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy".超越跨国公司的世界:满足人类而非企业的需求——评“部分解决方案:食品公司的监管俘获与合法性策略”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2748-2751. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7540. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Community Health.企业社会责任的文献计量分析及其对社区健康的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;22(4):531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040531.
2
Mapping corporate sponsorship of alcohol and gambling associations: An Australian pilot study.绘制酒精和博彩协会的企业赞助情况:一项澳大利亚的试点研究。
Addiction. 2025 Jun;120(6):1156-1166. doi: 10.1111/add.16775. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Can health impact assessment help tackle commercial determinants of health and support a wellbeing economy?健康影响评估能否有助于解决健康的商业决定因素问题并支持福利经济?
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae135.
4
'A recipe for cultural disaster!'- a case study of Woolworths Group's proposal to build an alcohol megastore in Darwin, Northern Territory.“文化灾难的处方!”- 以伍尔沃思集团(Woolworths Group)在北领地达尔文市(Darwin, Northern Territory)提议建造一个酒类专卖店为例。
Global Health. 2023 Jun 10;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00938-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Industry influence over global alcohol policies via the World Trade Organization: a qualitative analysis of discussions on alcohol health warning labelling, 2010-19.通过世界贸易组织影响全球酒精政策的行业:2010-2019 年关于酒精健康警语标签的讨论的定性分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Mar;10(3):e429-e437. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00570-2. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
A Framing Analysis of Consultation Submissions on the WHO Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol: Values and Interests.对世界卫生组织全球减少有害酒精使用战略咨询意见的框架分析:价值观和利益。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1550-1561. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.68. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
3
Public opinion of alcohol industry corporate political activities.公众对酒类行业企业政治活动的看法。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Jun;45(3):283-289. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13121. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
An overview of the commercial determinants of health.商业健康决定因素概述。
Global Health. 2020 Aug 17;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00607-x.
5
Incidence of assault in Sydney, Australia, throughout 5 years of alcohol trading hour restrictions: controlled before-and-after study.澳大利亚悉尼袭击事件发生率在 5 年酒类销售时间限制期间的变化:一项对照前后研究。
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2045-2054. doi: 10.1111/add.15025. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
6
Legislative Capture: A Critical Consideration in the Commercial Determinants of Public Health.立法俘获:公共卫生商业决定因素中的关键考量
J Law Med. 2019 Jul;26(4):764-785.
7
Pregnancy, Fertility, Breastfeeding, and Alcohol Consumption: An Analysis of Framing and Completeness of Information Disseminated by Alcohol Industry-Funded Organizations.妊娠、生育、母乳喂养与饮酒:对酒精行业资助组织传播信息的框架和完整性的分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019 Sep;80(5):524-533. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.524.
8
Examining Australia's heaviest drinkers.考察澳大利亚酗酒人群。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Oct;43(5):451-456. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12901. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
The health impacts of extractive industry transnational corporations: a study of Rio Tinto in Australia and Southern Africa.采矿业跨国公司对健康的影响:以力拓在澳大利亚和南部非洲为例的研究。
Global Health. 2019 Feb 19;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0453-2.
10
Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.2016 年全球疾病负担研究:1990 年至 2016 年 195 个国家和地区的酒精使用和负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):1015-1035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

评估跨国公司对健康的影响:以澳大利亚卡登和联合啤酒厂为例。

Assessing the health impacts of transnational corporations: a case study of Carlton and United Breweries in Australia.

机构信息

Stretton Health Equity, Stretton Institute, North Tce Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.

Health Equity Research Development Unit *HERDU, UNSW Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity (CPHCE), University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Global Health. 2022 Sep 9;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00870-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12992-022-00870-0
PMID:36085238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9462641/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The practices of transnational corporations (TNCs) affect population health through unhealthy products, shaping social determinants of health, or influencing the regulatory structures governing their activities. There has been limited research on community exposures to TNC policies and practices. The aim of this paper was to adapt existing Health Impact Assessment methods that were previously used for both a fast food and an extractives industry corporation in order to assess Carlton and United Breweries (CUB) operations within Australia. CUB is an Australian alcohol company owned by a large transnational corporation Asahi Group Holdings. Data identifying potential impacts were sourced through document analysis, including corporate literature; media analysis, and 12 semi-structured interviews. The data were mapped against a corporate health impact assessment framework which included CUB's political and business practices; products and marketing; workforce, social, environmental and economic conditions; and consumers' adverse health impacts. We also conducted an ecological study for estimating alcohol attributable fractions and burdens of death due to congestive heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, breast cancer, bowel cancer and injury in Australia. Beer attributable fractions and deaths and CUB's share were also estimated.

RESULTS

We found both positive and adverse findings of the corporation's operations across all domains. CUB engage in a range of business practices which benefit the community, including sustainability goals and corporate philanthropy, but also negative aspects including from taxation arrangements, marketing practices, and political donations and lobbying which are enabled by a neoliberal regulatory environment. We found adverse health impacts including from fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and violence and aggression which disproportionately affect Indigenous and other disadvantaged populations.

CONCLUSION

Our research indicates that studying a TNC in a rapidly changing global financialised capitalist economy in a world which is increasingly being managed by TNCs poses methodological and conceptual challenges. It highlights the need and opportunity for future research. The different methods revealed sufficient information to recognise that strong regulatory frameworks are needed to help to avoid or to mediate negative health impacts.

摘要

背景

跨国公司(TNCs)的做法通过不健康的产品影响人口健康,塑造健康的社会决定因素,或影响管理其活动的监管结构。对于社区接触 TNC 政策和做法的研究有限。本文的目的是调整先前用于快餐和采矿业公司的现有健康影响评估方法,以便评估澳大利亚的卡尔顿联合酿酒厂(CUB)的运营情况。CUB 是一家澳大利亚酒类公司,由大型跨国公司朝日集团控股公司拥有。通过文件分析、媒体分析和 12 次半结构化访谈,从企业文献中获取潜在影响的数据。将这些数据与包括 CUB 的政治和商业实践、产品和营销、劳动力、社会、环境和经济状况以及消费者的不良健康影响在内的企业健康影响评估框架进行了对照。我们还进行了一项生态研究,以估计澳大利亚因充血性心力衰竭、糖尿病、中风、乳腺癌、肠癌和伤害而导致的归因于酒精的部分和负担。还估计了啤酒归因部分和死亡人数以及 CUB 的份额。

结果

我们发现公司在所有领域的运营都有积极和不利的发现。CUB 从事一系列有益于社区的商业实践,包括可持续性目标和企业慈善事业,但也有负面方面,包括税收安排、营销实践以及政治捐赠和游说,这些都是新自由主义监管环境所允许的。我们发现了一些不良健康影响,包括胎儿酒精谱系障碍和暴力与攻击,这些对土著居民和其他弱势群体的影响尤为严重。

结论

我们的研究表明,在一个日益由 TNC 管理的快速变化的全球金融化资本主义经济中研究 TNC,存在方法和概念上的挑战。它强调了未来研究的必要性和机会。不同的方法提供了足够的信息,以认识到需要强有力的监管框架来帮助避免或缓解负面健康影响。