Surgo Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Final Mile Consulting, Mumbai, India.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214922. eCollection 2019.
Inadequate quality of care in healthcare facilities is one of the primary causes of patient mortality in low- and middle-income countries, and understanding the behavior of healthcare providers is key to addressing it. Much of the existing research concentrates on improving resource-focused issues, such as staffing or training, but these interventions do not fully close the gaps in quality of care. By contrast, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the full contextual and internal drivers-such as social norms, beliefs, and emotions-that influence the clinical behaviors of healthcare providers. We aimed to provide two conceptual frameworks to identify such drivers, and investigate them in a facility setting where inadequate quality of care is pronounced. Using immersion interviews and a novel decision-making game incorporating concepts from behavioral science, we systematically and qualitatively identified an extensive set of contextual and internal behavioral drivers in staff nurses working in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) in government public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India. We found that the nurses operate in an environment of stress, blame, and lack of control, which appears to influence their perception of their role as often significantly different from the RMNCH program's perspective. That context influences their perceptions of risk for themselves and for their patients, as well as self-efficacy beliefs, which could lead to avoidance of responsibility, or incorrect care. A limitation of the study is its use of only qualitative methods, which provide depth, rather than prevalence estimates of findings. This exploratory study identified previously under-researched contextual and internal drivers influencing the care-related behavior of staff nurses in public facilities in Uttar Pradesh. We recommend four types of interventions to close the gap between actual and target behaviors: structural improvements, systemic changes, community-level shifts, and interventions within healthcare facilities.
医疗保健机构的护理质量不足是中低收入国家患者死亡率的主要原因之一,了解医疗保健提供者的行为是解决这一问题的关键。现有的大部分研究都集中在改善以资源为重点的问题上,例如人员配备或培训,但这些干预措施并不能完全弥合护理质量差距。相比之下,对于影响医疗保健提供者临床行为的完整背景和内部驱动因素(如社会规范、信仰和情感)知之甚少。我们旨在提供两个概念框架来识别这些驱动因素,并在护理质量明显不足的医疗机构中进行调查。我们使用沉浸式访谈和一种新的决策游戏,结合行为科学的概念,系统地和定性地确定了印度北方邦政府公共卫生设施中从事生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(RMNCH)工作的护士的大量背景和内部行为驱动因素。我们发现,护士在压力、指责和缺乏控制的环境中工作,这似乎影响了他们对自己角色的看法,往往与 RMNCH 计划的观点有很大不同。这种背景会影响他们对自己和患者的风险感知,以及自我效能信念,这可能导致他们逃避责任或提供错误的护理。该研究的一个局限性是仅使用定性方法,这些方法提供了深度而不是发现的普遍性估计。这项探索性研究确定了以前研究不足的影响北方邦公共设施中护士护理相关行为的背景和内部驱动因素。我们建议采取四种类型的干预措施来缩小实际行为与目标行为之间的差距:结构改进、系统变革、社区层面的转变以及医疗保健设施内的干预措施。