• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰岛素甘精和艾塞那肽单药和联合治疗的评估:一项有连续血糖监测和动态血糖谱分析的随机临床试验。

EVALUATION OF INSULIN GLARGINE AND EXENATIDE ALONE AND IN COMBINATION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL WITH CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING AND AMBULATORY GLUCOSE PROFILE ANALYSIS.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2019 Apr;25(4):306-314. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0177.

DOI:10.4158/EP-2018-0177
PMID:30995433
Abstract

Characterize the effectiveness of insulin glargine alone, exenatide alone, or combined in subjects taking stable doses of metformin and evaluate their impact on hemoglobin A1C, hypoglycemia, weight, and glucose variability. Open-label, randomized, parallel-arm study of adults with type 2 diabetes naïve to both insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonist who were not at A1C goal despite treatment with metformin. This prospective interventional study employed blinded continuous glucose monitoring ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) reports over 32 weeks. Subjects were randomized to treatment with glargine (Iglar), exenatide (GLP-1), or combination of glargine and exenatide (Iglar + GLP-1). At midpoint, those not at A1C target had the second medication added; those on Iglar + GLP-1 continued therapy optimization. Decreases in A1C were: 7.6 to 6.2% for Iglar + GLP-1, 7.5 to 6.6% for Iglar, and 7.5 to 6.4% for GLP-1. Iglar + GLP-1 achieved A1C targets faster (14 to 16 weeks) but had more hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia rates increased slightly for all arms. Weight loss was achieved in all regimens including GLP-1. Glucose variability was not reduced to the same extent in the Iglar arm as the GLP-1 arm. Addition of Iglar and/or GLP-1 to metformin for patients not at treatment goal was safe and effective. The order of medication addition needs to consider individualized AGP patterns and goals. Iglar + GLP-1 resulted in rapid A1C lowering, whereas GLP-1 was noted to have less hypoglycemia. Weight loss was most pronounced in GLP-1 monotherapy, suggesting that GLP-1 may mitigate the weight gain of Iglar. Any treatment with GLP-1 showed significant decreases in glucose variability. = hemoglobin A1c; = ambulatory glucose profile; = continuous glucose monitoring; = general linear model; = glucagon-like peptide 1 (exenatide); = insulin glargine; = sodium-glucose cotransporter 2; = self-monitoring blood glucose; = sulfonylurea; = type 2 diabetes mellitus.

摘要

描述甘精胰岛素单药、艾塞那肽单药或联合治疗在稳定剂量使用二甲双胍的患者中的有效性,并评估其对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、低血糖、体重和血糖变异性的影响。这是一项针对初治胰岛素和胰高血糖素样肽 1(GLP-1)激动剂的 2 型糖尿病成人的开放性、随机、平行臂研究,这些患者尽管接受了二甲双胍治疗,但仍未达到 HbA1C 目标。这项前瞻性干预性研究采用了连续血糖监测的盲法动态血糖监测(AGP)报告,持续 32 周。受试者被随机分配接受甘精胰岛素(Iglar)、艾塞那肽(GLP-1)或甘精胰岛素和艾塞那肽联合治疗(Iglar + GLP-1)。在中点时,那些未达到 A1C 目标的患者加用第二种药物;那些接受 Iglar + GLP-1 治疗的患者继续优化治疗。HbA1C 下降幅度为:Iglar + GLP-1 组从 7.6%降至 6.2%,Iglar 组从 7.5%降至 6.6%,GLP-1 组从 7.5%降至 6.4%。Iglar + GLP-1 更快达到 A1C 目标(14-16 周),但低血糖发生率更高。所有治疗组的低血糖发生率均略有增加。所有治疗方案均实现了体重减轻,包括 GLP-1。甘精胰岛素组的血糖变异性没有像 GLP-1 组那样显著降低。对于未达到治疗目标的患者,在二甲双胍的基础上加用 Iglar 和/或 GLP-1 是安全有效的。药物添加的顺序需要考虑个体化的 AGP 模式和目标。Iglar + GLP-1 可迅速降低 HbA1C,而 GLP-1 低血糖发生率较低。GLP-1 单药治疗的体重减轻最为明显,提示 GLP-1 可能减轻 Iglar 的体重增加。任何 GLP-1 治疗均显著降低血糖变异性。

相似文献

1
EVALUATION OF INSULIN GLARGINE AND EXENATIDE ALONE AND IN COMBINATION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL WITH CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING AND AMBULATORY GLUCOSE PROFILE ANALYSIS.胰岛素甘精和艾塞那肽单药和联合治疗的评估:一项有连续血糖监测和动态血糖谱分析的随机临床试验。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Apr;25(4):306-314. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0177.
2
Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.艾塞那肽与甘精胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效比较:一项随机试验
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Oct 18;143(8):559-69. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-8-200510180-00006.
3
Is insulin the preferred treatment for HbA1c >9%?对于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9%的患者,胰岛素是首选治疗药物吗?
J Diabetes. 2017 Sep;9(9):814-816. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12575. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF IGLARLIXI IN HISPANICS AND NON-HISPANIC WHITES WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.利拉鲁肽在 2 型糖尿病的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白种人患者中的疗效和安全性。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Nov;25(11):1091-1100. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0615. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Clinical Characteristics and Glycemic Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Requiring Maximum Dose Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed-Ratio Combination or Insulin Glargine in the LixiLan-L Trial.利西拉来/甘精胰岛素固定比例复方制剂或甘精胰岛素在 LixiLan-L 研究中需要最大剂量的患者的临床特征和血糖结局。
Adv Ther. 2019 Sep;36(9):2310-2326. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01033-1. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Tolerability and efficacy of exenatide and titrated insulin glargine in adult patients with type 2 diabetes previously uncontrolled with metformin or a sulfonylurea: a multinational, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover noninferiority trial.艾塞那肽与滴定剂量的甘精胰岛素在既往使用二甲双胍或磺脲类药物治疗未达控制目标的成年2型糖尿病患者中的耐受性和疗效:一项多国、随机、开放标签、两阶段、交叉非劣效性试验
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2333-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.006.
7
Is insulin the most effective injectable antihyperglycaemic therapy?胰岛素是最有效的注射类降糖治疗药物吗?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/dom.12402. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
8
Impact of dose capping in insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination trials in patients with type 2 diabetes.胰岛素甘精/利西那肽固定比例复方制剂临床试验中剂量封顶对 2 型糖尿病患者的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Jun;35(6):1081-1089. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1558852. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
10
Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with exenatide once weekly versus oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin glargine: achievement of glycemic and cardiovascular goals.每周一次给予 exenatide 治疗 2 型糖尿病患者与口服降糖药物或甘精胰岛素治疗相比:实现血糖和心血管目标。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Mar 23;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Compared with GLP-1 RAs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin: A Network Meta-analysis.在接受基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,替尔泊肽与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂相比的疗效和安全性:一项网状Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Jun;16(6):1279-1311. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01728-5. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
Assessing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials With Large Language Models.使用大型语言模型评估随机临床试验的偏倚风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12687.
3
Clinical perspectives on the frequency of hypoglycemia in treat-to-target randomized controlled trials comparing basal insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes: a narrative review.
关于 2 型糖尿病中基础胰岛素类似物治疗目标比较的随机对照试验中低血糖发生频率的临床观点:叙述性综述。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 May 14;12(3):e003930. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003930.
4
Perspectives of glycemic variability in diabetic neuropathy: a comprehensive review.糖尿病神经病变中血糖变异性的观点:综合评价。
Commun Biol. 2021 Dec 7;4(1):1366. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02896-3.
5
CGMS and Glycemic Variability, Relevance in Clinical Research to Evaluate Interventions in T2D, a Literature Review.CGMS 和血糖变异性,在 T2D 临床研究中评估干预措施的相关性:文献综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 9;12:666008. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.666008. eCollection 2021.
6
The Changing Landscape of Glycemic Targets: Focus on Continuous Glucose Monitoring.血糖目标的不断变化:聚焦持续葡萄糖监测
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Oct;38(4):348-356. doi: 10.2337/cd19-0093.