Pay James B, Shaw Andrew M
Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RN, UK.
Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RN, UK.
Clin Biochem. 2019 Jun;68:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a commonly used marker of systemic inflammation, routinely measured in serum blood samples. However salivary samples offer a non-invasive and easily accessible alternative which would improve point of care (POC) testing for inflammation. Two major challenges restrict the use of saliva: the influence of the oral environment on CRP and its local production; and collecting a standardised sample given patient-dependent salivary flow rates. Here we review the reported studies of salivary CRP in humans as a potential marker of systemic inflammation and how the challenges can be overcome. Salivary CRP currently poorly reflects systemic inflammation as it does not consistently and strongly correlate with serum CRP. The mean and one standard deviation reported R values are 0.53 ± 0.23 from 14 studies. An improved understanding of the key challenges and implemented solutions are needed to optimise salivary CRP use. Firstly, control for the effects of local oral inflammation. Screening for oral trauma is one option, however this could drastically limit the number of patients suitable for salivary CRP testing and the number of professionals able to use the POC test. Secondly, the role of a dilution biomarker is considered controlling for salivary flow rate which dilutes serum CRP by ~10; a variable and likely-patient specific factor. The ideal dilution biomarker should have many of the pharmacokinetic, sensitivity and specificity characteristics of CRP. The potential for positive acute phase protein serum amyloid A (SAA) and negative acute phase protein albumin is considered and the characteristics of any correction function discussed. Currently, however, there are no available strategies to make salivary CRP a reliable quantitative measure of serum CRP and hence POC systemic inflammation testing.
C反应蛋白(CRP)是一种常用的全身炎症标志物,通常在血清血样中进行检测。然而,唾液样本提供了一种非侵入性且易于获取的替代方法,这将改善炎症的即时检测(POC)。两个主要挑战限制了唾液的使用:口腔环境对CRP及其局部产生的影响;以及鉴于患者唾液流速不同,收集标准化样本。在此,我们综述了已报道的关于人类唾液CRP作为全身炎症潜在标志物的研究,以及如何克服这些挑战。目前,唾液CRP不能很好地反映全身炎症,因为它与血清CRP之间没有始终如一的强相关性。14项研究报告的R值的均值和一个标准差为0.53±0.23。需要更好地理解关键挑战并实施解决方案来优化唾液CRP的使用。首先,控制局部口腔炎症的影响。筛查口腔创伤是一种选择,然而这可能会大幅限制适合进行唾液CRP检测的患者数量以及能够使用即时检测的专业人员数量。其次,考虑使用稀释生物标志物来控制唾液流速,唾液流速会使血清CRP稀释约10倍,这是一个可变且可能因患者而异的因素。理想的稀释生物标志物应具有CRP的许多药代动力学、敏感性和特异性特征。考虑了正急性期蛋白血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)和负急性期蛋白白蛋白的潜力,并讨论了任何校正函数的特征。然而,目前尚无可用策略使唾液CRP成为血清CRP的可靠定量指标,从而实现即时全身炎症检测。