Suppr超能文献

烧伤创面活检标本分区定量微生物学与组织病理学的比较

Comparison of quantitative microbiology and histopathology in divided burn-wound biopsy specimens.

作者信息

McManus A T, Kim S H, McManus W F, Mason A D, Pruitt B A

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1987 Jan;122(1):74-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400130080012.

Abstract

We examined the association between quantitative microbiologic results and histopathologic findings in divided biopsy specimens from 200 burned patients. Microbiologic counts were determined as log10 colony-forming units per gram of disrupted tissue. Histopathologic results were scored on a scale of 1 to 6, values of 4 or greater indicating microbial invasion of viable tissue. Agreement of 96.1% was found between negative cultures, arbitrarily identified as those with fewer than 5 logs/g, and histologic absence of invasive infection. In sharp contrast, however, histologic invasion occurred in only 36% of specimens with positive cultures. Though low tissue counts are essentially synonymous with negative histologic findings, quantitative microbiology is not a diagnostic substitute for histologic examination, since high tissue counts quite commonly do not indicate invasion. The principal value of quantitative burn-wound biopsies is the demonstration of predominant burn-wound flora.

摘要

我们研究了200例烧伤患者的活检标本中定量微生物学结果与组织病理学发现之间的关联。微生物计数以每克破碎组织中10的对数菌落形成单位来确定。组织病理学结果按1至6分进行评分,4分及以上的值表明微生物侵犯了存活组织。在任意定义为每克少于5对数的阴性培养物与组织学上无侵袭性感染之间,发现一致性为96.1%。然而,形成鲜明对比的是,在培养阳性的标本中,只有36%出现了组织学侵袭。虽然低组织计数基本上与阴性组织学结果同义,但定量微生物学并不能替代组织学检查进行诊断,因为高组织计数通常并不表明存在侵袭。定量烧伤创面活检的主要价值在于显示主要的烧伤创面菌群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验