Suppr超能文献

使用加权组合方法通过过程指标量化患者满意度。

Quantifying patient satisfaction with process metrics using a weighted bundle approach.

作者信息

Riebling Nancy B, Norouzzadeh Shaghayegh, Reeder George, Mouradian Christina, Hillier Alison, Cowan Ryan, Doerfler Martin

机构信息

Clinical Transformation, Northwell Health, Lake Success, New York, USA.

Partners in Clinical Care, LLP, Islip, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 9;8(1):e000458. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000458. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current patient satisfaction assessment results are delayed and obtained from select patient surveys. As a result, these assessments may not represent the experience of the entire patient population. This study developed a method to measure and evaluate all patients' experiences while they are within the care episode and link it to processes within the organisation.

METHODS

Using the Six Sigma methodology, sites assembled diverse teams to categorise and analyse negative experience comments from patients to understand the drivers of dissatisfaction. These customer expectations lead to the development of the four components in the Patient Experience Bundle (PEB): communication, environment, basic needs/comfort and logistics. Individual process elements were ranked to create a numerical relationship between service and the needs expressed by the voice of the customer. Sites created surveys incorporating questions that focused on the bundle elements and measured daily bundle compliance. Graphical analysis and hypothesis testing enabled sites to determine key drivers of patient dissatisfaction within the bundle elements. Improvement strategies were developed and implemented to address the key drivers of patient dissatisfaction.

RESULTS

After implementing process improvements focused on issues identified by the PEB, bundle compliance improved from an average of 51% to an average of 82.5% and Press Ganey Likelihood to Recommend (PG LTR) scores improved from an average of 64.73% to an average 74.64%. The data demonstrated that the trends in improving PEB are followed by meaningful changes in PG LTR scores.

CONCLUSION

This work is built on the identification of common elements of care that impact patient satisfaction and detailed mathematical analysis of the relationship between factors. Using the bundle concept, these improvement efforts maintain highly reliable processes to drive outcomes and provide real-time feedback on patient experience.

摘要

背景

目前患者满意度评估结果延迟,且是从部分患者调查中获得的。因此,这些评估可能无法代表全体患者的体验。本研究开发了一种方法,用于在患者接受护理期间衡量和评估所有患者的体验,并将其与医疗机构内部流程相联系。

方法

各机构运用六西格玛方法组建多元化团队,对患者的负面体验评论进行分类和分析,以了解不满的驱动因素。这些客户期望促成了患者体验包(PEB)四个组成部分的形成:沟通、环境、基本需求/舒适度和后勤保障。对各个流程要素进行排序,以建立服务与客户声音所表达需求之间的数值关系。各机构设计了包含聚焦于体验包要素问题的调查问卷,并每日测量体验包合规情况。通过图形分析和假设检验,各机构能够确定体验包要素中导致患者不满的关键驱动因素。制定并实施了改进策略,以解决导致患者不满的关键驱动因素。

结果

在针对PEB所确定问题实施流程改进后,体验包合规率从平均51%提高到了平均82.5%,Press Ganey推荐可能性(PG LTR)得分从平均64.73%提高到了平均74.64%。数据表明PEB改善趋势之后随之而来的是PG LTR得分的显著变化。

结论

这项工作建立在对影响患者满意度的护理共同要素的识别以及对各因素之间关系的详细数学分析基础之上。利用体验包概念,这些改进措施维持了高度可靠的流程以推动成果,并提供有关患者体验的实时反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/688a/6440602/49224b9d6608/bmjoq-2018-000458f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying patient satisfaction with process metrics using a weighted bundle approach.
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 9;8(1):e000458. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000458. eCollection 2019.
2
Patient satisfaction in otolaryngology: Can academic institutions compete?
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1000-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23255. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
3
Using the Evidence-Based Practice Service Nursing Bundle to Increase Patient Satisfaction.
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jan;44(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Using Press Ganey Provider Feedback to Improve Patient Satisfaction: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1051-1059. doi: 10.1111/acem.13248. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
6
Improving Patient Experience of Care Providers in a Multispecialty Ambulatory Pediatrics Practice.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 Jan;58(1):50-59. doi: 10.1177/0009922818806309. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention bundle in an adult intensive care.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016 Dec;37:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
8
Serving the Customer – Do Patient Feedback and Questionnaires Improve Quality?
Dent Update. 2017 Jan;44(1):75-9. doi: 10.12968/denu.2017.44.1.75.
9
Understanding patient willingness to recommend and return: a strategy for prioritizing improvement opportunities.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Jun;25(6):271-87. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30444-8.
10
Clinic Satisfaction Tool Improves Communication and Provides Real-Time Feedback.
Neurosurgery. 2019 Apr 1;84(4):908-918. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy137.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
HCAHPS Survey Results: Impact of Severity of Illness on Hospitals' Performance on HCAHPS Survey Results.
J Patient Exp. 2014 Nov;1(2):16-21. doi: 10.1177/237437431400100204. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
2
Finding the Heart of [Hospital]ity: Patient Satisfaction and the Healthcare Experience.
J Patient Exp. 2014 May;1(1):23-25. doi: 10.1177/237437431400100106. Epub 2014 May 1.
3
Analytical Insights from Patient Narratives: The Next Step for Better Patient Experience.
J Patient Exp. 2014 May;1(1):20-22. doi: 10.1177/237437431400100105. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Do Press Ganey Scores Correlate With Total Knee Arthroplasty-Specific Outcome Questionnaires in Postsurgical Patients?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S109-S112. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
The Importance of Patient Satisfaction: A Blessing, a Curse, or Simply Irrelevant?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):257-261. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002848.
6
Evidence of non-response bias in the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 4;16(a):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1595-z.
7
Patient satisfaction surveys: tools to enhance patient care or flawed outcome measures?
PM R. 2013 Dec;5(12):1069-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.10.012.
8
High-reliability health care: getting there from here.
Milbank Q. 2013 Sep;91(3):459-90. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12023.
10
Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients.
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):605-611.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验