Suppr超能文献

蛋白酶体抑制剂通过激活半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶(caspases)和 CAD 引发突变,而组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂伏立诺他和罗米地辛引起的诱变则与 caspase/CAD 无关。

Proteasome inhibitors trigger mutations via activation of caspases and CAD, but mutagenesis provoked by the HDAC inhibitors vorinostat and romidepsin is caspase/CAD-independent.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.

出版信息

Apoptosis. 2019 Jun;24(5-6):404-413. doi: 10.1007/s10495-019-01543-x.

Abstract

Genotoxic anti-cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy can contribute to an increase in second malignancies in cancer survivors due to their oncogenic effects on non-cancerous cells. Inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins or the proteasome differ from chemotherapy in that they eliminate cancer cells by regulating gene expression or cellular protein equilibrium, respectively. As members of these drug classes have been approved for clinical use in recent times, we investigated whether these two drug classes exhibit similar mutagenic capabilities as chemotherapy. The HDAC inhibitors vorinostat/SAHA and romidepsin/FK288 were found to induce DNA damage, and mis-repair of this damage manifested into mutations in clonogenically viable surviving cells. DNA damage and mutations were also detected in cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Exposure to both drug classes stimulated caspase activation consistent with apoptotic cell death. Inhibition of caspases protected cells from bortezomib-induced acute (but not clonogenic) death and mutagenesis, implying caspases were required for the mutagenic action of bortezomib. This was also observed for second generation proteasome inhibitors. Cells deficient in caspase-activated DNase (CAD) also failed to acquire DNA damage or mutations following treatment with bortezomib. Surprisingly, vorinostat and romidepsin maintained an equivalent level of killing and mutagenic ability regardless of caspase or CAD activity. Our findings indicate that both drug classes harbour mutagenic potential in vitro. If recapitulated in vivo, the mutagenicity of these agents may influence the treatment of cancer patients who are more susceptible to oncogenic mutations due to dysfunctional DNA repair pathways.

摘要

遗传毒性抗癌疗法,如化疗和放疗,由于其对非癌细胞的致癌作用,可能导致癌症幸存者中第二恶性肿瘤的增加。组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)抑制剂或蛋白酶体抑制剂与化疗不同,它们通过调节基因表达或细胞蛋白平衡分别消除癌细胞。由于这些药物类别的成员最近已被批准用于临床,我们研究了这两类药物是否具有与化疗相似的致突变能力。发现 HDAC 抑制剂伏立诺他/SAHA 和罗米地辛/FK288 诱导 DNA 损伤,并且这种损伤的错误修复表现为克隆存活细胞中的突变。用蛋白酶体抑制剂硼替佐米处理的细胞中也检测到 DNA 损伤和突变。两种药物类别的暴露均刺激半胱天冬酶激活,与细胞凋亡死亡一致。半胱天冬酶抑制剂保护细胞免受硼替佐米诱导的急性(但非克隆生成)死亡和致突变作用,这意味着半胱天冬酶是硼替佐米致突变作用所必需的。这也观察到第二代蛋白酶体抑制剂。缺乏半胱天冬酶激活的 DNA 酶(CAD)的细胞在用硼替佐米处理后也未能获得 DNA 损伤或突变。令人惊讶的是,伏立诺他和罗米地辛无论半胱天冬酶或 CAD 活性如何,均保持相当的杀伤和致突变能力。我们的研究结果表明,这两类药物在体外均具有致突变潜力。如果在体内重现,这些药物的致突变性可能会影响那些由于 DNA 修复途径功能障碍而易患致癌突变的癌症患者的治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验