Center for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School-McLean Hospital.
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 May;87(5):484-490. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000393.
Despite a growing body of research supporting the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for depressed adolescents, few studies have investigated the role of the acquisition and use of CBT skills in accounting for symptom improvement. The present study examined the role of cognitive versus behavioral skills in predicting symptom improvement in depressed youth. Analyses considered different raters of patient skills (patient vs. therapist) as well as disaggregated between-patient versus within-patient effects.
Data were derived from a 12-week clinical trial of CBT for depressed adolescent females (N = 33; ages 13-18 years; 69.7% White). Both therapist-report and patient-report measures of CBT skills (skills of cognitive therapy) were acquired at 5 time points throughout therapy: Sessions 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II) were assessed at every session.
Therapist and patient ratings of CBT skills showed small to moderate associations (rs = .20-.38). Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated that the majority of the variance in skills scores (61-90%) was attributable to within-patient variance from session to session, rather than due to between-patient differences. When disaggregating within-patient and between-patient effects, and consistent with a causal relationship, within-patient variability in both patient-rated (b = -2.55; p = .025) and therapist-rated (b = -2.41; p = .033) behavioral skills predicted subsequent symptom change.
Analyses highlight the importance of the acquisition and use of behavioral skills in CBT for depressed adolescents. Findings also underscore the importance of disentangling within-patient from between-patient effects in future studies, an approach infrequently used in process-outcome research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管越来越多的研究支持认知行为疗法(CBT)对抑郁青少年的疗效,但很少有研究调查 CBT 技能的获得和使用在解释症状改善方面的作用。本研究考察了认知技能与行为技能在预测抑郁青少年症状改善方面的作用。分析考虑了不同的患者技能评估者(患者与治疗师)以及患者间与患者内效应的分解。
数据来自一项针对抑郁青少年女性的 12 周 CBT 临床试验(N = 33;年龄 13-18 岁;69.7%为白人)。在整个治疗过程中,共进行了 5 次评估,获得了治疗师报告和患者报告的 CBT 技能(认知治疗技能)测量:第 1、3、6、9 和 12 次治疗。在每次治疗中都评估了抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表-Ⅱ)。
治疗师和患者对 CBT 技能的评分显示出较小到中等的相关性(rs =.20-.38)。组内相关系数表明,技能评分的大部分变异(61-90%)归因于患者从一次治疗到另一次治疗的个体内差异,而不是患者间差异。当分解患者内和患者间效应时,并且与因果关系一致,患者自评(b = -2.55;p =.025)和治疗师自评(b = -2.41;p =.033)行为技能的患者内变异性预测了随后的症状变化。
分析结果强调了在 CBT 中获得和使用行为技能对抑郁青少年的重要性。研究结果还强调了在未来研究中区分患者内与患者间效应的重要性,这是过程-结果研究中很少使用的方法。(APA,2019,所有权利保留)。