Suppr超能文献

20%白蛋白液体负荷对健康受试者的疗效和安全性:四种复苏液的比较

Efficacy and safety of 20% albumin fluid loading in healthy subjects: a comparison of four resuscitation fluids.

作者信息

Bihari Shailesh, Wiersema Ubbo F, Perry Rebecca, Schembri David, Bouchier Tara, Dixon Dani, Wong Teresa, Bersten Andrew D

机构信息

Intensive and Critical Care Unit, Flinders Medical Centre , Bedford Park, South Australia , Australia.

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University , Adelaide, South Australia , Australia.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Jun 1;126(6):1646-1660. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01058.2018. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

Abstract

Recently, buffered salt solutions and 20% albumin (small volume resuscitation) have been advocated as an alternative fluid for intravenous resuscitation. The relative comparative efficacy and potential adverse effects of these solutions have not been evaluated. In a randomized, double blind, cross-over study of six healthy male subjects we compared the pulmonary and hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of 30 ml/kg of 0.9% saline, Hartmann's solution and 4% albumin, and 6 ml/kg of 20% albumin (albumin dose equivalent). Lung tests (spirometry, ultrasound, impulse oscillometry, diffusion capacity, and plethysmography), two- to three-dimensional Doppler echocardiography, carotid applanation tonometry, blood gases, serum/urine markers of endothelial, and kidney injury were measured before and after each fluid bolus. Data were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA with effect of fluid type examined as an interaction. Crystalloids caused lung edema [increase in ultrasound B line ( = 0.006) and airway resistance ( = 0.009)], but evidence of lung injury [increased angiopoietin-2 ( = 0.019)] and glycocalyx injury [increased syndecan ( = 0.026)] was only observed with 0.9% saline. The colloids caused greater left atrial stretch, decrease in lung volumes, and increase in diffusion capacity than the crystalloids, but without pulmonary edema. Stroke work increased proportionally to increase in preload with all four fluids ( = 0.71). There was a greater increase in cardiac output and stroke volume after colloid administration, associated with a reduction in afterload. Hartmann's solution did not significantly alter ventricular performance. Markers of kidney injury were not affected by any of the fluids administrated. Bolus administration of 20% albumin is both effective and safe in healthy subjects. Bolus administration of 20% albumin is both effective and safe in healthy subjects when compared with other commonly available crystalloids and colloidal solution.

摘要

最近,缓冲盐溶液和20%白蛋白(小容量复苏)已被提倡作为静脉复苏的替代液体。这些溶液的相对比较疗效和潜在不良反应尚未得到评估。在一项对6名健康男性受试者进行的随机、双盲、交叉研究中,我们比较了静脉注射30 ml/kg的0.9%生理盐水、哈特曼溶液和4%白蛋白以及6 ml/kg的20%白蛋白(白蛋白剂量等效物)的肺部和血流动力学效应。在每次推注液体前后,测量肺部测试(肺活量测定、超声、脉冲振荡法、弥散能力和体积描记法)、二维至三维多普勒超声心动图、颈动脉压平眼压测量、血气、内皮和肾损伤的血清/尿液标志物。数据采用重复测量方差分析进行分析,将液体类型的效应作为交互作用进行检验。晶体液导致肺水肿[超声B线增加(=0.006)和气道阻力增加(=0.009)],但仅在0.9%生理盐水组观察到肺损伤证据[血管生成素-2增加(=0.019)]和糖萼损伤[多配体蛋白聚糖增加(=0.026)]。与晶体液相比,胶体液导致更大的左心房扩张、肺容积减小和弥散能力增加,但无肺水肿。所有四种液体的每搏功均与前负荷增加成比例增加(=0.71)。胶体液给药后心输出量和每搏量增加更大,同时后负荷降低。哈特曼溶液对心室功能无显著影响。肾损伤标志物不受任何一种给药液体的影响。在健康受试者中,推注20%白蛋白既有效又安全。与其他常用的晶体液和胶体溶液相比,在健康受试者中推注20%白蛋白既有效又安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验