Suppr超能文献

使用新的欧洲定义评估经导管主动脉生物瓣的长期结构退化。

Assessment of Long-Term Structural Deterioration of Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves Using the New European Definition.

机构信息

Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1096, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, FHU REMOD-VHF, France (E.D., A.S., C.T., P.Y.L., G.A., A.C., H.E.).

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat Hospital, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Diderot University, Department of Cardiology, DHU Fire, INSERM U1148, Paris-Diderot University Paris, France (M.U.-A., C.B., D.H., B.I.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007597. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007597.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The durability of transcatheter aortic bioprosthetic valves is a crucial issue, but data are scarce, especially beyond 5 years of follow-up. We aimed to assess long-term (7 years) structural valve deterioration (SVD) and bioprosthetic valve failure of transcatheter aortic bioprosthetic valves.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with at least 5-year follow-up available undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation from April 2002 to December 2011 in 5 French centers were included. Incidence of SVD and bioprosthetic valve failure were defined according to newly standardized criteria of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions/European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and reported as cumulative incidence function to account for the competing risk of death. One thousand four hundred three consecutive patients were included with a mean age of 82.6±7.5 years and with a mean logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) of 21.3±7.5%. A balloon-expandable valve was used in 83.7% of cases. Survival rates were 83.5% (95% CI, 81.4%-85.5%) and 18.6% (95% CI, 15.3%-21.8%) at 1 and 7 years, respectively. Median duration of follow-up was 3.9 years. Bioprosthetic valve failure occurred in 19 patients with a 7-year cumulative incidence of 1.9% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.4%). SVD occurred in 49 patients (moderate, n=32; severe, n=17) with a 7-year cumulative incidence of moderate and severe SVD of 7.0% (95% CI, 5.6%-8.4%) and 4.2% (95% CI, 2.9%-5.5%), respectively. Five patients had aortic valve reintervention (1.0%; 95% CI, 0.4%-1.6%) including 1 case of surgical aortic valve replacement and 4 redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The incidences of SVD and bioprosthetic valve failure were not significantly different between balloon and self-expandable prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term assessment of transcatheter aortic bioprosthetic valves durability is limited by the poor survival of our population beyond 5 years. Further studies are warranted, particularly in younger and lower-risk patients.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉生物瓣的耐久性是一个关键问题,但数据稀缺,尤其是在 5 年以上的随访中。我们旨在评估经导管主动脉生物瓣的长期(7 年)结构性瓣膜退化(SVD)和生物瓣失效。

方法和结果

连续纳入 2002 年 4 月至 2011 年 12 月在 5 个法国中心接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术且至少有 5 年随访数据的患者。根据欧洲经皮心血管介入协会/欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会的新标准化标准定义 SVD 和生物瓣失效的发生率,并以累积发生率函数报告,以考虑死亡的竞争风险。纳入 1403 例连续患者,平均年龄 82.6±7.5 岁,平均 logistic EuroSCORE(欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统)为 21.3±7.5%。83.7%的病例使用球囊扩张瓣膜。1 年和 7 年的生存率分别为 83.5%(95%CI,81.4%-85.5%)和 18.6%(95%CI,15.3%-21.8%)。中位随访时间为 3.9 年。19 例患者发生生物瓣失效,7 年累积发生率为 1.9%(95%CI,1.4%-2.4%)。49 例患者发生 SVD(中度,n=32;重度,n=17),7 年中度和重度 SVD 的累积发生率分别为 7.0%(95%CI,5.6%-8.4%)和 4.2%(95%CI,2.9%-5.5%)。5 例患者进行了主动脉瓣再介入治疗(1.0%;95%CI,0.4%-1.6%),包括 1 例外科主动脉瓣置换和 4 例再次经导管主动脉瓣植入术。球囊和自膨式瓣膜的 SVD 和生物瓣失效发生率无显著差异。

结论

我们人群的生存率在 5 年以上较差,这限制了经导管主动脉生物瓣耐久性的长期评估。需要进一步研究,特别是在年轻和低危患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验