Value-based Health Care: Moving Beyond "Minimum Clinically Important Difference" to a Tiered System of Evaluating Successful Clinical Outcomes.
作者信息
Bernstein David N, Nwachukwu Benedict U, Bozic Kevin J
机构信息
D. N. Bernstein, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA B. U. Nwachukwu, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA K. Bozic, Chair, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):945-947. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000741.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Value-based Health Care: Moving Beyond "Minimum Clinically Important Difference" to a Tiered System of Evaluating Successful Clinical Outcomes.基于价值的医疗保健：超越“最小临床重要差异”，迈向评估成功临床结果的分层系统。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):945-947. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000741.
2
How are we measuring clinically important outcome for operative treatments in sports medicine?我们如何衡量运动医学中手术治疗的临床重要结局？
Phys Sportsmed. 2017 May;45(2):159-164. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2017.1292108. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
3
Clinical Faceoff: How Does Patient Satisfaction Fit Into the Value Equation?临床对峙：患者满意度如何融入价值等式？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):21-24. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000031.
4
Quality, Safety, Value: From Theory to Practice Management What Should We Measure?质量、安全、价值：从理论到实践管理 我们应该衡量什么？
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5 Suppl 1):S61-6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000551.
5
Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery.衡量骨科手术患者的满意度。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jan 7;97(1):80-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00811.
6
The Dimension of the Press Ganey Survey Most Important in Evaluating Patient Satisfaction in the Academic Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery Setting.在学术性门诊骨科手术环境中评估患者满意度时，Press Ganey调查中最重要的维度。
Orthopedics. 2019 Jul 1;42(4):198-204. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190625-03.
7
The presence of residents during orthopedic operation exerts no negative influence on outcome.在骨科手术过程中存在住院医师并不会对结果产生负面影响。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Jun 19;130(1):65-80. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz009.
8
Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.评估脊柱外科手术质量和效果：患者满意度不能作为有效替代指标。
Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 16.
9
Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.定义 I 级退变性腰椎滑脱的最小临床重要差异：来自质量结果数据库的见解。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17554.
10
A comparison of patient satisfaction when office-based procedures are performed by general surgery residents versus an attending surgeon.比较由普通外科住院医师与主治医生进行门诊手术时患者的满意度。
Surgery. 2019 Jul;166(1):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
引用本文的文献
1
A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.《基于价值的专科护理外科医生指南》
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Aug 25;10(4):e70239. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70239. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Measuring Short-Term Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Value-Based Healthcare Approach.测量初次全髋关节置换术后的短期结果：基于价值医疗的方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3310. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103310.
3
Association of Preoperative Walking Speed With 1-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.术前步行速度与股骨髋臼撞击综合征髋关节镜检查术后1年预后的相关性
Sports Health. 2025 Jan 17:19417381241309918. doi: 10.1177/19417381241309918.
4
A Consistent Lack of Consistency: Definitions, Evidentiary Expectations and Potential Use of Meaningful Change Data in Clinical Outcome Assessments Across Stakeholders. Results from a DIA Working Group Literature Review and Survey.始终缺乏一致性：临床结局评估中有意义变化数据的定义、证据期望及潜在用途。DIA工作组文献综述与调查结果
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):337-348. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00739-x. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
5
CORR Insights®: Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?CORR 见解®：是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):704-706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003343. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
6
The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition.患者报告结局与韧带重建肌腱间置术患者满意度的关系。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Dec;48(12):1218-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
7
Impact of Sports Participation on Achievement of Clinically Relevant Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后2年运动参与对临床相关结局达成情况的影响
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):23259671231187327. doi: 10.1177/23259671231187327. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Outcomes Vary Significantly Using a Tiered Approach To Define Success After Total Hip Arthroplasty.采用分层方法定义全髋关节置换术后的成功标准，结果差异显著。
Iowa Orthop J. 2023;43(1):45-54.
9
Application of Machine Learning to Improve Appropriateness of Treatment in an Orthopaedic Setting of Personalized Medicine.机器学习在骨科个性化医疗环境中应用以提高治疗适宜性
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 12;12(10):1706. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101706.
10
The Effect of State-Level Prescription Opioid Legislation on Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression.州级处方阿片类药物立法对腰椎管微减压术后患者预后的影响。
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun 16;16(4):720-6. doi: 10.14444/8310.
本文引用的文献
1
What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?全膝关节置换术后 HOOS 和 KOOS 及 JR 版本的最小和实质性改善是什么？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2432-2441. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456.
2
Determining Success or Failure After Foot and Ankle Surgery Using Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS).使用患者可接受症状状态 (PASS) 和患者报告的结果信息系统 (PROMIS) 来确定足踝手术后的成功或失败。
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Aug;39(8):894-902. doi: 10.1177/1071100718769666. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Defining the "Substantial Clinical Benefit" After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症后“显著临床获益”的定义
Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1297-1303. doi: 10.1177/0363546516687541. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.简讯：最小临床重要差异——可靠估计值的可用性。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):933-946. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5204-6. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
Editorial-Measuring Satisfaction: Can It Be Done?社论——衡量满意度：可行吗？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3071-3. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4485-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
6
What is value in health care?医疗保健中的价值是什么？
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
7
Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.定义腰椎融合术后的显著临床获益。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1839-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01095.
8
OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited.OMERACT-OARSI倡议：国际骨关节炎研究学会对骨关节炎临床试验应答标准的重新审视。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 May;12(5):389-99. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.001.
9
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.健康状况的测量。确定最小临床重要差异。
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.
Zotero 插件