Park Hyungjong, Baek Jang-Hyun, Kim Byung Moon
Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Severance Stroke Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Neurology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 2;10:308. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00308. eCollection 2019.
Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become a standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. However, whether EVT tools used for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related LVO are as safe and effective as for use in embolic LVO remains unclear. There have been only a few studies about EVT for ICAS-related LVO, and these studies revealed that mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever or contact aspiration was less effective and more time consuming in ICAS-related LVO than in embolic LVO. Because fast and successful recanalization (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia grade, 2b or 3) is the most critical factor influencing favorable outcomes, it is important to determine the appropriate EVT strategy for fast recanalization of ICAS-related LVO. In this report, we review the results of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever or contact aspiration and rescue treatments after failure of mechanical thrombectomy for ICAS-related LVO. Finally, we propose the EVT strategy appropriate for ICAS-related LVO based on a literature review and our experience.
血管内治疗(EVT)已成为前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)所致急性缺血性卒中的标准治疗方法。然而,用于颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)相关LVO的EVT工具是否与用于栓塞性LVO一样安全有效仍不清楚。关于ICAS相关LVO的EVT研究较少,这些研究表明,与栓塞性LVO相比,使用支架取栓器或接触抽吸进行机械取栓在ICAS相关LVO中效果较差且耗时更长。由于快速且成功的再通(定义为改良脑缺血溶栓分级,2b或3级)是影响良好预后的最关键因素,因此确定适合ICAS相关LVO快速再通的合适EVT策略很重要。在本报告中,我们回顾了使用支架取栓器或接触抽吸进行机械取栓的结果以及ICAS相关LVO机械取栓失败后的补救治疗。最后,我们根据文献综述和我们的经验提出适合ICAS相关LVO的EVT策略。