ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Brain Behav. 2019 Jun;9(6):e01277. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1277. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
The aim of this exploratory study was to assess the EEG correlates of head positions (which have never been studied in humans) in participants with different psychophysiological characteristics, as encoded by their hypnotizability scores. This choice is motivated by earlier studies suggesting different processing of vestibular/neck proprioceptive information in subjects with high (highs) and low (lows) hypnotizability scores maintaining their head rotated toward one side (RH).
We analyzed EEG signals recorded in 20 highs and 19 lows in basal conditions (head forward) and during RH using spectral analysis, which captures changes localized to specific recording sites, and topological data analysis (TDA), which instead describes large-scale differences in processing and representing sensorimotor information.
Spectral analysis revealed significant differences related to head position for alpha 1, beta 2, beta 3, and gamma bands, but not to hypnotizability. TDA instead revealed global hypnotizability-related differences in the strengths of the correlations among recording sites during RH. Significant changes were observed in lows on the left parieto-occipital side and in highs in right frontoparietal region. Significant differences between the two groups were found in the occipital region, where changes were larger in lows than in highs.
This study reports finding of the EEG correlates of changes in the head posture for the first time, indicating that hypnotizability is related to the head posture representation/processing on large-scale networks and that spectral and topological data analyses provide complementary results.
本探索性研究旨在评估不同心理生理特征参与者的头部位置的 EEG 相关性(这在人类中从未研究过),这些特征由他们的催眠易感性评分编码。之所以做出这样的选择,是因为早期的研究表明,在头部向一侧旋转(RH)时,高(高催眠者)和低(低催眠者)催眠易感性评分的受试者对前庭/颈部本体感觉信息的处理不同。
我们在基础状态(头部向前)和 RH 期间分析了 20 名高催眠者和 19 名低催眠者的 EEG 信号,使用了频谱分析,该分析捕捉了特定记录部位的局部变化,以及拓扑数据分析(TDA),它描述了处理和表示感觉运动信息的大规模差异。
频谱分析显示,与头部位置相关的差异与 alpha 1、beta 2、beta 3 和 gamma 频段有关,但与催眠易感性无关。TDA 则显示了在 RH 期间记录部位之间相关性的全局催眠易感性相关差异。在左顶枕侧的低催眠者和右额顶区的高催眠者中观察到显著的变化。在枕区发现了两组之间的显著差异,其中低催眠者的变化大于高催眠者。
这项研究首次报告了头部姿势变化的 EEG 相关性的发现,表明催眠易感性与头部姿势的大尺度网络表示/处理有关,并且频谱和拓扑数据分析提供了互补的结果。