Frigerio-Domingues Carlos E, Gkalitsiou Zoi, Zezinka Alexandra, Sainz Eduardo, Gutierrez Joanne, Byrd Courtney, Webster Ronald, Drayna Dennis
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, 35A Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Lang Stuttering Institute and Moody College of Communication, 300 W. Dean Keeton (A0900), University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
J Commun Disord. 2019 Jul-Aug;80:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
We investigated whether outcomes of therapy for persistent developmental stuttering differ in individuals who carry a mutation in one of the known genes associated with stuttering compared to individuals without such mutations.
We studied outcomes of an intensive fluency shaping-based therapy program in individuals with persistent developmental stuttering. We evaluated a cohort of 51 stuttering individuals with who carried a mutation in either the GNPTAB, GNPTG, NAGPA, or AP4E1 gene. We compared therapy outcomes in these individuals with outcomes in 51 individuals matched for age, gender, and ethnicity, who stutter and underwent the same therapy program, and did not carry a mutation in any of these genes. Fluency pre- and post-therapy was evaluated using blinded observer-based quantitative stuttering dysfluency measures (Dysfluent Words Score, DWS), and by subjects' self-reported measures of struggle, avoidance and expectancy behavior associated with speaking (Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory, PSI). The difference between pre- and post-therapy fluency scores was taken as the measure of near-term therapy efficacy.
Comparison of fluency measures showed a strong effect of therapy overall. Mutation carriers achieved significantly less resolution in PSI following therapy, with PSI scores showing significantly less improvement in individuals who carry a mutation (p = 0.0157, RR = 1.75, OR = 2.92) while the group difference in DWS between carriers and non-carriers was statistically not significant in the present study, the trend observed in the results warrants further research focused on this important issue.
These results suggest stuttering is more resistant to therapy in individuals who carry a mutation in one of the genes known to be associated with stuttering.
我们调查了与无此类突变的个体相比,携带与口吃相关的已知基因之一发生突变的个体在持续性发育性口吃治疗中的结果是否存在差异。
我们研究了基于强化流畅性塑造的治疗方案在持续性发育性口吃个体中的效果。我们评估了一组51名口吃个体,他们在GNPTAB、GNPTG、NAGPA或AP4E1基因中携带一种突变。我们将这些个体的治疗结果与51名年龄、性别和种族匹配的口吃个体的结果进行了比较,这些个体也接受了相同的治疗方案,且在这些基因中均未携带突变。治疗前后的流畅性通过基于盲法观察者的定量口吃不流畅性测量(不流畅单词得分,DWS)以及受试者自我报告的与说话相关的挣扎、回避和预期行为测量(口吃感知量表,PSI)进行评估。治疗前后流畅性得分的差异被用作近期治疗效果的衡量指标。
流畅性测量的比较显示总体治疗效果显著。治疗后,突变携带者在PSI上的改善明显较少,携带突变的个体PSI得分改善明显较少(p = 0.0157,RR = 1.75,OR = 2.92),而在本研究中,携带者和非携带者之间DWS的组间差异在统计学上不显著,结果中观察到的趋势值得针对这一重要问题进行进一步研究。
这些结果表明,在携带已知与口吃相关基因之一发生突变的个体中,口吃对治疗的抵抗性更强。