Kang Young-Jae, Frank Joseph F
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
J Food Prot. 1989 Aug;52(8):560-563. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-52.8.560.
All Glass Impinger-30 (AGI-30), Andersen 6-stage Sieve Air Sampler (Andersen impactor), Reuter centrifugal air sampler (RCS sampler), and Millipore open type membrane filter sampler (Filter sampler) were evaluated for recovery of artificially-generated aerosols of pure cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens , Escherichia coli , Streptococcus faecalis , and endospores of Bacillus subtilis . Size distribution of the aerosol was analyzed to determine its relationship to air sampler efficiency. Five min after the spray, 71 to 85% of particles were between 1.1-3.3 μm in size and 3.5 to 10.4% were smaller than 1.1 μm in size. The Andersen impactor recovered significantly greater numbers of nonsporeforming bacteria, with least variability of recovery and the RCS sampler recovered significantly smaller numbers and exhibited greatest variability of the four samplers tested. AGI-30 and Filter sampler performance varied depending on the species tested. For recovery of bacterial endospore, the Filter and Andersen samplers both recovered greater numbers than the AGI-30 and RCS sampler. The RCS sampler recovered a significantly lower number of spores with the most variable results of the four samplers. Our data indicate that the Andersen impactor is the sampler of choice for recovering microbial aerosols of interest to the food processing industry.
对全玻璃冲击式采样器 -30(AGI - 30)、安德森六级筛孔空气采样器(安德森撞击式采样器)、路透离心空气采样器(RCS采样器)和密理博开放式膜滤采样器(滤膜采样器)进行了评估,以检测其对荧光假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、粪肠球菌纯培养物以及枯草芽孢杆菌芽孢的人工生成气溶胶的回收能力。分析了气溶胶的粒径分布,以确定其与空气采样器效率的关系。喷雾后5分钟,71%至85%的颗粒粒径在1.1 - 3.3μm之间,3.5%至10.4%的颗粒粒径小于1.1μm。安德森撞击式采样器回收的无芽孢形成细菌数量显著更多,回收变异性最小,而RCS采样器回收的数量显著更少,在所测试的四个采样器中变异性最大。AGI - 30和滤膜采样器的性能因所测试的物种而异。对于细菌芽孢的回收,滤膜采样器和安德森采样器回收的数量均多于AGI - 30和RCS采样器。RCS采样器回收的芽孢数量显著更低,在四个采样器中结果变异性最大。我们的数据表明,安德森撞击式采样器是回收食品加工业感兴趣的微生物气溶胶的首选采样器。